scholarly journals Barriers and facilitators to shared decision‐making in child and youth mental health: Exploring young person and parent perspectives using the Theoretical Domains Framework

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Hayes ◽  
Julian Edbrooke‐Childs ◽  
Rosa Town ◽  
Miranda Wolpert ◽  
Nick Midgley
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Theoretical Domains Framework ◽  
Youth Mental Health ◽  
Young Person ◽  
Barriers And Facilitators ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Parent Perspectives

scholarly journals Developing a Framework to Support Shared Decision Making for Youth Mental Health Medication Treatment

2010 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 474-481 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth L. Crickard ◽  
Megan S. O’Brien ◽  
Charles A. Rapp ◽  
Cheryl L. Holmes
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Youth Mental Health ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Medication Treatment

scholarly journals The Choice Project: Peer Workers Promoting Shared Decision Making at a Youth Mental Health Service

2017 ◽  
Vol 68 (8) ◽  
pp. 764-770 ◽  
Author(s):  
Magenta Bender Simmons ◽  
Samantha Batchelor ◽  
Tara Dimopoulos-Bick ◽  
Deb Howe
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Mental Health Service ◽  
Health Service ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Youth Mental Health ◽  
Shared Decision

scholarly journals A systematic review of shared decision making interventions in child and youth mental health: synthesising the use of theory, intervention functions, and behaviour change techniques

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Hayes ◽  
Julian Edbrooke-Childs ◽  
Rosa Town ◽  
Miranda Wolpert ◽  
Nick Midgley
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Quality Assessment ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Behaviour Change ◽  
Youth Mental Health ◽  
Behaviour Change Techniques ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Specific Intervention ◽  
Inclusion Criteria

AbstractReviews around interventions to improve shared decision making (SDM) for child and youth mental health have produced inconclusive findings on what approaches increase participation. Importantly, the previous reviews did not explore the use of theory, as well as mechanisms of change (intervention functions) and active units of change (behaviour change techniques). The aim of this review was to explore these factors and ascertain how, if at all, these contribute to SDM. Five databases were searched up until April 2020. Studies met inclusion criteria if they were: (a) an intervention to facilitate SDM; (b) aimed at children, adolescence, or young people aged up to 25, with a mental health difficulty, or their parents/guardians; and (c) included a control group. Data were extracted on patient characteristics, study design, intervention, theoretical background, intervention functions, behaviour change techniques, and SDM. Quality assessment of the studies was undertaken using the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) quality assessment tool. Eight different interventions met inclusion criteria. The role of theory to increase SDM remains unclear. Specific intervention functions, such as ‘education’ on SDM and treatment options and ‘environmental restructuring’ using decision aids, are being used in SDM interventions, as well as ‘training’ for clinicians. Similarly, behaviour change techniques linked to these, such as ‘adding objects to the environment’, ‘discussing pros/cons’, and clinicians engaging in ‘behavioural practice/rehearsal’. However, as most studies scored low on the quality assessment criteria, as well as a small number of studies included and a low number of behaviour change techniques utilised, links between behaviour change techniques, intervention functions and increased participation remain tentative. Intervention developers and clinicians may wish to consider specific intervention functions and behaviour change techniques to facilitate SDM.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document