Cell cycle checkpoints, DNA repair and DNA replication strategies

BioEssays ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Stephen Downes ◽  
Adam S. Wilkins
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoints

scholarly journals Human Exonuclease 1 (EXO1) Regulatory Functions in DNA Replication with Putative Roles in Cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guido Keijzers ◽  
Daniela Bakula ◽  
Michael Petr ◽  
Nils Madsen ◽  
Amanuel Teklu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Cellular Transformation ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoints ◽  
Replication Process ◽  
Exonuclease 1 ◽  
Repair Pathways ◽  
Regulatory Functions

Human exonuclease 1 (EXO1), a 5′→3′ exonuclease, contributes to the regulation of the cell cycle checkpoints, replication fork maintenance, and post replicative DNA repair pathways. These processes are required for the resolution of stalled or blocked DNA replication that can lead to replication stress and potential collapse of the replication fork. Failure to restart the DNA replication process can result in double-strand breaks, cell-cycle arrest, cell death, or cellular transformation. In this review, we summarize the involvement of EXO1 in the replication, DNA repair pathways, cell cycle checkpoints, and the link between EXO1 and cancer.

scholarly journals Polycomb proteins control proliferation and transformation independently of cell cycle checkpoints by regulating DNA replication

2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Piunti ◽  
Alessandra Rossi ◽  
Aurora Cerutti ◽  
Mareike Albert ◽  
Sriganesh Jammula ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoints ◽  
Polycomb Proteins

scholarly journals Extensive loss of cell cycle and DNA repair genes in an ancient lineage of bipolar budding yeasts

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob L. Steenwyk ◽  
Dana A. Opulente ◽  
Jacek Kominek ◽  
Xing-Xing Shen ◽  
Xiaofan Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Gc Content ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoints ◽  
Pyrimidine Dimer ◽  
Genome Integrity ◽  
Checkpoint Pathway ◽  
Accelerated Evolution ◽  
Ancient Lineage

AbstractCell cycle checkpoints and DNA repair processes protect organisms from potentially lethal mutational damage. Compared to other budding yeasts in the subphylum Saccharomycotina, we noticed that a lineage in the genus Hanseniaspora exhibited very high evolutionary rates, low GC content, small genome sizes, and lower gene numbers. To better understand Hanseniaspora evolution, we analyzed 25 genomes, including 11 newly sequenced, representing 18 / 21 known species in the genus. Our phylogenomic analyses identify two Hanseniaspora lineages, the fast-evolving lineage (FEL), which began diversifying ∼87 million years ago (mya), and the slow-evolving lineage (SEL), which began diversifying ∼54 mya. Remarkably, both lineages lost genes associated with the cell cycle and genome integrity, but these losses were greater in the FEL. For example, all species lost the cell cycle regulator WHI5, and the FEL lost components of the spindle checkpoint pathway (e.g., MAD1, MAD2) and DNA damage checkpoint pathway (e.g., MEC3, RAD9). Similarly, both lineages lost genes involved in DNA repair pathways, including the DNA glycosylase gene MAG1, which is part of the base excision repair pathway, and the DNA photolyase gene PHR1, which is involved in pyrimidine dimer repair. Strikingly, the FEL lost 33 additional genes, including polymerases (i.e., POL4 and POL32) and telomere-associated genes (e.g., RIF1, RFA3, CDC13, PBP2). Echoing these losses, molecular evolutionary analyses reveal that, compared to the SEL, the FEL stem lineage underwent a burst of accelerated evolution, which resulted in greater mutational loads, homopolymer instabilities, and higher fractions of mutations associated with the common endogenously damaged base, 8-oxoguanine. We conclude that Hanseniaspora is an ancient lineage that has diversified and thrived, despite lacking many otherwise highly conserved cell cycle and genome integrity genes and pathways, and may represent a novel system for studying cellular life without them.

scholarly journals Correlation between DNA synthesis in the second, third and fourth generations of spermatogonia and the occurrence of apoptosis in both spermatogonia and spermatocytes

Reproduction ◽  
2003 ◽  
pp. 661-668 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Blanco-Rodriguez ◽  
C Martinez-Garcia ◽  
A Porras
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Functional Significance ◽  
Tunel Assay ◽  
Seminiferous Epithelium ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoints ◽  
Clear Correlation ◽  
Cellular Events ◽  
Dna Strand

In the seminiferous epithelium, both DNA synthesis and apoptosis occur at equivalent stages in various species, with apoptosis taking place mainly at the same stages as DNA replication in the second, third and fourth spermatogonial generations. As preservation of the cellular associations found at these stages may have some functional significance, it is important to determine whether there is a correlation between these cellular events. In this study, pairs of immunoperoxidase-stained adjacent testis sections from rats, mice, rabbits and cats in which either bromodeoxyuridine incorporated into the newly synthesized DNA strand (BrdU labelling) or DNA 3' end labelling of the apoptotic DNA fragments (TUNEL assay) were detected were compared. In addition, both events were analysed in double-labelled sections. These two methods revealed a clear correlation between the occurrence of DNA replication in the second to fourth generations of spermatogonia and most physiological apoptosis taking place in both spermatogonia and spermatocytes in the three different mammalian orders (Rodentia, Lagomorpha and Carnivora). This correlation may result from the synchronization of mitotic spermatogonial and meiotic spermatocyte cell cycle checkpoints operating at these stages.

scholarly journals ATR kinase is required for global genomic nucleotide excision repair exclusively during S phase in human cells

2008 ◽  
Vol 105 (46) ◽  
pp. 17896-17901 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yannick Auclair ◽  
Raphael Rouget ◽  
El Bachir Affar ◽  
Elliot A. Drobetsky
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Nucleotide Excision Repair ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Human Tumor ◽  
Chemotherapeutic Agents ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoints ◽  
Lung Fibroblasts ◽  
Nucleotide Excision

Global-genomic nucleotide excision repair (GG-NER) is the only pathway available to humans for removal, from the genome overall, of highly genotoxic helix-distorting DNA adducts generated by many environmental mutagens and certain chemotherapeutic agents, e.g., UV-induced 6–4 photoproducts (6–4PPs) and cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs). The ataxia telangiectasia and rad-3-related kinase (ATR) is rapidly activated in response to UV-induced replication stress and proceeds to phosphorylate a plethora of downstream effectors that modulate primarily cell cycle checkpoints but also apoptosis and DNA repair. To investigate whether this critical kinase might participate in the regulation of GG-NER, we developed a novel flow cytometry-based DNA repair assay that allows precise evaluation of GG-NER kinetics as a function of cell cycle. Remarkably, inhibition of ATR signaling in primary human lung fibroblasts by treatment with caffeine, or with siRNA specifically targeting ATR, resulted in total inhibition of 6–4PP removal during S phase, whereas cells repaired normally during either G0/G1 or G2/M. Similarly striking S-phase-specific defects in GG-NER of both 6–4PPs and CPDs were documented in ATR-deficient Seckel syndrome skin fibroblasts. Finally, among six diverse model human tumor strains investigated, three manifested complete abrogation of 6–4PP repair exclusively in S-phase populations. Our data reveal a highly novel role for ATR in the regulation of GG-NER uniquely during S phase of the cell cycle, and indicate that many human cancers may be characterized by a defect in this regulation.

Effect of inhibitors of DNA replication on early zebrafish embryos: evidence for coordinate activation of multiple intrinsic cell-cycle checkpoints at the mid-blastula transition

Zygote ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 153-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Ikegami ◽  
Alma K. Rivera-Bennetts ◽  
Deborah L. Brooker ◽  
Thomas D. Yager
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Adaptive Response ◽  
Topoisomerase I ◽  
Topoisomerase Ii ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoints ◽  
Zebrafish Embryos ◽  
Replication Process ◽  
Inhibition Of Dna Synthesis

SummaryWe address the developmental activation, in the zebrafish embryo, of intrinsic cell-cycle checkpoints which monitor the DNA replication process and progression through the cell cycle. Eukaryotic DNA replication is probably carried out by a multiprotein complex containing numerous enzymes and accessory factors that act in concert to effect processive DNA synthesis (Applegren, N. et al. (1995) J. Cell. Biochem. 59, 91–107). We have exposed early zebrafish embryos to three chemical agents which are predicted to specifically inhibit the DNA polymerase α, topoisomerase I and topoisomerase II components of the DNA replication complex. We present four findings: (1) Before mid-blastula transition (MBT) an inhibition of DNA synthesis does not block cells from attempting to proceed through mitosis, implying the lack of functional checkpoints. (2) After MBT, the embryo displays two distinct modes of intrinsic checkpoint operation. One mode is a rapid and complete stop of cell division, and the other is an ‘adaptive’ response in which the cell cycle continues to operate, perhaps in a ‘repair’ mode, to generate daughter nuclei with few visible defects. (3) The embryo does not display a maximal capability for the ‘adaptive’ response until several hours after MBT, which is consistent with a slow rranscriptional control mechanism for checkpoint activation. (4) The slow activation of checkpoints at MBT provides a window of time during which inhibitors of DNA synthesis will induce cytogenetic lesions without killing the embryo. This could be useful in the design of a deletion-mutagenesis strategy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document