Reduce institutional risk for actions by students, employees

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Michael Porter
Keyword(s):  
Institutional Risk

Discrepancies in Access and Institutional Risk Tolerance in Heart Transplantation: A National Prospective Open Cohort Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 227 (4) ◽  
pp. S45
Author(s):  
Alejandro Suarez Pierre ◽  
Cecillia Lui ◽  
Xun Zhou ◽  
Charles D. Fraser ◽  
Todd C. Crawford ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Heart Transplantation ◽  
Risk Tolerance ◽  
Institutional Risk

scholarly journals Institutional Risk in Child Protection: Perspective of Professionals

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 371-384
Author(s):  
Ilona Tamutienė ◽  
Vaida Auglytė
Keyword(s):  
Rural Areas ◽  
Child Protection ◽  
Internal Field ◽  
Children And Families ◽  
Level Of Involvement ◽  
Interview Method ◽  
Family Assistance ◽  
Rights Of The Child ◽  
Institutional Risk ◽  
Content Analysis Method

This article focuses on institutional risk factors that relate to the ability of child rights professionals to protect maltreated children. The aim of the article is to reveal the structural threats existing in the system of protection of the child’s rights, which create preconditions for the disclosure of institutional risks. Semi-structured qualitative interview method used. Ten interviews with children's rights protection specialists (CRPS) conducted during March-April 2018. According to the content analysis method, it has been established that the family assistance model for child protection is declarative in nature, due to the lack of services that meet the needs of children and families, and poor accessibility and quality, especially in rural areas, and social work orientation into control. The findings highlighted gaps in inter-agency cooperation in the protection of the child, the low level of involvement of health care, in particular – the treatment of paediatric and addictive diseases. In view of the internal field of the childʼs rights services, it has been highlighted that institutional problems are significantly contributing to the institutional risk: CRPS experienced inadequate methodological assistance and training which not corresponding to the problems encountering in everyday practice, lack of human resources, large workloads, low wages, lack of working methods, lack of stress management. In the context of the ongoing reform of the protection of the rights of the child, it is recommended to eliminate institutional risks, to strengthen services for children and families, and to improve inter-agency cooperation in the protection of the child.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.ppaa.17.3.21953

Managing institutional risk for Veterinary Services

2021 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 545-553
Author(s):  
T.F. RANDOLPH ◽  
G. SOLOMOS
Keyword(s):  
Veterinary Services ◽  
Institutional Risk

Institutional Risk Reduction Survey

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tahiru Azaaviele Liedong ◽  
Tazeeb Rajwani ◽  
Kamel Mellahi
Keyword(s):  
Risk Reduction ◽  
Institutional Risk

Young Offenders in Custody: Risk and Adjustment

2005 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 251-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carla Cesaroni ◽  
Michele Peterson-Badali
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Psychosocial Functioning ◽  
Young Person ◽  
Young Offenders ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Institutional Risk ◽  
The Relationship

This article explored results from a study of 113 incarcerated male youths, who were age 12 to 15 at the time of their indexed offense. Using a widely used, normed measure of psychosocial functioning, the study examined the relationship between preexisting risk factors and/or institutional risk factors and adjustment in custody. Preexisting risk or vulnerability significantly predicted adjustment to custody, as did several risk factors within facilities (worry about victimization, perceiving victimization as likely, and experiencing conflicts with inmates as difficult). Risk factors associated with institutional life appeared to contribute to a young person’s adjustment beyond the risk factors a young person may walk into an institution with. One commonly used measure of institutional functioning, number of custodial rule infractions, did not appear to be a valid indicator of how a youth felt or adjusted to a facility. Limitations and implications of the findings are discussed.

Institutional Risk Management Education and Consultation (IRMEC): A Jurisprudent Science Perspective

2007 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 261-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas G. Gutheil ◽  
Eric Y. Drogin ◽  
Rohn S. Friedman
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Clinical Judgment ◽  
Forensic Psychiatry ◽  
Management Education ◽  
Knowledge Bases ◽  
Healthcare Organizations ◽  
Specific Context ◽  
Treatment Interventions ◽  
General Medical Practice ◽  
Institutional Risk

Institutional Risk Management Education and Consultation (IRMEC) represents an application of the combined knowledge bases of occupational and organizational psychiatry, organizational psychology, and forensic psychiatry and psychology, to the specific context of risk management in hospitals and other healthcare organizations. The two primary dimensions of IRMEC are: (1) evaluation and education with respect to psychiatric risk management; and (2) consultation and education with respect to psychiatric aspects of general medical practice. From a “jurisprudent science” perspective, the “science” underlying IRMEC-based treatment interventions is well founded, its “practice” includes harmonizing institutional policy and clinical judgment, and its “roles” are grounded in traditional sources of ethical guidance for psychiatrists and psychologists.

scholarly journals “Technologies of Reflexivity”: Generating Biopolitics and Institutional Risk to Supplement Global Public Health Security

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 658-685
Author(s):  
Mark L FLEAR
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Human Rights ◽  
Global Public Health ◽  
Health Security ◽  
Institutional Risk ◽  
Organisational Identity ◽  
Decision Making Processes ◽  
Scientific Technical ◽  
Multiple Levels

AbstractCritiques of global public health security (GPHS) and proposed solutions tend to overlook the potential of the individuals and groups that are subject to and governed by GPHS – “the governed” – to contribute their “on the ground” knowledge and experience to decision-making in order to improve regulatory responses. This article argues for the development of a more reflexive approach as a way of ensuring the epistemic integration of these knowledges with the scientific-technical knowledges that currently dominate decision-making processes. I identify human rights as the conceptual lens that is most likely to enable reflexivity by the governed and regulators, and understanding and communication between them. The governed can use perceived or actual breaches of human rights to articulate “on the ground” knowledges as institutional risks to reputation and standing and, in turn, threaten the production and legitimation of organisational identity, socio-political orders and projects of rule. The particular sensitivity of regulators to these risks could compel epistemic integration. This more reflexive approach to GPHS promises to improve the knowledge base, efficacy, accountability and legitimacy of decision-making at multiple levels: WHO, EU, national and “on the ground”.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document