scholarly journals The role of procalcitonin in identifying high‐risk cancer patients with febrile neutropenia: A useful alternative to the multinational association for supportive care in cancer score

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Chaftari ◽  
Anne‐Marie Chaftari ◽  
Ray Hachem ◽  
Sai‐Ching J. Yeung ◽  
Hiba Dagher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Supportive Care ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
High Risk Cancer

scholarly journals Use of FDG PET/CT for investigation of febrile neutropenia: evaluation in high-risk cancer patients

2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (8) ◽  
pp. 1348-1355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen D. Guy ◽  
Adrian R. Tramontana ◽  
Leon J. Worth ◽  
Eddie Lau ◽  
Rodney J. Hicks ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Fdg Pet ◽  
Pet Ct ◽  
High Risk Cancer ◽  
Fdg Pet Ct

scholarly journals A questionnaire survey on evaluation for penetration and compliance of the Japanese Guideline on Febrile Neutropenia among hematology-oncology physicians and surgeons

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nobu Akiyama ◽  
Takuho Okamura ◽  
Minoru Yoshida ◽  
Shun-ichi Kimura ◽  
Shingo Yano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Supportive Care ◽  
Questionnaire Survey ◽  
Primary Treatment ◽  
Beta Lactam ◽  
Clinical Practices ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Mascc Score ◽  
Risk Patients

Abstract Purpose The Japanese Society of Medical Oncology published a guideline (GL) on febrile neutropenia (FN) in 2017. The study’s purpose is to reveal how widely GL penetrated among physicians and surgeons providing chemotherapy. Methods A questionnaire survey was conducted with SurveyMonkey™ for members of the Japanese Association of Supportive Care in Cancer and relevant academic organizations. Each question had four options (always do, do in more than half of patients, do in less than half, do not at all) and a free description form. Responses were analyzed with statistical text-analytics. Result A total of 800 responses were retrieved. Major respondents were experts with more than 10-year experience, physicians 54%, and surgeons 46%. Eighty-seven percent of respondents knew and used GL. Forty-eight percent assessed FN with Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) score “always” or “more than half.” Eighty-one percent chose beta-lactam monotherapy as primary treatment in high-risk patients. Seventy-seven percent did oral antibacterial therapy in low-risk patients ambulatorily. Seventy-eight percent administered primary prophylactic G-CSF (ppG-CSF) in FN frequency ≥ 20% regimen. Fifty-nine percent did ppG-CSF for high-risk patients in FN frequency 10–20% regimen. Ninety-seven percent did not use ppG-CSF in FN frequency < 10% regimen. The medians of complete and complete plus partial compliance rates were 46.4% (range 7.0–92.8) and 77.8% (range 35.4–98.7). The complete compliance rates were less than 30% in seven recommendations, including the MASCC score assessment. Conclusion GL is estimated to be widely utilized, but some recommendations were not followed, presumably due to a mismatch with actual clinical practices in Japan.

A Predictive Risk Score for Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: Role of Screening In A Prospective Study

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 3173-3173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alok A. Khorana ◽  
Kimberly Herman ◽  
Deborah Rubens ◽  
Charles W. Francis
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Risk Score ◽  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Risk Model ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Clinical Risk Score ◽  
Clinical Risk ◽  
Predictive Risk

Abstract Abstract 3173 Background: We evaluated the utility of screening for VTE using a previously developed clinical risk score (Khorana et al, Blood 2008) in a prospective cohort of cancer patients initiating outpatient chemotherapy but not receiving thromboprophylaxis. Methods: Cancer patients initiating a new chemotherapy regimen and deemed high-risk based on a predictive risk model (score ≥3) were enrolled on an ongoing prospective cohort study with informed consent. Patients were evaluated with baseline and Q4 (± 1) week serial ultrasonography for upto 16 weeks; additionally, computed tomography scans for restaging were also evaluated for VTE. Results: Of 30 patients enrolled on study, 8 (27%) developed a VTE. This included 5 patients with DVT alone (17%), 1 patient with PE alone (3%) and 2 (7%) with both. Twenty-seven patients underwent a baseline ultrasound. Of these, 3 asymptomatic DVTs were identified (11%). Subsequent ultrasounds were performed in 18 patients at week 4 (0 DVT), 17 patients at week 8 (0 DVT) and 15 patients at week 12 (1 DVT, 7%). An additional two patients developed symptomatic DVT between weeks 1 and 4. Restaging CT scans identified an asymptomatic PE in 1 patient at week 6 and asymptomatic PE in 1 patient at week 9 with subsequent symptomatic DVT at week 10. Conclusions: In a prospective observational study, 27% of cancer outpatients deemed high-risk using a clinical risk score developed VTE, a rate much higher than observed even in hospitalized acutely ill patients. Thus, this study confirms the validity of a previously described risk score. The role of thromboprophylaxis in this population is currently being tested. The value of screening ultrasonography should be considered in high-risk patients based on this risk score. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

HER2 in high-risk rectal cancer patients treated in EXPERT-C, a randomized phase II trial of neoadjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) and chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with or without cetuximab.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14616-e14616
Author(s):  
Francesco Sclafani ◽  
Amitesh Chandra Roy ◽  
Ian Chau ◽  
Andrew Wotherspoon ◽  
Clare Peckitt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Therapeutic Target ◽  
Predictive Biomarker ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Her 2 ◽  
Low Prevalence ◽  
The Impact

e14616 Background: HER-2 is a well established therapeutic target in breast and gastric cancer. The role of HER-2 in rectal cancer is unclear, as conflicting data on prevalence of HER-2 expression have been reported. Preclinical data indicate a potential role of HER-2 in mediating resistance of rectal cancer to chemoradiotherapy and cetuximab. This analysis evaluates the prevalence of HER-2 and its impact on the outcome of high risk rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant CAPOX and CRT ± cetuximab in EXPERT-C. Methods: Eligible patients with available tumour tissue for HER-2 analysis were included. HER-2 expression was determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in biopsy and/or surgical specimens (score 0 to 3+). Tumours with equivocal IHC result (2+) were tested for HER-2 amplification by B-DISH. Tumours with IHC 3+ or B-DISH ratio ≥2.0 were classified as HER-2 positive. The impact of HER-2 on primary (CR) and secondary endpoints (RR, PFS, OS) of the study was analyzed. Results: Of 164 eligible study patients, 104 (63%) biopsy and 114 (69%) surgical specimens were available for analysis. Only 3/104 (2.9%) and 3/114 (2.6%) were HER-2 positive, respectively. In 77 patients with paired specimens, concordance for HER-2 status was found in 74 (96%). Overall 141 patients were assessable for HER-2; 6/141 (4.3%) had a HER-2 positive tumour in at least 1 specimen. The median follow-up was 58.7 months. HER-2 expression or amplification was not associated with a difference in outcome for any of the study endpoints, including in the subset of 90 KRAS/BRAF wild type patients treated ± cetuximab. In an exploratory analysis, 44 IHC 0/1+ random specimens were tested by B-DISH and HER-2 amplification was found in 3/38 (7.9%, insufficient material in 6 cases). Conclusions: Based on the low prevalence of expression (according to the classical criteria for defining HER-2 positivity) as recorded in EXPERT-C, HER-2 does not appear to represent a useful therapeutic target for high risk rectal cancer. We did not confirm the role of HER-2 as prognostic factor or potential predictive biomarker for cetuximab-based treatment.

Assessing the impact of a targeted electronic medical record intervention on growth factor usage in cancer patients.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (30_suppl) ◽  
pp. 262-262
Author(s):  
Jordan Bernens ◽  
Kara Hartman ◽  
Brendan F. Curley ◽  
Sijin Wen ◽  
Jame Abraham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Medical Record ◽  
Electronic Medical Record ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Individual Risk ◽  
Individual Risk Factors ◽  
The Impact

262 Background: Patients receiving chemotherapy are at risk for febrile neutropenia following treatment. The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommend screening patients for risk of febrile neutropenia and risk stratification based on likelihood of febrile neutropenia events. Prophylactic growth factors (G-CSF) should be in patients receiving high-risk regimens or intermediate-risk regimens with individual risk factors. The impact of electronic medical record system (EMR) implementation on compliance with G-CSF support guidelines has not been studied. Methods: At West Virginia University/Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center we conducted an IRB approved retrospective chart review of cancer patients receiving chemotherapy from January 1, 2007 to August 1, 2008 (pre-EMR) and January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011 (post-EMR). We reviewed the chemotherapy regimens and patient risk factors for developing febrile neutropenia, and determined if the G-CSF usage was consistent with guideline recommendations. Results: Compliance with prophylactic G-CSF guidelines was 75.6% in the post-EMR arm, compared to 67.5% in the pre-EMR arm (p=0.041, ch-square). The post EMR data of 1,042 new chemotherapy initiations showed: (see Table). The appropriateness of usage in high and low risk patients were the most compliant, as G-CSF orders were built into chemotherapy plans of high risk regimens and omitted from low risk regimens. Conclusions: Appropriate prophylactic G-CSF usage can be improved when orders are integrated into standard chemotherapy order sets in an EMR. An area of further improvement would include automatic identification of individual risk factors by the EMR. [Table: see text]

Overall survival in patients with lung cancer using a web-application-guided follow-up compared to standard modalities: Results of phase III randomized trial.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA9006-LBA9006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabrice Denis ◽  
Claire Lethrosne ◽  
Nicolas Pourel ◽  
Olivier Molinier ◽  
Yoann Pointreau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Supportive Care ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Web Application ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
P Value ◽  
Lung Cancer Patients

LBA9006 Background: We developed a web-application for an early detection of symptomatic relapse, complications and early supportive care in high-risk lung cancer patients between visits. A dynamical analysis of the weekly self-reported symptoms automatically triggered physician visit. Methods: We performed a national multi-institutional phase 3 prospective randomized study to compare web-application follow-up (experimental arm) for which patient’s self-scored symptoms that were weekly sent (between planned visits) to the oncologist and a clinical routine assessment with a CT-scan (every 3-6 months or at investigator’s discretion - standard arm). High risk lung cancer patients without progression and with a 0-2 performance status (PS) after an initial treatment were included. Maintenance chemotherapy or TKI therapy were allowed. In the experimental arm, an email alert was sent to the oncologist when some predefined clinical criteria were fulfilled: an imaging was then quickly prescribed. Early supportive cares were provided if adequate. The primary endpoint was to detect an improvement of 12% in 9 months survival in favor of the experimental arm (α = 5%, β = 20%, unilateral test). The boundary for declaring superiority with respect to overall survival at the pre-planned interim analysis was a p-value of less than 0.006. The PS at relapse, the quality of life (QOL) and cost-effectiveness were also investigated. Results: 121 patients were included in the intent-to-test survival analysis (90% were stage III/IV, median age: 65 y): 60 (61) in the experimental (standard) arms with equivalent baseline characteristics. Median follow-up was 9 months. Median overall survival in months was 19 (11.8), p=0.0014 (n  =  121; HR  =  0.33; 95 % CI, 0.16-0.67) and the PS at the first relapse was 0-1 for 81.5% (35.3%) of the patients (p<0.001) in the experimental (standard) arm. Conclusions: This trial shows a significant survival improvement using Web-application-guided follow-up that allowed better PS at relapse, earlier supportive care and reduction of routine imaging. QOL and cost analysis results will be presented during the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT02361099.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document