Fostering a GREAT Place for Student Success: Critical Component #1, Graduate Our Students and Prepare Them for Post‐degree Roles and Contexts

2021 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 3-15
Author(s):  
Stephen P. Hundley
Keyword(s):  
Student Success ◽  
Critical Component

scholarly journals The Code-Centric Nature of Computational Thinking Education: A Review of Trends and Issues in Computational Thinking Education Research

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vance Kite ◽  
Soonhye Park ◽  
Eric Wiebe
Keyword(s):  
Education Research ◽  
Student Success ◽  
Computational Thinking ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Critical Component ◽  
Future Directions ◽  
Content Integration ◽  
Core Curricula ◽  
Digital Era ◽  
Professional Development For Teachers

<div><div><div><p>Computational thinking (CT) is being recognized as a critical component of student success in the digital era. Many contend that integrating CT into core curricula is the surest method for providing all students with access to CT. However, the CT community lacks an agreed-upon conceptualization of CT that would facilitate this integration, and little effort has been made to critically analyze and synthesize research on CT/content integration (CTCI). Conflicting CT conceptualizations and little understanding of evidence-based strategies for CTCI could result in significant barriers to increasing students’ access to CT. To address these concerns, we analyzed 80 studies on CT education, focusing on both the CT conceptualizations guiding current CT education research and evidence-based strategies for CTCI. Our review highlights the code-centric nature of CT education and reveals significant gaps in our understanding of CTCI and CT professional development for teachers. Based on these findings we propose an approach to operationalizing CT that promotes students’ participation in CT, present promising methods for infusing content with CT, and discuss future directions for CT education research.</p></div></div></div>

scholarly journals The Code-Centric Nature of Computational Thinking Education: A Review of Trends and Issues in Computational Thinking Education Research

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vance Kite ◽  
Soonhye Park ◽  
Eric Wiebe
Keyword(s):  
Education Research ◽  
Student Success ◽  
Computational Thinking ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Critical Component ◽  
Future Directions ◽  
Content Integration ◽  
Core Curricula ◽  
Digital Era ◽  
Professional Development For Teachers

<div><div><div><p>Computational thinking (CT) is being recognized as a critical component of student success in the digital era. Many contend that integrating CT into core curricula is the surest method for providing all students with access to CT. However, the CT community lacks an agreed-upon conceptualization of CT that would facilitate this integration, and little effort has been made to critically analyze and synthesize research on CT/content integration (CTCI). Conflicting CT conceptualizations and little understanding of evidence-based strategies for CTCI could result in significant barriers to increasing students’ access to CT. To address these concerns, we analyzed 80 studies on CT education, focusing on both the CT conceptualizations guiding current CT education research and evidence-based strategies for CTCI. Our review highlights the code-centric nature of CT education and reveals significant gaps in our understanding of CTCI and CT professional development for teachers. Based on these findings we propose an approach to operationalizing CT that promotes students’ participation in CT, present promising methods for infusing content with CT, and discuss future directions for CT education research.</p></div></div></div>

Effective Student-Advisor Engagement and Relationship Building in Online Graduate Programs

2019 ◽  
pp. 176-191
Author(s):  
Jennifer Varney
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Student Engagement ◽  
Graduate Students ◽  
Student Success ◽  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
First Generation ◽  
Graduate Programs ◽  
Relationship Building ◽  
Critical Component ◽  
Student Advisor

The goal of this chapter is to discuss the importance of advisor-student engagement as a critical component of student success. Much has been written about advising undergraduate students and strategies for working with first generation students and other challenges specific to undergraduate students, and this chapter will focus on working with online graduate students. Heisserer and Parette noted that contact with a significant person within an institution of higher education is a crucial factor in a student's decision to remain in college. The focus on this chapter is on how advisors can be the significant person within the institution for their graduate students, and how advisors can help students successfully integrate into the institution academically and socially to increase their likelihood of retention and success.

scholarly journals The Code-Centric Nature of Computational Thinking Education: A Review of Trends and Issues in Computational Thinking Education Research

SAGE Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 215824402110164
Author(s):  
Vance Kite ◽  
Soonhye Park ◽  
Eric Wiebe
Keyword(s):  
Education Research ◽  
Student Success ◽  
Computational Thinking ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Critical Component ◽  
Future Directions ◽  
Content Integration ◽  
Core Curricula ◽  
Digital Era ◽  
Professional Development For Teachers

Computational thinking (CT) is being recognized as a critical component of student success in the digital era. Many contend that integrating CT into core curricula is the surest method for providing all students with access to CT. However, the CT community lacks an agreed-upon conceptualization of CT that would facilitate this integration, and little effort has been made to critically analyze and synthesize research on CT/content integration (CTCI). Conflicting CT conceptualizations and little understanding of evidence-based strategies for CTCI could result in significant barriers to increasing students’ access to CT. To address these concerns, we analyzed 80 studies on CT education, focusing on both the CT conceptualizations guiding current CT education research and evidence-based strategies for CTCI. Our review highlights the code-centric nature of CT education and reveals significant gaps in our understanding of CTCI and CT professional development for teachers. Based on these findings, we propose an approach to operationalizing CT that promotes students’ participation in CT, present promising methods for infusing content with CT, and discuss future directions for CT education research.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document