Stochastic comparison on load‐sharing systems with one statistically dependent redundancy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen Li ◽  
Rui Fang ◽  
Xiaohu Li
Keyword(s):  
Load Sharing ◽  
Stochastic Comparison

A STUDY OF THE LOAD SHARING OF KNEE LIGAMENTS

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juliana Emery Silva ◽  
Brenno Tavares Duarte ◽  
Rodrigo Ribeiro Pinho Rodarte ◽  
Paulo Pedro Kenedi
Keyword(s):  
Load Sharing ◽  
Knee Ligaments

Load-Sharing Reliability Models with Different Component Sensitivities to Other Components’ Working States

2021 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-132
Author(s):  
Tomasz Rychlik ◽  
Fabio Spizzichino
Keyword(s):  
Order Statistics ◽  
Load Sharing ◽  
Single Component ◽  
Generalized Order Statistics ◽  
Hazard Rates ◽  
System Operation ◽  
Reliability Models ◽  
Mixtures Of Distributions ◽  
Failure Times ◽  
Generalized Order

AbstractWe study the distributions of component and system lifetimes under the time-homogeneous load-sharing model, where the multivariate conditional hazard rates of working components depend only on the set of failed components, and not on their failure moments or the time elapsed from the start of system operation. Then we analyze its time-heterogeneous extension, in which the distributions of consecutive failure times, single component lifetimes, and system lifetimes coincide with mixtures of distributions of generalized order statistics. Finally we focus on some specific forms of the time-nonhomogeneous load-sharing model.

Reliability analysis and state transfer scheduling optimization of degrading load-sharing system equipped with warm standby components

2021 ◽  
pp. 1748006X2110017
Author(s):  
Sheng-Jia Ruan ◽  
Yan-Hui Lin
Keyword(s):  
Reliability Analysis ◽  
System Reliability ◽  
High Reliability ◽  
Quadrature Rule ◽  
Load Sharing ◽  
Measurement Information ◽  
Model Parameters ◽  
Scheduling Optimization ◽  
State Transfer ◽  
Warm Standby

Standby redundancy can meet system safety requirements in industries with high reliability standards. To evaluate reliability of standby systems, failure dependency among components has to be considered especially when systems have load-sharing characteristics. In this paper, a reliability analysis and state transfer scheduling optimization framework is proposed for the load-sharing 1-out-of- N: G system equipped with M warm standby components and subject to continuous degradation process. First, the system reliability function considering multiple dependent components is derived in a recursive way. Then, a Monte Carlo method is developed and the closed Newton-Cotes quadrature rule is invoked for the system reliability quantification. Besides, likelihood functions are constructed based on the measurement information to estimate the model parameters of both active and standby components, whose degradation paths are modeled by the step-wise drifted Wiener processes. Finally, the system state transfer scheduling is optimized by the genetic algorithm to maximize the system reliability at mission time. The proposed methodology and its effectiveness are illustrated through a case study referring to a simplified aircraft hydraulic system.

Stochastic comparison of parallel systems with Pareto components

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Sameen Naqvi ◽  
Weiyong Ding ◽  
Peng Zhao
Keyword(s):  
Order Statistics ◽  
Extreme Value Theory ◽  
Pareto Distribution ◽  
Parallel Systems ◽  
Value Theory ◽  
Extreme Value ◽  
Stochastic Comparison ◽  
Shape Parameters ◽  
Scale Parameters ◽  
Dispersive Ordering

Abstract Pareto distribution is an important distribution in extreme value theory. In this paper, we consider parallel systems with Pareto components and study the effect of heterogeneity on skewness of such systems. It is shown that, when the lifetimes of components have different shape parameters, the parallel system with heterogeneous Pareto component lifetimes is more skewed than the system with independent and identically distributed Pareto components. However, for the case when the lifetimes of components have different scale parameters, the result gets reversed in the sense of star ordering. We also establish the relation between star ordering and dispersive ordering by extending the result of Deshpande and Kochar [(1983). Dispersive ordering is the same as tail ordering. Advances in Applied Probability 15(3): 686–687] from support $(0, \infty )$ to general supports $(a, \infty )$ , $a > 0$ . As a consequence, we obtain some new results on dispersion of order statistics from heterogeneous Pareto samples with respect to dispersive ordering.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document