Dual‐Energy Computed Tomography for the Noninvasive Diagnosis of Coexisting Gout and Calcium Pyrophosphate Deposition Disease

2019 ◽  
Vol 71 (8) ◽  
pp. 1392-1392 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rami Hajri ◽  
Steven D. Hajdu ◽  
Thomas Hügle ◽  
Pascal Zufferey ◽  
Laurent Guiral ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Calcium Pyrophosphate ◽  
Dual Energy ◽  
Noninvasive Diagnosis ◽  
Dual Energy Computed Tomography ◽  
Calcium Pyrophosphate Deposition Disease ◽  
Deposition Disease

scholarly journals OP0318 THE ROLE OF DUAL ENERGY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY (DECT) IN THE DIFFERENTIATION OF GOUT AND CALCIUM PYROPHOSPHATE DEPOSITION DISEASE

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 196.2-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Kravchenko ◽  
P. Karakostas ◽  
P. Brossart ◽  
C. Behning ◽  
C. Meyer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Uric Acid ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Gold Standard ◽  
Calcium Pyrophosphate ◽  
Dual Energy ◽  
Laboratory Parameters ◽  
Dual Energy Computed Tomography ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Calcium Pyrophosphate Deposition Disease

Background:Differentiation of gout and calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease (CPPD) is sometimes difficult as patients often present with a similar clinical picture. Arthrocentesis and subsequent polarization microscopy (PM) remains the gold standard but novel diagnostic approaches such as non-invasive dual energy computed tomography (DECT) have recently been validated for gout. Currently, limited data is available on DECT in patients with CPPD.Objectives:To analyse the diagnostic impact of DECT in gout and CPPD when compared to the gold standard of PM. We further compared the results of PM to ultrasound (US), conventional radiographs (CR), and suspected clinical diagnosis (SCD). Additionally, 15 laboratory parameters were analysed.Methods:Twenty-six patients diagnosed with gout (n = 18) or CPPD (n = 8) who received a DECT and underwent arthrocentesis were included. Two independent readers assessed colour coded, as well as 80 and 120 kV DECT images for signs of monosodium urate (MSU) crystals or CPP deposition. US and CR from the patient’s initial visit along with the SCD were also compared to PM. US examinations were performed by certified musculoskeletal ultrasound specialists. The association of up to 15 laboratory parameters such as uric acid, thyroid stimulating hormone, and C-reactive protein (CRP) with the PM results was analysed.Results:Sensitivity of DECT for gout was 67% (95% CI 0.41-0.87) with a specificity of 88% (95% CI 0.47-1.0). Concerning CPPD, the sensitivity and specificity of DECT was 63% (95% CI 0.25-0.91) and 83% (95% CI 0.59-0.96) respectively. US had the highest sensitivity of 89% (95% CI 0.65-0.99) with a specificity of 75% (95% CI 0.35-0.97) for gout, while the sensitivity and specificity for CPPD were 88% (95% CI 0.47-1.0) and 89% (95% CI 0.65-0.99) respectively. The SCD had the second highest sensitivity for gout at 78% (95% CI 0.52-0.94) with a comparable sensitivity of 63% (95% CI 0.25-0.92) for CPPD. Uric acid levels were elevated in 33% of gout patients and 25% of CPPD patients. While elevated CRP levels were observed in 59% of gout patients and in 88% of CPPD patients, none of the 15 analysed laboratory parameters were found to be significantly linked.Conclusion:DECT provides a non-invasive diagnostic tool for gout but might have a lower sensitivity than suggested by previous studies (67% vs 90%1). DECT sensitivity for CPPD was 63% (95% CI 0.25-0.91) in a sample group of eight patients. Both US and the SCD had higher sensitivities than DECT for gout and CPPD. Further studies with larger patient cohorts are needed in order to determine the diagnostic utility of DECT in CPPD.References:[1]Bongartz, Tim; Glazebrook, Katrina N.; Kavros, Steven J.; Murthy, Naveen S.; Merry, Stephen P.; Franz, Walter B. et al. (2015): Dual-energy CT for the diagnosis of gout: an accuracy and diagnostic yield study. InAnnals of the rheumatic diseases74 (6), pp. 1072–1077. DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-205095.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

scholarly journals SAT0554 SONOGRAPHIC ASSESSMENT OF CALCIUM PYROPHOSPHATE DEPOSITION DISEASE AT WRIST. A FOCUS ON THE SCAPHO-LUNATE LIGAMENT.

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1234.2-1235
Author(s):  
E. Cipolletta ◽  
G. Smerilli ◽  
R. Mashadi Mirza ◽  
A. DI Matteo ◽  
F. Salaffi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Imaging Techniques ◽  
Calcium Pyrophosphate ◽  
Scaphoid Bone ◽  
Lunate Bone ◽  
Calcium Pyrophosphate Deposition Disease ◽  
Dorsal Aspect ◽  
Deposition Disease ◽  
Extensor Compartment

Background:Only few articles evaluated the wrist in calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease (CPPD), although it is the second most frequent target of CPPD. Very recently, in a computed tomography (CT) study ligamentous calcifications were reported as a highly specific feature of CPPD at wrist level (1).Objectives:i) to determine the prevalence and distribution of the ultrasound (US) findings indicative of calcium pyrophosphate (CPP) crystal deposits at the wrist, with a particular focus on the dorsal aspect of the scapho-lunate ligament (SLL); ii) to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of US and conventional radiography (CR) in the evaluation of CPP crystal deposits at wrist level, iv) to assess the agreement between the different imaging techniques.Methods:Consecutive patients with a “definite” diagnosis of CPPD according to the Ryan and McCarty criteria and disease controls were prospectively included in this cross-sectional single-centre study. Dorsal part of the SLL, triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC), and volar recess of the radio-lunate joint were explored using US (according to EULAR standard scans and OMERACT definitions), CR and CT.Results:Sixty-one CPPD patients and 39 disease controls were enrolled. Two-hundred wrists were evaluated using both CR and US. CT data of 26 (13.0%) wrists were available: 20 wrists in CPPD patients and 6 wrists in controls. CPP crystal deposits were found by US in at least one wrist in 95.1% of CPPD patients and in 15.4% of controls (p<0.001). SLL calcification was reported in 83.6% of CPPD patients and in 5.1% of controls (p<0.001). CPP crystal deposits were observed by US at the SLL and/or radio-lunate joint in 5.7% of wrists and 6.6% of CPPD patients, but not at the TFCC of the same wrist. On CR, calcifications were found in at least one wrist in 72.1% of CPPD patients and in 0% of controls (p<0.001). Using the Ryan-McCarty criteria as a gold standard, the sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy were 0.72 (0.59-0.83), 1.0 (0.91-1.0) and 0.83 (0.74-0.90) for CR and 0.95 (0.86-0.99), 0.85 (0.69-0.94) and 0.91 (0.84-0.96) for US. Table 1 shows the agreement between the different imaging techniques.Tabel 1.Agreement between US and the other imaging techniques in the evaluation of CPP crystal deposits at the wrist.US-CR (n=200)US-CT (n=26)TFCC0.55 (0.43-0.67)0.70 (0.43-0.97)SLL0.23 (0.07-0.39)0.69 (0.41-0.97)RLJ0.25 (0.09-0.41)0.46 (0.12-0.80)Legend.n: number of the wrists,RLJ: volar recess of the radio-lunate joint. Values in brackets are the 95% confidence intervals of the Cohen’s kappa.Figure 1provides a pictorial evidence of the appearance of CPP crystal deposits in the SLL.A: CPP crystal deposits (curved arrow) at the TFCC. The SLL is not assessable due to superimposition of other bones.B: in the same patient of figure 1A, CT scan shows the presence of a calcification of the dorsal aspect of the SLL (arrow).C: dorsal longitudinal scan of the SLL: isolated hyperechoic spot (arrowheads) inside the ligament.D: dorsal longitudinal scan of the SLL showing the presence of a large aggregate extending towards the extensor tendons and hyperechoic spots (arrowheads) within it.Legend.iii: third extensor compartment,iv: fourth extensor compartment,l: lunate bone,s:scaphoid bone.Conclusion:This study supports the diagnostic accuracy of US in evaluating wrist involvement in CPPD patients. SLL calcifications are a specific US finding of CPPD at wrist level.References:[1]Ziegeler K, Diekhoff T, Hermann S, et al. Low-dose computed tomography as diagnostic tool in calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease arthropathy: focus on ligamentous calcifications of the wrist. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2019;37:826-33.Disclosure of Interests:Edoardo Cipolletta: None declared, Gianluca Smerilli: None declared, Riccardo Mashadi Mirza: None declared, Andrea Di Matteo Grant/research support from: the publication was conducted while Dr. Di Matteo was an ARTICULUM fellow, Fausto Salaffi Speakers bureau: Dr. Salaffi reports personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from AbbVie, personal fees from Roche, personal fees from Merck Sharp & Dohme Italia, outside the submitted work., Walter Grassi Speakers bureau: Prof. Grassi reports personal fees from AbbVie, personal fees from Celgene, personal fees from Grünenthal, personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from Union Chimique Belge Pharma, outside the submitted work., Emilio Filippucci Speakers bureau: Dr. Filippucci reports personal fees from AbbVie, personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, personal fees from Celgene, personal fees from Roche, personal fees from Union Chimique Belge Pharma, personal fees from Pfizer, outside the submitted work.

Dual-Energy Computed Tomography for Detection and Characterization of Monosodium Urate, Calcium Pyrophosphate, and Hydroxyapatite

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Døssing ◽  
Felix Christoph Müller ◽  
Fabio Becce ◽  
Lisa Stamp ◽  
Henning Bliddal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Calcium Pyrophosphate ◽  
Dual Energy ◽  
Monosodium Urate ◽  
Dual Energy Computed Tomography

scholarly journals The role of dual energy computed tomography in the differentiation of acute gout flares and acute calcium pyrophosphate crystal arthritis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dmitrij Kravchenko ◽  
Pantelis Karakostas ◽  
Daniel Kuetting ◽  
Carsten Meyer ◽  
Peter Brossart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Calcium Pyrophosphate ◽  
Dual Energy ◽  
Lower Sensitivity ◽  
Acute Gout ◽  
Dual Energy Computed Tomography ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Crystal Arthritis ◽  
Gout Flares

Abstract Objectives To analyse the diagnostic impact of dual energy computed tomography (DECT) in acute gout flares and acute calcium pyrophosphate (CPP) crystal arthritis when compared to the gold standard of arthrocentesis with compensated polarised light microscopy. Microscopy results were also compared to musculoskeletal ultrasound (MUS), conventional radiographs, and the suspected clinical diagnosis (SCD). Methods Thirty-six patients with a suspected gout flare (n = 24) or acute CPP crystal arthritis (n = 11, n = 1 suffered from neither) who received a DECT and underwent arthrocentesis were included. Two independent readers assessed DECT images for signs of monosodium urate crystals or calcium pyrophosphate deposition. Results Sensitivity of DECT for gout was 63% (95% CI 0.41–0.81) with a specificity of 92% (0.41–0.81) while sensitivity and specificity for acute CPP arthritis were 55% (0.23–0.83) and 92% (0.74–0.99), respectively. MUS had the highest sensitivity of all imaging modalities with 92% (0.73–0.99) and a specificity of 83% (0.52–0.98) for gout, while sensitivity and specificity for acute CPP crystal arthritis were 91% (0.59–1.00) and 92% (0.74–0.99), respectively. Conclusion DECT is an adequate non-invasive diagnostic tool for acute gout flares but might have a lower sensitivity than described by previous studies. Both MUS and SCD had higher sensitivities than DECT for acute gout flares and acute CPP crystal arthritis. Key Points• DECT offers a lower sensitivity for acute gout flares than previously described.• DECT sensitivity for acute CPP crystal arthritis is less than the already validated ultrasound.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document