Text representation strategies: An example with the State of the union addresses

2015 ◽  
Vol 67 (8) ◽  
pp. 1858-1870 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacques Savoy
Keyword(s):  
The State ◽  
Text Representation ◽  
State Of The Union

Psychoneuroimmunology: The State of the Union

1992 ◽  
Vol 37 (9) ◽  
pp. 925-926
Author(s):  
Douglas R. Denney
Keyword(s):  
The State ◽  
State Of The Union

The Real America: A Surprising Examination of the State of the Union.

1975 ◽  
Vol 90 (2) ◽  
pp. 325
Author(s):  
James L. Sundquist ◽  
Ben J. Wattenberg ◽  
Richard M. Scammon
Keyword(s):  
The State ◽  
The Real ◽  
State Of The Union

scholarly journals Axiological Vectors in the American and Russian Presidental Discourse: The State of the Union Address and the Address to the Russian Federal Assembly Compared

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (2(2)) ◽  
pp. 121-150
Author(s):  
Ruslan Saduov
Keyword(s):  
The State ◽  
The Political ◽  
Political Leaders ◽  
Cultural Economic ◽  
State Of The Union ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Presidential Discourse ◽  
The Given

Presidential discourse is an indicative of axiological and other developmental vectors of a linguocultural community. It informs one about the main social, cultural, economic, and political changes in a country. In this respect, the annual State of the Union Address in the USA and the Address to the Federal Assembly in Russia are seen as the highlights of the political calendar in both countries, as these statements summarise the most relevant issues and enable their respective leaders to elaborate on their vision of their nation’s future. This paper aims to analise and compare the axiological vectors developed in the given presidential addresses in both Russia and the USA in the period from 2009 to 2015. It traces not only the most relevant values promoted by the political leaders, but also any axiological changes that occurred in the eventful years under investigation. The results of the research inform one about the current axiological identities of the linguocultural communities in question and the changing vectors of their development.

scholarly journals Analysis of Political Metaphors in Donald J. Trump’s State of the Union Address in 2020

2021 ◽  
pp. 69-73
Author(s):  
Tang Bingyu
Keyword(s):  
Conceptual Metaphor ◽  
The State ◽  
The Political ◽  
Cognitive Analysis ◽  
Conceptual Metaphor Theory ◽  
State Of The Union ◽  
Metaphor Theory ◽  
George Lakoff ◽  
The Masses ◽  
The Relationship

On the basis of Conceptual Metaphor Theory proposed by George Lakoff and Mark Johnson, this paper conducts a cognitive analysis of conceptual metaphors in Donald J. Trump’s State of the Union Address in 2020, aiming to explain the metaphors in the State of the Union Address, reveal the political intentions hidden behind the metaphors, and construe the relationship between politics and metaphor. It is found that the metaphors in this State of the Union Address are: CONFLICT metaphors, BUILDING metaphor, JOURNEY metaphors, ORIENTATIONAL metaphors, and PLANT metaphors. Through the analysis, this paper concludes that conceptual metaphor has the function of persuading the masses and shaping the image of politicians. At the same time, this paper also finds that politics restricts the choice and application of metaphor.

Reframing Audience

2014 ◽  
pp. 148-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. R. Boynton ◽  
Glenn W. Richardson Jr.
Keyword(s):  
Political Discourse ◽  
Public Domain ◽  
Black Box ◽  
The State ◽  
Evaluative Judgment ◽  
Critical Importance ◽  
The Public ◽  
State Of The Union

Analysis of the audiences for the state of the union addresses on Twitter from 2010-2012 provides analytical leverage in unpacking the concept of audience, which has largely inhabited an analytical “black box,” seen as of critical importance but little understood. The authors frame audience as “co-motion” as it evolves from a broadcast medium to a medium of interaction in three moves: hashtags that establish a space for gathering, retweets that share reading, and sharing of urls that serve to communicate importance, evaluative judgment, and justification. They contrast the response of the congressional audience and the Twitter audience and find, while there was substantial overlap in their applause, members of Congress were less responsive than the Twitter audience to the president's calls for them to meet their responsibilities and less responsive to criticisms of major corporations. The authors find a vibrant political discourse on Twitter reaching a potential audience that rivals in size that of television, as audience becomes the public domain.

The State of the Union and Province of Biology

BioScience ◽  
1972 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 104-104
Author(s):  
Robert W. Krauss
Keyword(s):  
The State ◽  
State Of The Union
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document