Rules for administrator evaluation

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (S9) ◽  
pp. 1-1
Keyword(s):  
Administrator Evaluation

Six Points For Administrator Evaluation

1982 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.L. Monks ◽  
R.J. Roelle
Keyword(s):  
Administrator Evaluation

Evaluating School Principals: Supervisor Ratings of Principal Practice and Principal Job Performance

2018 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 446-472 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason A. Grissom ◽  
Richard S. L. Blissett ◽  
Hajime Mitani
Keyword(s):  
School Leadership ◽  
Evaluation System ◽  
School Principals ◽  
High Stakes ◽  
Administrator Evaluation ◽  
Leadership Quality ◽  
Supervisor Ratings ◽  
Principal Practice ◽  
School Poverty ◽  
Using Data

Numerous studies investigate high-stakes personnel evaluation systems in education, but nearly all focus on evaluation of teachers. We instead examine the evaluation of school principals at scale using data from the first 4 years of implementation of Tennessee’s multiple-measure administrator evaluation system. We focus specifically on the rubric-based practice ratings given by principals’ supervisors that constitute one half of principals’ overall evaluation scores. We find that supervisors’ ratings are internally consistent, relatively stable over time, and predictive of other performance measures, such as student achievement growth and teachers’ ratings of school leadership quality. However, raters fail to differentiate dimensions of principal practice, and ratings may be biased by factors, such as school poverty, outside the principal’s control.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document