“Coronally Advanced Flap Combined with Sticky Bone and i‐PRF Coated Collagen Membrane to Treat Single Maxillary Gingival Recessions – Case Series”

Author(s):  
Preeti Kapa Bhargavi ◽  
N.K. Sowmya ◽  
G.V. Gayathri ◽  
D.S. Mehta
2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 37-43
Author(s):  
Harsha. M B

BACKGROUND: Gingival recession (GR), often an aesthetic concern to the patient, is also associated with root sensitivity, and has a predilection to root caries. The purpose of this case series was to evaluate a bioabsorbable collagen membrane for root coverage with guided tissue regeneration (GTR) procedure, in localized gingival recession defects. METHODS: Three cases presented in this case series, showing a localized Miller’s Class I or Class II gingival recession were treated for root coveragewith GTR-based collagen membrane. The graft was completely covered with coronally advanced flap and followed up to 6th month postoperatively. RESULTS: Six months following the procedure, the root coverage was found to be 100% in all three cases. The root coverage obtained appeared structurally and functionally stable. CONCLUSION: It may be concluded that the resorbable collagen membrane could be reliably used in the treatment of gingival recession.


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig E. Hofferber ◽  
J. Cameron Beck ◽  
Peter C. Liacouras ◽  
Jeffrey R. Wessel ◽  
Thu P. Getka

Abstract Background The purpose of this study was to evaluate the volumetric changes in partially edentulous alveolar ridges augmented with customized titanium ridge augmentation matrices (CTRAM), freeze-dried bone allograft, and a resorbable collagen membrane. Methods A pre-surgical cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan was obtained for CTRAM design/fabrication and to evaluate pre-surgical ridge dimensions. Ridge augmentation surgery using CTRAM, freeze-dried bone allograft, and a resorbable collagen membrane was performed at each deficient site. Clinical measurements of the area of augmentation were made at the time of CTRAM placement and re-entry, and a 2nd CBCT scan 7 months after graft placement was used for volumetric analysis. Locations of each CTRAM in situ were also compared to their planned positions. Re-entry surgery and implant placement was performed 8 months after CTRAM placement. Results Nine subjects were treated with CTRAM and freeze-dried bone allograft. Four out of the nine patients enrolled (44.4%) experienced premature CTRAM exposure during healing, and in two of these cases, CTRAM were removed early. Early exposure did not result in total graft failure in any case. Mean volumetric bone gain was 85.5 ± 30.9% of planned augmentation volume (61.3 ± 33.6% in subjects with premature CTRAM exposure vs. 104.9% for subjects without premature exposure, p = 0.03). Mean horizontal augmentation (measured clinically) was 3.02 mm, and vertical augmentation 2.86 mm. Mean surgical positional deviation of CTRAM from the planned location was 1.09 mm. Conclusion The use of CTRAM in conjunction with bone graft and a collagen membrane resulted in vertical and horizontal bone gain suitable for implant placement.


2003 ◽  
Vol 74 (7) ◽  
pp. 1071-1079 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles S. Zahedi ◽  
S. Asghar Miremadi ◽  
Gérard Brunel ◽  
Eric Rompen ◽  
Jean-Pierre Bernard ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 79 (6) ◽  
pp. 1101-1107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuval Zubery ◽  
Eran Nir ◽  
Arie Goldlust

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document