Should psychotherapists apologise after microaggressions? An empirical analogue study of perceptions of therapists

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abigail K. Overstreet ◽  
Andrew M. Pomerantz ◽  
Daniel J. Segrist ◽  
Eunyoe Ro
Keyword(s):  
Analogue Study ◽  
Perceptions Of Therapists

Care dependency may help and hurt psychological treatment: A treatment-analogue study with students in clinical training.

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 374-388
Author(s):  
Naline Geurtzen ◽  
Ger P. J. Keijsers ◽  
Johan C. Karremans ◽  
Giel J. M. Hutschemaekers
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Training ◽  
Psychological Treatment ◽  
Care Dependency ◽  
Analogue Study

Diffraction from dislocations and grain boundaries – an optical analogue study

1978 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 284-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. K. Mathur ◽  
B. K. Samantaray ◽  
G. B. Mitra
Keyword(s):  
Grain Boundaries ◽  
Analogue Study

The effects of cognitive reappraisal on conditioned disgust in contamination-based OCD: An analogue study

2017 ◽  
Vol 51 ◽  
pp. 86-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bunmi O. Olatunji ◽  
Hannah Berg ◽  
Rebecca C. Cox ◽  
Amber Billingsley
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Reappraisal ◽  
Analogue Study

scholarly journals Let’s find the evidence: An analogue study of confirmation bias in criminal investigations

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anita Eerland ◽  
Eric Rassin
Keyword(s):  
Police Officers ◽  
Confirmation Bias ◽  
Initial Assessment ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Case File ◽  
District Attorneys ◽  
Tunnel Vision ◽  
Analogue Study ◽  
Alternative Scenarios ◽  
Selection Of

People involved in criminal proceedings (e.g. police officers, district attorneys, judges, and jury members) may run the risk of developing confirmation bias, or tunnel vision. That is, these parties may readily become convinced that the suspect is guilty, and may then no longer be open to alternative scenarios in which the suspect is actually innocent. This may be reflected in a preference for guilt-confirming investigation endeavours, as opposed to investigations that are aimed at confirming, or even excluding, alternative scenarios. In three studies, participants read a case file, and were subsequently instructed to select additional police investigations. Some of these additional endeavours were guilt- confirming (i.e. incriminating), whereas others were disconfirming (i.e. exonerating). Results suggest that additional investigation search was guided by an initial assessment of the suspect’s guilt (Study 1). Furthermore, participants’ tendency to select incriminat- ing investigations increased with increased crime severity, and with the strength of the evidence present in the case file. Finally, the selection of incriminating investigations was associated with conviction rates (Study 3). However, in general, participants did not favour incriminating endeavours. That is, in the three studies, the percentages of selected incriminating endeavours did hardly or not exceed 50%.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document