Follow this job description for a board chair

2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (S4) ◽  
pp. 2-2
Keyword(s):  
2002 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olga F. Voskuijl ◽  
Tjarda van Sliedregt

Summary: This paper presents a meta-analysis of published job analysis interrater reliability data in order to predict the expected levels of interrater reliability within specific combinations of moderators, such as rater source, experience of the rater, and type of job descriptive information. The overall mean interrater reliability of 91 reliability coefficients reported in the literature was .59. The results of experienced professionals (job analysts) showed the highest reliability coefficients (.76). The method of data collection (job contact versus job description) only affected the results of experienced job analysts. For this group higher interrater reliability coefficients were obtained for analyses based on job contact (.87) than for those based on job descriptions (.71). For other rater categories (e.g., students, organization members) neither the method of data collection nor training had a significant effect on the interrater reliability. Analyses based on scales with defined levels resulted in significantly higher interrater reliability coefficients than analyses based on scales with undefined levels. Behavior and job worth dimensions were rated more reliable (.62 and .60, respectively) than attributes and tasks (.49 and .29, respectively). Furthermore, the results indicated that if nonprofessional raters are used (e.g., incumbents or students), at least two to four raters are required to obtain a reliability coefficient of .80. These findings have implications for research and practice.


1953 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dorothy E. Lenard ◽  
Willard E. North
Keyword(s):  

1953 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dorothy E. Lenard ◽  
Willard E. North
Keyword(s):  

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Verena S. Bonitz ◽  
Lisa M. Larson ◽  
Patrick Ian Armstrong
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Linda Mora Siregar

This study aims to determine the work performance of the finance and accounting division at PT. SPM. The subject of this research is the finance and accounting division. The method in this research uses questionnaire and interview techniques. The results show that job descriptions, job requirements and employee KPIs that are in line with current company conditions can be compiled and determined. Job / job description contains all information regarding job identity, job functions, job authority, duties and main job responsibilities, other tasks, work documents, working conditions, and employment relationships. Keywords: Job Analysis, Work Performance Indocators Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui prestasi kerja divisi finance dan accounting pada PT. SPM. Subjek penelitian ini adalah divisi finance dan accounting. Metode dalam penelitin ini menggunakan teknik koesioner dan wawancara. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa uraian pekerjaan, persyaratan jabatan dan KPI karyawan yang sesuai dengan kondisi perusahaan saat ini dapat disusun dan ditetapkan.Uraian pekerjaan/jabatan memuat semua informasi mengenai identitas jabatan, fungsi jabatan, wewenang jabatan, tugas dan tanggung jawab pokok pekerjaan, tugas-tugas lain, dokumen kerja, kondisi kerja, dan hubungan kerja.   Kata Kunci: Analisi Jabatan, Indikator Prestasi Kerja.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document