scholarly journals Quality of life in a randomized trial of early closure of temporary ileostomy after rectal resection for cancer (EASY trial)

2017 ◽  
Vol 105 (3) ◽  
pp. 244-251 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Park ◽  
A. K. Danielsen ◽  
E. Angenete ◽  
D. Bock ◽  
A. C. Marinez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Rectal Resection ◽  
Temporary Ileostomy ◽  
Early Closure

scholarly journals Cost analysis in a randomized trial of early closure of a temporary ileostomy after rectal resection for cancer (EASY trial)

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-76
Author(s):  
Jennifer Park ◽  
Eva Angenete ◽  
David Bock ◽  
Adiela Correa-Marinez ◽  
Anne K. Danielsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cost Analysis ◽  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Rectal Resection ◽  
Temporary Ileostomy ◽  
Early Closure

scholarly journals Quality of Life and Bowel Function Following Early Closure of a Temporary Ileostomy in Patients with Rectal Cancer: A Report from a Single-Center Randomized Controlled Trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 768
Author(s):  
Audrius Dulskas ◽  
Vidas Petrauskas ◽  
Justas Kuliavas ◽  
Klaudija Bickaite ◽  
Mikalojus Kairys ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Bowel Function ◽  
Low Anterior Resection Syndrome ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Temporary Ileostomy ◽  
Eortc Qlq C30 ◽  
Early Closure ◽  
Eortc Qlq

The aim of this study was to assess quality of life and bowel function in patients undergoing early vs. standard ileostomy closure. We retrospectively assessed patients from our previous randomized controlled trial. Patients with a temporary ileostomy who underwent rectal cancer surgery and did not have anastomotic leakage or other. Early closure (EC; 30 days after creation) and standard closure (SC; 90 days after creation) of ileostomy were compared. Thirty-six months (17–97) after stoma closure, we contacted patients by phone and filled in two questionnaires—The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score. This index trial was not powered to assess the difference in bowel function between the two groups. All the patients in the SC group had anastomosis <6 cm from the anal verge compared to 42 of 43 (97.7%) in the EC group. There were no statistically significant differences between EC (26 patients) and SC (25 patients) groups in the EORTC QLQ-C30 and LARS questionnaires. Global quality of life was 37.2 (0–91.7; ±24.9) in the EC group vs. 34.3 (0–100; ±16.2) in the SC (p = 0.630). Low anterior resection syndrome was present in 46% of patients in the EC and 56% in the SC group (p = 0.858). Major LARS was found more often in younger patients. However, no statistical significance was found (p = 0.364). The same was found with quality of life (p = 0.219). Age, gender, ileostomy closure timing, neoadjuvant treatment, complications had no effect of worse bowel function or quality of life. There was no difference in quality of life or bowel function in the late postoperative period after the early vs. late closure of ileostomy based on two questionnaires and small sample size. None of our assessed risk factors had a negative effect on bowel function o quality of life.

scholarly journals “Randomized trial of physical activity on quality of life and lung cancer biomarkers in patients with advanced stage lung cancer: a pilot study”

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Brett C. Bade ◽  
Geliang Gan ◽  
Fangyong Li ◽  
Lingeng Lu ◽  
Lynn Tanoue ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Physical Activity ◽  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Cancer Biomarkers ◽  
Advanced Stage ◽  
Home Based ◽  
Advanced Stage Lung Cancer ◽  
Stage Lung Cancer

Abstract Background Lung cancer survivors need more options to improve quality of life (QoL). It is unclear to what extent patients with advanced stage disease are willing to participate in home-based physical activity (PA) and if these interventions improve QoL. The goal of our study was to determine interest in participating in our 3-month home-based walking regimen in patients with advanced stage lung cancer. We used a randomized design to evaluate for potential benefit in PA and patient-reported outcomes. Methods We performed an open-label, 1:1 randomized trial in 40 patients with stage III/IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) evaluating enrollment rate, PA, QoL, dyspnea, depression, and biomarkers. Compared to usual care (UC), the intervention group (IG) received an accelerometer, in-person teaching session, and gain-framed text messages for 12 weeks. Results We enrolled 56% (40/71) of eligible patients. Participants were on average 65 years and enrolled 1.9 years from diagnosis. Most patients were women (75%), and receiving treatment (85%) for stage IV (73%) adenocarcinoma (83%). A minority of patients were employed part-time or full time (38%). Both groups reported low baseline PA (IG mean 37 (Standard deviation (SD) 46) vs UC 59 (SD 56) minutes/week; p = 0.25). The IG increased PA more than UC (mean change IG + 123 (SD 212) vs UC + 35 (SD 103) minutes/week; p = 0.051)). Step count in the IG was not statistically different between baseline (4707 step/day), week 6 (5605; p = 0.16), and week 12 (4606 steps/day; p = 0.87). The intervention improved EORTC role functioning domain (17 points; p = 0.022) with borderline improvement in dyspnea (− 13 points; p = 0.051) compared to UC. In patients with two blood samples (25%), we observed a significant increase in soluble PD-1 (219.8 (SD 54.5) pg/mL; p < 0.001). Conclusions Our pilot trial using a 3-month, home-based, mobile health intervention enrolled over half of eligible patients with stage III and IV NSCLC. The intervention increased PA, and may improve several aspects of QoL. We also identified potential biomarker changes relevant to lung cancer biology. Future research should use a larger sample to examine the effect of exercise on cancer biomarkers, which may mediate the association between PA and QoL. Clinical trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03352245).

Impact of temporary ileostomy on long‐term quality of life and bowel function: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 90 (5) ◽  
pp. 687-692
Author(s):  
Celia Keane ◽  
Puja Sharma ◽  
Lance Yuan ◽  
Ian Bissett ◽  
Greg O'Grady
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Bowel Function ◽  
Temporary Ileostomy
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document