Impact of video content and resolution on the cognitive dynamics of surveillance decision‐making

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary E. Frame ◽  
Anna M. Maresca ◽  
Alan S. Boydstun ◽  
Rik Warren
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Video Content ◽  
Cognitive Dynamics

scholarly journals Eye Gazes Based on Associative Relevance Assist in Decision Making Processes during Scene Perception

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 74
Author(s):  
Gufran Ahmad
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Information Processing ◽  
Eye Movements ◽  
Visual Perception ◽  
Eye Tracking ◽  
Scene Perception ◽  
Cognitive Dynamics ◽  
Movement Data ◽  
Business Applications ◽  
Decision Making Processes

<p>Research studies on eye movements in area of information processing task, such as scene perception have recently advanced towards understandings of underlying visual perception mechanism and human cognitive dynamics. Besides, business applications of eye tracking are endlessly revealing groundbreaking trends based on practical scenarios. In this study, we conducted a number of eye tracking experiments to establish our hypothesis that the eye gazes based on the associative relevance found within the contexts of scenes during scene perception significantly supported the processes of decision making. The collected eye movement data from participants who viewed artistic scenes discovered that the tracks of eye gazes traversed along the existing associative relevance among the elements of scenes for decision making processes. These experimental evidences confirmed our hypothesis that the eye gazes based on associative relevance assisted in decision making processes during scene perception.</p>

scholarly journals Associative Relevance Based Eye Fixations Enhance Decision Making Processes in Scene Perception

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Gufran Ahmad
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Information Processing ◽  
Eye Movements ◽  
Eye Tracking ◽  
Scene Perception ◽  
Cognitive Dynamics ◽  
Movement Data ◽  
Business Applications ◽  
Eye Fixations ◽  
Decision Making Processes

<p>Recent research studies on eye movements in area of information processing task, such as scene perception have magnificently advanced towards understandings of underlying visual perception mechanism and human cognitive dynamics. Besides, business applications of eye tracking are unceasingly revealing innovative trends based on pragmatic scenarios. In this study, we conducted a number of eye tracking experiments to establish our hypothesis that the eye fixations based on the associative relevance found within the contexts of scenes during scene perception significantly bettered the processes of decision-making. The collected eye movement data from participants who viewed artistic scenes discovered that the tracks of eye fixations traversed along the existing associative relevance among the elements of scenes for decision-making processes. These experimental evidences confirmed our hypothesis that the associative relevance based eye fixations enhanced decision-making processes in scene perception.</p>

scholarly journals Transient Cognitive Dynamics, Metastability, and Decision Making

2008 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. e1000072 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikhail I. Rabinovich ◽  
Ramón Huerta ◽  
Pablo Varona ◽  
Valentin S. Afraimovich
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Cognitive Dynamics

Discarding optimality: Throwing out the baby with the bathwater?

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Simen ◽  
Fuat Balcı
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Perceptual Decision Making ◽  
Reward Rate ◽  
Perceptual Decision ◽  
Standard Observer ◽  
Rate Maximization ◽  
Reward Rate Maximization ◽  
Descriptive Standard ◽  
Observer Model

AbstractRahnev & Denison (R&D) argue against normative theories and in favor of a more descriptive “standard observer model” of perceptual decision making. We agree with the authors in many respects, but we argue that optimality (specifically, reward-rate maximization) has proved demonstrably useful as a hypothesis, contrary to the authors’ claims.

LPCD framework: Analytical tool or psychological model?

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Danks
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Analytical Tool ◽  
Mathematical Framework ◽  
Bayesian Decision ◽  
Perceptual Decision Making ◽  
Psychological Model ◽  
Psychological Reality ◽  
Psychological Theories ◽  
Target Article ◽  
Bayesian Decision Making

AbstractThe target article uses a mathematical framework derived from Bayesian decision making to demonstrate suboptimal decision making but then attributes psychological reality to the framework components. Rahnev & Denison's (R&D) positive proposal thus risks ignoring plausible psychological theories that could implement complex perceptual decision making. We must be careful not to slide from success with an analytical tool to the reality of the tool components.

Elaborating the role of reflection and individual differences in the study of folk-economic beliefs

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Arceneaux
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Individual Differences ◽  
Cognitive Processes ◽  
Evolutionary History ◽  
Behavioral Responses ◽  
History Of ◽  
Economic Beliefs

AbstractIntuitions guide decision-making, and looking to the evolutionary history of humans illuminates why some behavioral responses are more intuitive than others. Yet a place remains for cognitive processes to second-guess intuitive responses – that is, to be reflective – and individual differences abound in automatic, intuitive processing as well.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document