How does native tissue repair (anterior colporrhaphy) compare with other surgical techniques in women with anterior compartment prolapse?

2017 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Tissue Repair ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Anterior Colporrhaphy ◽  
Native Tissue Repair ◽  
Anterior Compartment ◽  
Native Tissue ◽  
Anterior Compartment Prolapse

Effectiveness, quality of life and sexual functions in women with anterior compartment prolapse treated by native tissue repair

2019 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Monti ◽  
Michele C. Schiavi ◽  
Vanessa Colagiovanni ◽  
Valentina Sciuga ◽  
Ottavia D'oria ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Tissue Repair ◽  
Native Tissue Repair ◽  
Anterior Compartment ◽  
Native Tissue ◽  
Anterior Compartment Prolapse

scholarly journals Comparison of treatment outcomes for native tissue repair and sacrocolpopexy as apical suspension procedures at the time of hysterectomy for uterine prolapse

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sumin Oh ◽  
E. Kyung Shin ◽  
Sowoon Hyun ◽  
Myung Jae Jeon
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Outcomes ◽  
Tissue Repair ◽  
Uterine Prolapse ◽  
Reoperation Rate ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Native Tissue Repair ◽  
Apical Suspension ◽  
Native Tissue ◽  
Surgical Failure

AbstractConcomitant apical suspension should be performed at the time of hysterectomy for uterine prolapse to reduce the risk of recurrent prolapse. Native tissue repair (NTR) and sacrocolpopexy (SCP) are commonly used apical suspension procedures; however, it remains unclear which one is preferred. This study aimed to compare the treatment outcomes of NTR and SCP in terms of surgical failure, complication and reoperation rates. Surgical failure was defined as the presence of vaginal bulge symptoms, any prolapse beyond the hymen, or retreatment for prolapse. This retrospective cohort study included 523 patients who had undergone NTR (n = 272) or SCP (n = 251) along with hysterectomy for uterine prolapse and who had at least 4-month follow-up visits. During the median 3-year follow-up period, the surgical failure rate was higher in the NTR group (21.3% vs 6.4%, P < 0.01), with a low rate of retreatment in both groups. Overall complication rates were similar, but complications requiring surgical correction under anesthesia were more common in the SCP group (7.2% vs 0.4%, P < 0.01). As a result, the total reoperation rate was significantly higher in the SCP group (8.0% vs 2.6%, P = 0.02). Taken together, NTR may be a preferred option for apical suspension when hysterectomy is performed for uterine prolapse.

Sexual Function Following Trocar‐guided Mesh or Vaginal Native Tissue Repair in Recurrent Prolapse: A Randomized Controlled Trial

2011 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 2944-2953 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alfredo L. Milani ◽  
Mariella I.J. Withagen ◽  
Hok S. The ◽  
Ileana Nedelcu‐van der Wijk ◽  
Mark E. Vierhout
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Sexual Function ◽  
Tissue Repair ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Recurrent Prolapse ◽  
Native Tissue Repair ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Native Tissue

Vaginal Native Tissue Repair for Posterior Compartment Prolapse

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 419-423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Carlo Schiavi ◽  
Ottavia DʼOria ◽  
Pierangelo Faiano ◽  
Giovanni Prata ◽  
Anna Di Pinto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tissue Repair ◽  
Posterior Compartment ◽  
Native Tissue Repair ◽  
Native Tissue

The role of hydrodissection in native tissue repair of anterior vaginal wall defects

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Polina Schwarzman ◽  
Benzion Samueli ◽  
Ruth Shaco‐Levy ◽  
Yael Baumfeld ◽  
Elad Leron ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tissue Repair ◽  
Vaginal Wall ◽  
Anterior Vaginal Wall ◽  
Native Tissue Repair ◽  
Native Tissue
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document