Use of a Novel In Situ Hardening Biphasic Alloplastic Bone Grafting Material for Guided Bone Regeneration around Dental Implants – A Prospective Case Series

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liran Levin ◽  
Danielle Clark‐Perry
Keyword(s):  
Bone Regeneration ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Guided Bone Regeneration ◽  
Prospective Case Series

Reconstructive therapy for the management of peri‐implantitis via submerged guided bone regeneration: A prospective case series

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 342-350
Author(s):  
Alberto Monje ◽  
Ramón Pons ◽  
Andrea Roccuzzo ◽  
Giovanni E. Salvi ◽  
José Nart
Keyword(s):  
Bone Regeneration ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Guided Bone Regeneration ◽  
Prospective Case Series

Bone Grafting and Guided Bone Regeneration for Immediate Dental Implants in Humans

1994 ◽  
Vol 65 (9) ◽  
pp. 881-891 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marlin E. Gher ◽  
George Quintero ◽  
Daniel Assad ◽  
Edward Monaco ◽  
A. C. Richardson
Keyword(s):  
Bone Regeneration ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Guided Bone Regeneration

scholarly journals Guided bone regeneration with L‐PRF in the Atrophic Maxilla – A prospective case series study – One year results

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (S19) ◽  
pp. 383-383
Author(s):  
João CaramÍs ◽  
Duarte Marques ◽  
Marta Lopes ◽  
Helena Francisco ◽  
Andrè Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Regeneration ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Guided Bone Regeneration ◽  
Case Series Study ◽  
Atrophic Maxilla ◽  
Prospective Case Series ◽  
One Year ◽  
Series Study

scholarly journals Digital Customized Titanium Mesh for Bone Regeneration of Vertical, Horizontal and Combined Defects: A Case Series

Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 60
Author(s):  
Daniele De Santis ◽  
Federico Gelpi ◽  
Giuseppe Verlato ◽  
Umberto Luciano ◽  
Lorena Torroni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Formation ◽  
Bone Regeneration ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Guided Bone Regeneration ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Significant Gain ◽  
Titanium Mesh ◽  
New Bone Formation ◽  
Correct Method ◽  
Combined Defects

Background and Objective: Guided bone regeneration allows new bone formation in anatomical sites showing defects preventing implant rehabilitation. Material and Methods: The present case series reported the outcomes of five patients treated with customized titanium meshes manufactured with a digital workflow for achieving bone regeneration at future implant sites. A significant gain in both width and thickness was achieved for all patients. Results: From a radiographic point of view (CBTC), satisfactory results were reached both in horizontal and vertical defects. An average horizontal gain of 3.6 ± 0.8 mm and a vertical gain of 5.2 ± 1.1 mm. Conclusions: The findings from this study suggest that customized titanium meshes represent a valid method to pursue guided bone regeneration in horizontal, vertical or combined defects. Particular attention must be paid by the surgeon in the packaging of the flap according to a correct method called the “poncho” technique in order to reduce the most frequent complication that is the exposure of the mesh even if a partial exposure of one mesh does not compromise the final outcome of both the reconstruction and the healing of the implants.

Additive manufacturing to assist prosthetically guided bone regeneration of atrophic maxillary arches

2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 705-715 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Fantini ◽  
F. De Crescenzio ◽  
L. Ciocca ◽  
F. Persiani
Keyword(s):  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Bone Regeneration ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Guided Bone Regeneration ◽  
Autogenous Bone ◽  
Bone Augmentation ◽  
Virtual Planning ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Fused Deposition

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to describe two different approaches for manufacturing pre-formed titanium meshes to assist prosthetically guided bone regeneration of atrophic maxillary arches. Both methods are based on the use of additive manufacturing (AM) technologies and aim to limit at the minimal intervention the bone reconstructive surgery by virtual planning the surgical intervention for dental implants placement. Design/methodology/approach – Two patients with atrophic maxillary arches were scheduled for bone augmentation using pre-formed titanium mesh with particulate autogenous bone graft and alloplastic material. The complete workflow consists of four steps: three-dimensional (3D) acquisition of medical images and virtual planning, 3D modelling and design of the bone augmentation volume, manufacturing of biomodels and pre-formed meshes, clinical procedure and follow up. For what concerns the AM, fused deposition modelling (FDM) and direct metal laser sintering (DMLS) were used. Findings – For both patients, a post-operative control CT examination was scheduled to evaluate the progression of the regenerative process and verify the availability of an adequate amount of bone before the surgical intervention for dental implants placement. In both cases, the regenerated bone was sufficient to fix the implants in the planned position, improving the intervention quality and reducing the intervention time during surgery. Originality/value – A comparison between two novel methods, involving AM technologies are presented as viable and reproducible methods to assist the correct bone augmentation of atrophic patients, prior to implant placement for the final implant supported prosthetic rehabilitation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document