Abdominal wall tuberculosis following laparoscopic cholecystectomy

1994 ◽  
Vol 81 (5) ◽  
pp. 719-719 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Jindal ◽  
R. Pandya ◽  
S. S. Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Abdominal Wall

scholarly journals Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy by Using a 2 mm Atraumatic Grasper without Trocar

HPB Surgery ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamil Gulpinar ◽  
Suleyman Ozdemir ◽  
S. Erpulat Ozis ◽  
Turgut Aydin ◽  
Atila Korkmaz
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Abdominal Wall ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Single Port ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Scar Formation ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Skin Scar

Purpose. We present our experience in single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy by using a grasper directly without using a trocar in five patients. Methods and Results. The technique involves the use of Karl Storz 27290F grasper in order to perform gallbladder retraction in single port cholecystectomy. The grasper was introduced directly into the skin through abdominal wall without using any trocar and used to mobilize gallbladder whenever needed during surgery without causing any perforation or leakage of the gallbladder. There were no intraoperative and postoperative complications in 5 patients with the advantages of shorter operation time and almost invisible postoperative skin scar formation. Conclusion. We claim that the use of this instrument in SILS surgery might be advantageous than the conventional placement of sutures for the gallbladder mobilization.

scholarly journals A case of abdominal wall abscess caused by biliary gallstones lost during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

2012 ◽  
Vol 73 (10) ◽  
pp. 2642-2646
Author(s):  
Shuhei UENO ◽  
Nobuhiro TAKASHIMA ◽  
Noriyuki SHINODA ◽  
Hironori SUGIURA ◽  
Takeyasu KATADA ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Abdominal Wall ◽  
Abdominal Wall Abscess

Conventional Pneumoperitoneum Compared with Abdominal Wall Lift for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

1996 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 386
Author(s):  
L. LINDGREN ◽  
A. -M. KOIVUSALO ◽  
I. KELLOKUMPU ◽  
Michele Joseph
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Abdominal Wall

Metastasis of missed cholangiocarcinoma in the left lobethrough abdominal wall laparoscopic port-site and umbilicus after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: case report and literature review

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lesheng Huang ◽  
Hongyi Li ◽  
Jun Chen ◽  
Jinghua Jiang ◽  
Wanchun Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Abdominal Wall ◽  
Malignant Tumor ◽  
Malignant Tumors ◽  
Abdominal Cavity ◽  
Left Lobe ◽  
Port Site ◽  
Laparoscopic Port ◽  
Missed Diagnosis ◽  
Upper Abdominal

Abstract Introduction: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has been widely used by surgeons. However, a serious but rare condition may be happened, which is the missed diagnosis of intraperitoneal malignant tumor. If the malignancy exists, the changes of the abdominal environment or the laparoscopic operation might brought the cancer cells to the abdominal cavity or the abdominal wall. The missed laparoscopic malignant tumors are prone to metastasis, especially at the laparoscopic port-site. More extreme condition will be located in the navel, which is known as Sister Mary Joseph’s nodule(SMJN).Case presentation: A 63-year-old female who had undergone cholecystectomy and choledocholithotomy ten months ago was hospitalized for upper abdominal pain. Laboratory examination indicated that the most of tumor markers were increased. CT scan revealed that there was a diffused irregular and progressively enhanced mass around the left lobe bile duct, multiple enlarged lymph nodes in the abdominal cavity and multiple nodular lesions were found under the costal margin of the right upper abdominal wall, right lower abdominal wall and the umbilicus. Biopsy of the nodules under the original surgical scar showed an infiltrative or metastatic middle differentiated adenocarcinoma. So the diagnosis was left lobe cholangiocarcinoma of the liver, multiple lymph nodes metastasis in the abdominal cavity and multiple implant metastasis in abdominal wall laparoscopic port-site and umbilical.Conclusion: In laparoscopic cholecystectomy, surgeons should not only focus on the local lesions, like gallstone in biliary system, but also look around other the tissues and organs to avoid missing the abdominal malignant tumor or other lesions. When atypical symptoms or abnormalities have been found pre-operation, all abdominal organs should be evaluated in detail to avoid missed diagnosis of potential malignant tumors. On the other hand, when there is a nodule in the umbilicus, all the organs and tissues in abdomen should be examined to find the potential malignant tumor. Finally, multiple cholelithiasis in the left lobe of the liver should be regarded as a high risk factor for cholangiocarcinoma.

scholarly journals Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Combined Using Miniaturised Instruments in Transgastric Gall Bladder Removal: Performed on 63 Patients

2010 ◽  
Vol 2010 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Florent Jurczak ◽  
Jean-Paul Pousset
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Gall Bladder ◽  
Abdominal Wall ◽  
Gastric Wall ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Natural Orifice ◽  
Trocar Site ◽  
Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction ◽  
Endoscopic Clipping

Background. The laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a perfectly codified surgical procedure. The development of recent innovative and experimental surgical techniques Natural Orifice transluminal endoscopic surger (N.O.T.E.S.) which reduces the abdominal wall trauma leads us to develop a combined procedure of a standard dissection using miniaturised instruments already existing on the market (3 and 5 mm wide) and a gall bladder removal through a short gastrotomy Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction (N.O.S.E.).Methods. Our objective was to evaluate the safety, the feasibility, and the reproducibility of our new approach. After reviewing existing products on the market and a feasibility study, we put in place a protocol in our structure for patients on whom the procedure was performed. We carried out a gall bladder removal by a short gastrotomy, located on the anterior gastric wall, which then reduced the abdominal wall trauma and allowed them to resume normal physical activity quickly without risk of trocar site hernia.Results. We performed the procedure described in this paper on 63 patients, between April 2008 and July 2009. There were 14 men and 49 women with an average age of 46.8 years (ranging from 28 to 77) and an average BMI of 27.2. 30 patients had at least one gallstone larger than 10 mm. There was no postoperative gastric or abdominal wall complication and a fast recovery for all the patients in our study.Conclusions. This procedure is feasible, reproducible, with good results and minimal abdominal wall trauma. It is also safer than N.O.T.E.S. and endoscopic clipping and recovery, allowing normal physical activity, fast and, without risk of incisional hernia.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document