scholarly journals Quality of life, symptoms and treatment satisfaction in patients with aortic aneurysm using new abdominal aortic aneurysm-specific patient-reported outcome measures

2016 ◽  
Vol 103 (8) ◽  
pp. 1012-1019 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Peach ◽  
J. Romaine ◽  
P. J. E. Holt ◽  
M. M. Thompson ◽  
C. Bradley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Treatment Satisfaction ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Specific Patient ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
Patient Reported

scholarly journals Quality improvement in vascular access: The role of patient-reported outcome measures

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melanie Field ◽  
Karen Tullett ◽  
Aurangzaib Khawaja ◽  
Robert Jones ◽  
Nicholas G Inston
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Vascular Access ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Specific Patient ◽  
Patient Reported

Quality improvement initiatives should be aimed to enhance clinical outcomes, service delivery and quality of life for patients. For patients reliant on haemodialysis, vascular access is a lifeline. Survival differences relating to the type of vascular access are evident and many initiatives have focussed on increasing absolute rates of arteriovenous fistulas and/or decreasing central venous catheter use. While these have achieved some success quantitatively, the qualitative effects are less obvious. The aims of this review article are to explore the concepts of quality of care in vascular access. There is a paucity of studies into the effects of vascular access on the quality of life of dialysis patients, and where studies have been performed, generalised patient-reported outcome measures have been used. To facilitate the implementation of quality improvement programmes specifically for vascular access requires suitable tools. While existing patient-reported outcome measures may be applicable to vascular access, it is likely that these will require further evaluation, and the development of vascular access–specific patient-reported outcome measures may be required.

scholarly journals Improving CKD-Specific Patient-Reported Measures of Health-Related Quality of Life

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 664-677 ◽  
Author(s):  
John E. Ware ◽  
Michelle M. Richardson ◽  
Klemens B. Meyer ◽  
Barbara Gandek
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Clinical Status ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Comorbid Condition ◽  
Adaptive Tests ◽  
Specific Patient ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Mean Differences

BackgroundPatient-reported outcome measures that are more practical and clinically useful are needed for patients with CKD. We compared a new CKD-specific quality-of-life impact scale (CKD-QOL) with currently used measures.MethodsPatients (n=485) in different treatment groups (nondialysis stages 3–5, on dialysis, or post-transplant) completed the kidney-specific CKD-QOL and Kidney Disease Quality of Life-36 (KDQOL-36) forms and the generic SF-12 Health Survey at baseline and 3 months. New items summarizing quality of life (QOL) impact attributed to CKD across six QOL domains yielded single impact scores from a six-item static (fixed-length) form and from computerized adaptive tests (CATs) with three to six items. Validity tests compared the CKD-QOL, KDQOL-36 (Burden, Effects, and Symptoms/Problems subscales), and generic SF-12 measures across groups in four tests of clinical status and clinician assessment of change (CKD-specific tests), and number of comorbidities. ANOVA was used to test for group mean differences, variances in each measure explained by groups, and relative validity (RV) in comparison with the referent KDQOL-36 Burden subscale.ResultsKDQOL-36 and CKD-QOL measures generally discriminated better than generic SF-12v2 measures. The pattern of variances across CKD-specific tests comparing validity favored CKD-QOL two-fold over KDQOL-36. Two RV test results confirmed CKD-QOL improvements over the referent KDQOL scale. Results for static and CAT CKD-QOL forms were similar. SF-12 Physical and KDQOL-36 Symptoms scores worsened with increasing comorbid condition counts.ConclusionsOverall, compared with the KDQOL-36, the new approach to summarizing CKD-specific QOL impact performed better across multiple tests of validity. CAT surveys were more efficient than static surveys.

scholarly journals Patient-reported quality of life after abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery: A prospective comparison of endovascular and open repair

2006 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 1182-1187.e2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Badr Aljabri ◽  
Khalifa Al Wahaibi ◽  
Deborah Abner ◽  
Kent S. Mackenzie ◽  
Marc-Michel Corriveau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Open Repair ◽  
Aneurysm Surgery ◽  
Prospective Comparison ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Aortic Aneurysm Surgery

Significance of patient-reported outcomes for occupational resumption and quality of life after cardiac rehabilitation

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Salzwedel ◽  
I Koran ◽  
E Langheim ◽  
A Schlitt ◽  
J Nothroff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Physical Performance ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Returning To Work

Abstract Introduction Comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programs based on the bio-psycho-social approach of the international classification of functioning and disease are carried out to achieve improved prognosis, superior health-related quality of life (HRQL) and social integration. We aimed to identify predictors of returning to work (RTW) and HRQL among cardiovascular risk factors and physical performance as well as patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) modifiable during CR. Methods We designed a prospective observational multi-center study and enrolled 1,586 patients (2017/18) in 12 German rehabilitation centers regardless of their primary allocation diagnoses (e.g. acute myocardial infarction (AMI), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), coronary artery disease (CAD), valvular disease). Besides general data (e.g. age, gender, diagnoses), parameters of risk factor management (e.g. smoking, lipid profile, hypertension, lifestyle change motivation), physical performance (e.g. maximum exercise capacity, endurance training load, 6-min walking distance), and PROMs (e.g. depression, heart-focused anxiety, HRQL, subjective well-being, somatic and mental health, pain, general self-efficacy, pension desire as well as self-assessment of occupational prognosis using several questionnaires) were documented at CR admission and discharge. 6 months after discharge, status of RTW and HRQL (SF-12) were captured by a follow-up (FU) survey and analyzed in multivariable regression models with multiple imputation of missing values. Results Out of the study participants, 1,262 patients (54±7 years, 77% men) responded to the follow-up survey and could be analyzed regarding the outcome parameters. Most of them were assigned to CR primarily due to AMI (40%) or CAD without myocardial infarction (18%), followed by heart valve diseases in 12% of patients and CABG (8%). 864 patients (69%) returned to work within the follow-up period. Pension desire, negative self-assessed occupational prognosis, heart-focussed anxiety, major life events, smoking and heart failure were negatively associated with RTW, while higher endurance training load, HRQL and work stress were positively associated (Figure 1). HRQL after 6 months was determined more by PROMs (e.g. pension desire, heart-focused anxiety, physical/mental HRQL in SF-12, physical/mental health in indicators of rehab-status questionnaire (IRES-24), stress, well-being in the World Health Organization well-being index and self-efficacy expectations) than by clinical parameters or physical performance. Conclusions Patient-reported outcome measures predominantly influenced RTW and HRQL in heart-disease patients, whereas patients' pension desire and heart-focussed anxiety had a dominant impact on all investigated endpoints. Therefore, the multi-component CR approach focussing on psychosocial support is crucial for subjective health prognosis and occupational resumption. Figure 1. Predictors of returning to work Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): German pension insurance

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document