Involvement of a cell size control mechanism in the induction and maintenance of oscillations in continuous cultures of budding yeast

1990 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 453-459 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enzo Martegani ◽  
Danilo Porro ◽  
Bianca Maria Ranzi ◽  
Lilia Alberghina
PLoS Biology ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 7 (10) ◽  
pp. e1000221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano Di Talia ◽  
Hongyin Wang ◽  
Jan M. Skotheim ◽  
Adam P. Rosebrock ◽  
Bruce Futcher ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen Jia ◽  
Abhyudai Singh ◽  
Ramon Grima

Unlike many single-celled organisms, the growth of fission yeast cells within a cell cycle is not exponential. It is rather characterized by three distinct phases (elongation, septation and fission), each with a different growth rate. Experiments also show that the distribution of cell size in a lineage is often bimodal, unlike the unimodal distributions measured for the bacterium Escherichia coli. Here we construct a detailed stochastic model of cell size dynamics in fission yeast. The theory leads to analytic expressions for the cell size and the birth size distributions, and explains the origin of bimodality seen in experiments. In particular our theory shows that the left peak in the bimodal distribution is associated with cells in the elongation phase while the right peak is due to cells in the septation and fission phases. We show that the size control strategy, the variability in the added size during a cell cycle and the fraction of time spent in each of the three cell growth phases have a strong bearing on the shape of the cell size distribution. Furthermore we infer all the parameters of our model by matching the theoretical cell size and birth size distributions to those from experimental single cell time-course data for seven different growth conditions. Our method provides a much more accurate means of determining the cell size control strategy (timer, adder or sizer) than the standard method based on the slope of the best linear fit between the birth and division sizes. We also show that the variability in added size and the strength of cell size control of fission yeast depend weakly on the temperature but strongly on the culture medium.


Author(s):  
Stefano Talia ◽  
Hongyin Wang ◽  
Jan Skotheim ◽  
Adam Rosebrock ◽  
Bruce Futcher ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Felix Barber ◽  
Ariel Amir ◽  
Andrew W. Murray

AbstractCells must couple cell cycle progress to their growth rate to restrict the spread of cell sizes present throughout a population. Linear, rather than exponential, accumulation of Whi5, was proposed to provide this coordination by causing a higher Whi5 concentration in cells born at smaller size. We tested this model using the inducible GAL1 promoter to make the Whi5 concentration independent of cell size. At an expression level that equalizes the mean cell size with that of wild-type cells, the size distributions of cells with galactose-induced Whi5 expression and wild-type cells are indistinguishable. Fluorescence microscopy confirms that the endogenous and GAL1 promoters produce different relationships between Whi5 concentration and cell volume without diminishing size control in the G1 phase. We also expressed Cln3 from the GAL1 promoter, finding that the spread in cell sizes for an asynchronous population is unaffected by this perturbation. Our findings contradict the previously proposed model for cell size control in budding yeast and demonstrate the need for a molecular mechanism that explains how cell size controls passage through Start.Author ContributionsFB performed the experiments, data analysis and simulations. All authors designed the experiments and wrote the manuscript.Significance StatementDespite decades of research, the question of how single cells regulate their size remains unclear. Here we demonstrate that a widely supported molecular model for the fundamental origin of size control in budding yeast is inconsistent with a set of experiments testing the model’s key prediction. We therefore conclude that the problem of cell size control in budding yeast remains unsolved. This work highlights the need for rigorous testing of future models of size control in order to make progress on this fundamental question.


2000 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. 488-492 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Kondorosi ◽  
François Roudier ◽  
Emmanuel Gendreau

2019 ◽  
Vol 117 (9) ◽  
pp. 1728-1738 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Facchetti ◽  
Benjamin Knapp ◽  
Fred Chang ◽  
Martin Howard

Author(s):  
David A Guertin ◽  
David M Sabatini

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document