What are the benefits and harms of laparoscopic repair in people with perforated peptic ulcer disease?

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kurinchi Gurusamy
Keyword(s):  
Peptic Ulcer ◽  
Peptic Ulcer Disease ◽  
Laparoscopic Repair ◽  
Perforated Peptic Ulcer ◽  
Ulcer Disease

Open Versus Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Peptic Ulcer Disease

2020 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter O. Coe ◽  
Matthew J. Lee ◽  
Hannah Boyd-Carson ◽  
Sonia Lockwood ◽  
Arin Saha
Keyword(s):  
Peptic Ulcer ◽  
Peptic Ulcer Disease ◽  
Laparoscopic Repair ◽  
Perforated Peptic Ulcer ◽  
Ulcer Disease ◽  
Open Versus

Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer disease

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alvaro Sanabria ◽  
Maria Isabel Villegas ◽  
Carlos Hernando Morales Uribe
Keyword(s):  
Peptic Ulcer ◽  
Peptic Ulcer Disease ◽  
Laparoscopic Repair ◽  
Perforated Peptic Ulcer ◽  
Ulcer Disease

Comparison Between Open and Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Peptic Ulcer Disease

2008 ◽  
Vol 32 (11) ◽  
pp. 2371-2374 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricky H. Bhogal ◽  
Ruvinder Athwal ◽  
Damien Durkin ◽  
Mark Deakin ◽  
Chandra N. V. Cheruvu
Keyword(s):  
Peptic Ulcer ◽  
Peptic Ulcer Disease ◽  
Laparoscopic Repair ◽  
Perforated Peptic Ulcer ◽  
Ulcer Disease

FEASIBILITY OF ERAS (ENHANCED RECOVERY AFTER SURGERY) PROTOCOL IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING EMERGENCY REPAIR FOR PERFORATED PEPTIC ULCER DISEASE IN A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL

2021 ◽  
pp. 41-43
Author(s):  
Chayan Rui ◽  
Chandan Roy Choudhury ◽  
Puspak Ghosh
Keyword(s):  
Peptic Ulcer ◽  
Peptic Ulcer Disease ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Perforated Peptic Ulcer ◽  
Patch Repair ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Ulcer Disease ◽  
Emergency Repair

Introduction: The surgical treatment of perforated peptic ulcer disease has evolved in parallel to advances in medical treatment of Peptic Ulcer Disease. Objective: To investigate the feasibility of ERAS (Enhanced Recovery after Surgery) Pathways in patients undergoing emergency repair for Perforated peptic ulcer disease. Materials and methods: Institutional based prospective analytical study. Indoor patients in Dept. of General Surgery in Medical College and Hospital Kolkata. January 2019 to June 2020. Study was conducted for 18 months.14 months was provided for data collection. Next 2 months for statistical analysis and another 2 months for thesis writing and submission. Conclusion: ERAS pathway (with some modications) seems to be safe and feasible in a highly selected subset of patients undergoing emergency Omental grahams patch repair of Perforated Peptic Ulcer Disease

scholarly journals Association of Helicobacter Pylori with Peptic Ulcer Perforation

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-10
Author(s):  
Sunit Agrawal ◽  
D Thakur ◽  
P Kafle ◽  
A Koirala ◽  
R K Sanjana ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Helicobacter Pylori ◽  
Peptic Ulcer ◽  
Peptic Ulcer Disease ◽  
Perforated Peptic Ulcer ◽  
Patch Repair ◽  
Peptic Ulcer Perforation ◽  
Ulcer Disease ◽  
Ulcer Perforation ◽  
H Pylori

Background: Helicobacter pylori is found in more than 90% cases of peptic ulcer. This study examines the possibility of association of Helicobacter pylori in perforated peptic ulcer disease and its relation to persisting ulcer as well as the influence of other risk factors; namely: smoking, alcohol, current non-steroidal anti inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and steroid use. Materials and Methods: In this prospective study, total of 50 cases of peptic ulcer perforation admitted in College of Medical Sciences and Teaching Hospital, Bharatpur, Nepal were selected on the basis of the non-probability (purposive) sampling method. All patients who presented with suspected peptic ulcer perforation were included in the study and the perforations were repaired by Modified Graham’s Patch and were given triple therapy postoperatively. The age, sex, incidence, mode of presentation, precipitating factors, association with the risk factors and postoperative complications were all evaluated and compared. Results: Of 50 patients studied, the age ranged from 17 to 75 years, mean age being 40.1 years with the peak incidence in the 3rd and 5th decades of life showing a male dominance (92%). H. pylori was seen in ulcer edge biopsy in 29 patients (58%). Most common clinical presentation was pain abdomen, the most common signs of perforation were tenderness, rebound tenderness and absent bowel sounds. The mean duration of stay in hospital in H. pylori positive patients was 12.07±8.15 days as compared with 11.1±5.12 days in H. pylori negative patients. The incidence of peptic ulcer perforation was higher in the patients consuming alcohol (64%) than smokers (48%), followed by NSAIDs user(22%). 20% of the patients with delayed presentation developed complications postoperatively. Perforated peptic ulcer was repaired by Modified Graham’s Patch Repair, followed by anti H. pylori therapy in all of them. Conclusion: Peptic ulcer perforation is quite common among the patients with peptic ulcer disease with history of chronic smoking, alcoholism and analgesic intake, more commonly in males. There is association of H. pylori in 58% of patients with peptic ulcer perforation.

scholarly journals Non-perforated peptic ulcer disease: multidetector CT findings, complications, and differential diagnosis

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 455-469 ◽  
Author(s):  
Massimo Tonolini ◽  
Anna Maria Ierardi ◽  
Elena Bracchi ◽  
Paolo Magistrelli ◽  
Adriana Vella ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Differential Diagnosis ◽  
Peptic Ulcer ◽  
Peptic Ulcer Disease ◽  
Multidetector Ct ◽  
Perforated Peptic Ulcer ◽  
Ulcer Disease ◽  
Ct Findings
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document