scholarly journals Long-term quality of life after definitive treatment for prostate cancer: patient-reported outcomes in the second posttreatment decade

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (7) ◽  
pp. 1827-1836 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanne W. Jang ◽  
Michael R. Drumm ◽  
Jason A. Efstathiou ◽  
Jonathan J. Paly ◽  
Andrzej Niemierko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patient ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Prostate Cancer Patient ◽  
Definitive Treatment ◽  
Patient Reported

Quality of life after pelvic radiotherapy with hypofractionated IMRT boost and long-term hormone therapy for locally advanced prostate cancer.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 75-75
Author(s):  
H. C. Quon ◽  
P. Cheung ◽  
D. A. Loblaw ◽  
G. Morton ◽  
E. Szumacher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Hormonal Therapy ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Summary Score ◽  
Patient Reported

75 Background: Combined radiotherapy (RT) and long-term hormonal therapy (HT) is a standard treatment option for high-risk prostate cancer. Dose escalated RT alone has been shown to improve disease free survival. Increased sensitivity of prostate cancer to high doses per fraction has led to hypofractionation as a method to radiobiologically escalate dose.We report on the quality of life of patients treated with combined hypofractionated RT and HT. Methods: A prospective phase I/II study enrolling patients with any of: clinical T3, PSA ≥20, or Gleason 8-10. Forty-five Gy (1.8 Gy/fraction) was delivered to the pelvic nodes with a concomitant 22.5 Gy intensity-modulated RT boost to the prostate, for a total of 67.5 Gy (2.7 Gy/fraction) in 25 fractions over 5 weeks. Hormonal therapy was administered for 2-3 years. Patient reported outcomes were measured at baseline and every 6 months using the validated Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) questionnaire, which measures urinary, bowel, sexual, and hormonal domains. Results: Sixty patients with a minimum 24 months of patient-reported outcomes were analyzed. Mean scores comparing baseline to 24 month values are reported. There were no statistically significant changes in the urinary summary scores (86.3 vs. 86.0, p=0.45) or any of the urinary subscales (function, bother, incontinence, irritative/obstructive). Domain summary score decreases were observed in: bowel by 4.4% (94.7 vs. 90.3, p<0.01), sexual by 27% (44.5 vs. 17.5, p<0.01), and hormonal by 11.9% (93.1 vs. 81.2, p<0.01). Examining time trends in outcomes, most changes occurred within the first 6 months with smaller changes thereafter. Conclusions: Hypofractionated RT combined with long-term HT is associated with good patient-reported urinary and bowel outcomes at 24 months. Sexual and hormonal summary scores are affected, largely due to continued androgen deprivation therapy. Further follow-up is needed to document patient reported outcomes after testosterone recovery. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Compliance of subjects using electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePRO) in multinational prostate trials.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 232-232
Author(s):  
Susan M. Dallabrida
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Quality Data ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Clinic Visits

232 Background: Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO) and electronic PRO (ePRO) are increasingly becoming an important aspect of cancer clinical trials and patient care, especially with regard to measuring drug efficacy, patient quality of life and drug safety. Subject compliance with completion of PRO/ePRO assessments is an important component for obtaining accurate and high-quality data when conducting clinical trials. It has been hypothesized that patient health status, length of time in a trial and country of origin, may affect compliance. Methods: To address this hypothesis, an operational analysis was conducted to assess oncology subject completion compliance of PRO reports using an electronic tablet to determine its suitability and performance in use. Toward this objective, the compliance of prostate cancer patients in completing three electronic questionnaires that were administered at clinic visits was evaluated. Subjects were asked to complete the Brief Pain Inventory – Short Form (BPI-SF) at every clinic visit. At some clinic visits, subjects were asked to additionally complete the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Prostate (FACT-P) and the Euro Quality of Life 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D). Questionnaires were completed electronically on the tablet. Percent completion was calculated as the number of questionnaires completed divided by the number of questionnaires expected, based on attended clinic visits compiled for this review and the administration schedule for the questionnaires. Results: This review draws on the experience of over 1,000 subjects from 21 countries, and describes the individual and overall compliance with the expected questionnaire completion, the variance between subsequent visits, and compliance by country. Conclusions: The collection of ePRO using a clinic-based tablet yielded a highly complete data set in prostate cancer subjects demonstrating that this is an effective and feasible approach for recording symptoms and quality of life assessments.

Evaluating the correlation between early and late quality-of-life declines using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite for Clinical Practice (EPIC-CP) after definitive stereotactic body radiotherapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy, or brachytherapy for prostate cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 214-214
Author(s):  
Jacob Samuel Parzen ◽  
Thomas J Quinn ◽  
Andrew B Thompson ◽  
Peter Chang ◽  
Sean P. Collins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy ◽  
Late Toxicity ◽  
Intensity Modulated ◽  
Patient Reported

214 Background: Multiple authorities including an NCI Taskforce have recommended routine evaluation of patient reported outcomes (PRO) in cancer care. The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite for Clinical Practice (EPIC-CP) is a single-page quality-of-life (QOL) tool which is easily integrated into routine clinical practice. The EPIC-CP has 5 domains (each scored 0-12). The present study evaluated whether early clinically significant changes in EPIC-CP were correlated with later changes in patients undergoing definitive radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer. Methods: A cohort of 979 patients including the PROSTQA study and 3 other institutions with prospective QOL data pooled for analysis were evaluated for patient-reported outcomes. Patients were treated with definitive low-dose rate brachytherapy (n=284), intensity-modulated RT (n=251), or stereotactic body RT (n=444). EPIC-CP scores were derived based upon responses to the EPIC-26. Data were evaluated using minimal clinically important difference (MCID) thresholds to compare QOL at 1-2 months and 24 months from baseline. Univariate analysis was used to assess the correlation between early and late MCID changes. Results: On univariate analysis, early ≥1 MCID change from baseline was strongly associated with a late ≥1 MCID across all 5 domains (urinary incontinence, urinary irritation/obstruction, bowel, sexual, and vitality/hormonal) within EPIC-CP and for the overall EPIC-CP score (Table). When MCID was instead defined as 1 or 3, early toxicity remained predictive of late toxicity for all domains and the overall EPIC-CP score. Conclusions: The EPIC-CP is an easy-to-use QOL assessment with clinically relevant outcomes. Early QOL decline was strongly associated with late QOL decline in patients undergoing definitive RT for prostate cancer across all EPIC-CP domains. Patients with early QOL decline may be candidates for early QOL-based interventions to alleviate their late toxicity burden from treatment. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Assessment of patient-reported outcomes after polytrauma: protocol for a systematic review

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. e017571 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irmela Gnass ◽  
Michaela Ritschel ◽  
Silke Andrich ◽  
Silke Kuske ◽  
Kai Moschinski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Activities Of Daily Living ◽  
Daily Living ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Patient Reported

IntroductionSurvivors of polytrauma experience long-term and short-term burden that influences their lives. The patients’ view of relevant short-term and long-term outcomes should be captured in instruments that measure quality of life and other patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after a polytrauma. The aim of this systematic review is to (1) collect instruments that assess PROs (quality of life, social participation and activities of daily living) during follow-up after polytrauma, (2) describe the instruments’ application (eg, duration of period of follow-up) and (3) investigate other relevant PROs that are also assessed in the included studies (pain, depression, anxiety and cognitive function).Methods and analysisThe systematic review protocol is developed in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols statement. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and the trials registers ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform will be searched. Keywords, for example, ‘polytrauma’, ‘multiple trauma’, ‘quality of life’, ‘activities of daily living’ or ‘pain’ will be used. Publications published between January 2005 and the most recent date (currently: August 2016) will be included. In order to present the latest possible results, an update of the search is conducted before publication. The data extraction and a content analysis will be carried out systematically. A critical appraisal will be performed.Ethics and disseminationFormal ethical approval is not required as primary data will not be collected. The results will be published in a peer-reviewed publication.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42017060825.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document