Lay out clear roles when it comes to performance evaluations

2021 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 8-8
Keyword(s):  
Performance Evaluations

Relationships Between Subjective Ratings and Objective Measures of Performance in Speechreading Sentences

1997 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 900-911 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marilyn E. Demorest ◽  
Lynne E. Bernstein
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Impairment ◽  
Performance Evaluations ◽  
Objective Measures ◽  
Large Individual ◽  
Subjective Ratings ◽  
Objective Performance ◽  
Phonetic Distance ◽  
Stimulus Length ◽  
Measures Of Performance ◽  
Confidence Scale

Ninety-six participants with normal hearing and 63 with severe-to-profound hearing impairment viewed 100 CID Sentences (Davis & Silverman, 1970) and 100 B-E Sentences (Bernstein & Eberhardt, 1986b). Objective measures included words correct, phonemes correct, and visual-phonetic distance between the stimulus and response. Subjective ratings were made on a 7-point confidence scale. Magnitude of validity coefficients ranged from .34 to .76 across materials, measures, and groups. Participants with hearing impairment had higher levels of objective performance, higher subjective ratings, and higher validity coefficients, although there were large individual differences. Regression analyses revealed that subjective ratings are predictable from stimulus length, response length, and objective performance. The ability of speechreaders to make valid performance evaluations was interpreted in terms of contemporary word recognition models.

Summative intern performance evaluations: A wealth of information or a gathering of “two cents”?

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 78-83
Author(s):  
Thad Q. Strom ◽  
Paul Arbisi ◽  
Paul D. Thuras ◽  
Jennie Leskela ◽  
Jacob Finn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Evaluations
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document