scholarly journals How comprehensive are research studies investigating the efficacy of technology-enhanced learning resources in anatomy education? A systematic review

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 303-319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren Clunie ◽  
Neil P. Morris ◽  
Viktoria C.T. Joynes ◽  
James D. Pickering
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Technology Enhanced Learning ◽  
Learning Resources ◽  
Anatomy Education ◽  
Enhanced Learning ◽  
Research Studies

scholarly journals Monitoring, awareness and reflection in blended technology enhanced learning: a systematic review

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (2/3) ◽  
pp. 126 ◽  
Author(s):  
María Jesús Rodríguez Triana ◽  
Luis P. Prieto ◽  
Andrii Vozniuk ◽  
Mina Shirvani Boroujeni ◽  
Beat A. Schwendimann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Technology Enhanced Learning ◽  
Enhanced Learning

scholarly journals Effectiveness of technology-enhanced learning in Endodontic education: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Nagendrababu ◽  
S. J. Pulikkotil ◽  
O. S. Sultan ◽  
J. Jayaraman ◽  
J. A. Soh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Technology Enhanced Learning ◽  
Enhanced Learning

Technology-Enhanced Learning in the Corporate Context

2011 ◽  
pp. 306-323
Author(s):  
Anoush Margaryan ◽  
Betty Collis
Keyword(s):  
Informal Learning ◽  
Opportunity To Learn ◽  
Technology Enhanced Learning ◽  
Learning Resources ◽  
Learning Context ◽  
Corporate Learning ◽  
Corporate Context ◽  
Formal And Informal Learning ◽  
Key Issues ◽  
Enhanced Learning

This paper focuses on tools and strategies to integrate the strengths of formal and informal learning in the corporate context via the use of work-based activities within courses. The following proposition is argued: An effective course in the corporate context becomes a blend of formal and informal learning, a guided opportunity to learn from and share experiences gained through work-based activities, and to contribute one’s own experiences as learning resources for others, for use in both formal and informal learning settings. Examples from practice in a multinational corporate learning context where a number of courses have been redesigned to allow integration of formal and informal learning are given. Key issues and challenges arising from this experience are discussed.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of technology‐enhanced learning to improve periodontics educational outcomes: A systematic review

2020 ◽  
Vol 84 (7) ◽  
pp. 830-839
Author(s):  
Maria C. de C. Berry ◽  
Joao M. M. Neto ◽  
Maria Isabel de C. Souza ◽  
Carlos Marcelo da S. Figueredo ◽  
Vanessa Reher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Educational Outcomes ◽  
Technology Enhanced Learning ◽  
Enhanced Learning

scholarly journals Evaluation of Technology-Enhanced Learning Programs for Health Care Professionals: Systematic Review (Preprint)

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pam Nicoll ◽  
Sandra MacRury ◽  
Hugo C van Woerden ◽  
Keith Smyth
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Learner Satisfaction ◽  
Average Score ◽  
Technology Enhanced Learning ◽  
Current Evidence Base ◽  
Enhanced Learning ◽  
Satisfaction Surveys

BACKGROUND Technology-enhanced learning (TEL) programs are increasingly seen as the way in which education for health care professionals can be transformed, giving access to effective ongoing learning and training even where time or geographical barriers exist. Given the increasing emphasis on this mode of educational support for health care practitioners, it is vital that we can effectively evaluate and measure impact to ensure that TEL programs are effective and fit for purpose. This paper examines the current evidence base for the first time, in relation to the evaluation of TEL programs for health care professionals. OBJECTIVE We conducted a systematic review of the current literature relating to the evaluation of TEL programs for health care professionals and critically appraised the quality of the studies. METHODS This review employed specific search criteria to identify research studies that included evaluation of TEL for health care professionals. The databases searched included Medline Ovid, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature Plus Advanced, Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts, ZETOC, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Explore Digital Library, Allied and Complementary Medicine, and Education Resources Information Center between January 2006 and January 2017. An additional hand search for relevant articles from reference lists was undertaken. Each of the studies identified was critically appraised for quality using the Crowe Critical Appraisal Tool. This approach produced a percentage total score for each study across specified categories. A proportion of the studies were independently assessed by an additional two reviewers. RESULTS The review identified 21 studies that met the inclusion criteria. The studies included scored totals across eight categories within a range of 37%-95% and an average score of 68%. Studies that measured TEL using learner satisfaction surveys, or combined pretest and posttest knowledge score testing with learner satisfaction surveys, were found to be the most common types of TEL evaluations evident in the literature. The studies reviewed had low scores across reporting on ethical matters, design, and data collection categories. CONCLUSIONS There continues to be a need to develop effective and standard TEL evaluation tools, and good quality studies that describe effective evaluation of TEL education for health care professionals. Studies often fail to provide sufficient detail to support transferability or direct future TEL health care education programs.

scholarly journals Monitoring, awareness and reflection in blended technology enhanced learning: a systematic review

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (2/3) ◽  
pp. 126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denis Gillet ◽  
Adrian Holzer ◽  
Beat A. Schwendimann ◽  
Mina Shirvani Boroujeni ◽  
Andrii Vozniuk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Technology Enhanced Learning ◽  
Enhanced Learning
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document