Comparing the anatomical consistency of the posterior superior iliac spine to the iliac crest as reference landmarks for the lumbopelvic spine: A retrospective radiological study

2007 ◽  
Vol 20 (7) ◽  
pp. 819-825 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.M. McGaugh ◽  
J.M. Brismée ◽  
G.S. Dedrick ◽  
E.A. Jones ◽  
P.S. Sizer
2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 1150-1155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mickaël Ropars ◽  
Alexandre Zadem ◽  
Xavier Morandi ◽  
Rajiv Kaila ◽  
Raphaël Guillin ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron G. Filler

✓The lordotic region of the lumbar spine is a significant focus of pain and dysfunction in the human body, and its susceptibility to disorders may reflect its substantial reconfiguration during the course of human evolution. The basic anatomy of the lumbar vertebra in Old World Monkeys and Early Miocene apes, or proconsulids, retains typical mammalian architecture. The lumbar vertebra in humans is different in the repositioning of the lumbar transverse process dorsal to the vertebral body rather than originating on the body itself and in the loss of the styloid process that is adjacent to the facets in other primates. These two features appeared in Morotopithecus bishopi 21.6 million years ago, suggesting that this ape is the founder of an upright hominiform lineage. The iliocostalis lumborum muscles migrated onto the iliac crest approximately 18 million years ago, becoming a powerful lateral flexor muscle of the trunk. The posterior superior iliac spine shifted far dorsal to the longissimus insertion in the genus Homo between 1 and 2 million years ago, making this muscle a powerful extensor of the lumbar spine. Functionally, the establishment of strong muscular flexors and extensors adds dynamic compressive stresses to the lumbar disks and also makes these muscles susceptible to strain.


Author(s):  
Anna Malwina Kamelska-Sadowska ◽  
Halina Protasiewicz-Fałdowska ◽  
Katarzyna Zaborowska-Sapeta ◽  
Jacek Józef Nowakowski ◽  
Ireneusz Kowalski

Introduction: Assessing spinal deformities using an X-ray radiation is the method of choice for posture diagnosis. It is also used for the evaluation of the degree of correction, brace fit, and spinal balance as well as for further management decisions. However, multiple X-ray exposures during control visits could be too burdensome for children. Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the precision and repeatability of measurement of the variables obtained by a fast, simple postural evaluation in children by the SpinalMeter. Material and methods: The measurements of the angle of trunk rotation (ATR) and SpinalMeter posture assessments were performed 8 to 10 times in a short period of time (6 s). The overall of 300 photos (SpinalMeter) and 1020 measurements (asymmetry, distance between anthropometric points as well as ATR) were obtained from 6 girls (8–15 years old). The validation study comprised of the repeatability, interclass correlation coefficient (Qw) and relative standard deviation (rSD) measurements. Results and discussion: The measurements of the distance between acromion–popliteal fossa, acromion–iliac crest, and acromion–posterior superior iliac spine obtained by SpinalMeter were clearly repeatable (Qw > 0.9). The scapular and pelvic asymmetry in standing and sitting positions were highly repeatable and had low rSD (e.g. for scapular asymmetry 5.6%–80.3%; Qw > 0.8). Conclusions: The precise and reliable postural biometrical measurements were performed by SpinalMeter in the case of the distance between anthropometric points and asymmetry of pelvis and scapula. These measurements could be useful in the assessment of girl’s posture when visiting the pediatrician.


1994 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saleh M. Shenaq ◽  
Michael J.A. Klebuc

1989 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 257-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carson M. Lewis
Keyword(s):  

Skull Base ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 17 (S 1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pietro Scarone ◽  
Delphine Leclercq ◽  
Francoise Heran ◽  
Hervé Boissonet ◽  
Gilles Robert

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document