For cognitively healthy older adults, how does computerized cognitive training compare with alternative computer-based interventions for maintaining cognitive function?

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sera Tort ◽  
Gregor Veninšek
2017 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 1032-1035
Author(s):  
Antonia Yaneva ◽  
Nonka Mateva

Cognitive interventions, especially cognitive training, may improve cognitive functions in healthy older adults. Computerized cognitive training platforms offer several advantages over traditional programs for cognitive training and stimulation. The focus of this article is the methodology of the studies that apply a particular online training program. We investigate the effectiveness of several studies for cognitive training in healthy elderly people and evaluate reported outcomes and potential bias and what factors determine, influence or contribute to the positive or negative results. The post-intervention scores demonstrate that computerized cognitive training may enhance some cognitive functions and the overall cognitive status but there is need for additional research to prove its effectiveness.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 258-273
Author(s):  
Sheida Rabipour ◽  
Cassandra Morrison ◽  
Jessica Crompton ◽  
Marcelo Petrucelli ◽  
Murillo de Oliveira Gonçalves Germano ◽  
...  

Health ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (01) ◽  
pp. 20-55
Author(s):  
Elke Kalbe ◽  
Christophe Bintener ◽  
Anja Ophey ◽  
Christian Reuter ◽  
Stefan Göbel ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheida Rabipour ◽  
Cassandra Morrison ◽  
Jessica Crompton ◽  
Marcelo Petrucelli ◽  
Murillo de Oliveira Gonçalves Germano ◽  
...  

AbstractComputerized cognitive training programs are becoming increasingly popular and practical for cognitive aging. Nevertheless, basic questions remain about the benefits of such programs, and about the degree to which participant expectations might influence training and transfer. Here we examined a commercial cognitive training program (Activate) in a 5-week double-blind, pseudo-randomized placebo-controlled trial. Based on a priori power analysis, we recruited 99 healthy older adults 59-91 years of age (M = 68.87, SD = 6.31; 69 women), assigning them to either the intervention or an active control program (Sudoku and n-back working memory exercises). We subdivided both groups into high and low expectation priming conditions, to probe for effects of participants’ expectations on training and transfer. We assessed transfer using a battery of standard neuropsychological and psychosocial measures that had been agreed to by the training program developers. We planned and pre-registered our analyses (on osf.io). The majority (88%) of participants progressed through the training, and most provided positive feedback about it. Similarly, the majority (80%) of participants believed they were truly training their brains. Yet, transfer of training was minimal. Also minimal were any effects of expectations on training and transfer, although participants who received high expectation priming tended to engage more with their assigned program overall. Our findings suggest limited benefits ofActivatetraining on cognition and psychosocial wellbeing in healthy older adults, at least under the conditions we used.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 487-487
Author(s):  
Siman Lv ◽  
Cuiping Ni ◽  
Yu Liu

Abstract Computerized cognitive intervention has the potential to enhance cognition among healthy older adults. However, little is known of the factors associated with adherence in computerized cognitive training among healthy older adults in China. This study was designed to explore these factors utilizing a descriptive qualitative method. A semi-structured interview was used to interview 13 informants. The analysis suggested that factors associated with adherence to the computerized cognitive intervention, included 3 core themes:(1) individual characteristics, with three subthemes of “having free time”, “emotion”, and “persistence characteristics”; (2) encouragement, with three subthemes of “peer group support”, “support from healthcare professional”, and “supervision from facilitators”; and (3) self-recognized improvement related to training, with two subthemes of “better brain function” and “emotion improved”. The results revealed multi-factors promote adherence including personal and social aspects.


2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii1-ii4
Author(s):  
L Beishon ◽  
V Haunton ◽  
H Subramaniam ◽  
E Mukaetova-Ladinska ◽  
R Paneraia ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Cognitive training (CT) may be beneficial in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and early dementia. However, few studies have qualitatively evaluated CT programmes in dementia. The aim of this analysis was to explore the benefits and barriers to a home-based computerised CT programme for healthy older adults, and people living with MCI or dementia. Methods This was a nested qualitative study within a larger feasibility randomised trial of CT. Participants underwent semi-structured interviews after 12 weeks of CT. Where possible, participants were interviewed with their carers. The interview schedule and analysis were underpinned by the health belief model. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, open-coded, and categorised into themes. The analytical framework was developed, and themes were condensed under four major categories: benefits and efficacy, barriers, threat, and behaviour. Results 37 participants underwent interviews (10 healthy older adults, 4 MCI, 5 dementia, 9 patient-carer dyads [2 MCI, 7 dementia]). CT was feasible and acceptable to participants. Benefits included: enjoyment, improved awareness, benchmarking cognitive function, reassurance of abilities, and giving back control. Barriers were more prevalent amongst those with dementia: problems with technology, frustration, conflict between patients and carers, apathy and lack of insight, anxiety or low mood, and lack of portability. Perceived risk susceptibility of dementia varied between participants. Healthy older adults and MCI perceived the severity of dementia risk as high, which was only partially mitigated by CT. Participants living with dementia valued a more individualised approach to training, accounting for baseline characteristics. For people living with dementia, maintenance was as valued as improvement of cognitive function. Conclusions CT was a feasible intervention for healthy older adults, and people living with dementia and MCI. Benefits were present, but the identified barriers need to be addressed for CT to be implemented successfully.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document