scholarly journals Prediction of adverse pregnancy outcome by the presence of lupus anticoagulant, but not anticardiolipin antibody, in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies

2012 ◽  
Vol 64 (7) ◽  
pp. 2311-2318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael D. Lockshin ◽  
Mimi Kim ◽  
Carl A. Laskin ◽  
Marta Guerra ◽  
D. Ware Branch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pregnancy Outcome ◽  
Antiphospholipid Antibodies ◽  
Lupus Anticoagulant ◽  
Adverse Pregnancy Outcome ◽  
Anticardiolipin Antibody ◽  
Adverse Pregnancy

scholarly journals POS0737 LOW PRECONCEPTIONAL COMPLEMENT LEVEL IS RELATED WITH ADVERSE OBSTETRIC OUTCOME IN A MULTICENTRIC COHORT OF PREGNANCY IN PATIENTS WITH APS AND APL POSITIVITY

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 619.2-620
Author(s):  
D. Lini ◽  
C. Nalli ◽  
L. Andreoli ◽  
F. Crisafulli ◽  
M. Fredi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pregnancy Outcome ◽  
Complement Activation ◽  
Pregnancy Complications ◽  
Antiphospholipid Antibodies ◽  
Pregnancy Loss ◽  
Adverse Pregnancy Outcome ◽  
Obstetric Outcome ◽  
Complement Level ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Adverse Pregnancy

Background:The role of complement in the antiphospholipid (aPL) related pathology has been widely studied in animal models. Antiphospholipid antibodies can induce fetal loss in experimental animals but mice deficient in specific complement components (C4, C3, C5) appear somehow protected. In addition, in pregnant mice injected with aPL, antibody deposition has been found at decidual level causing focal necrosis, apoptosis and neutrophil infiltrates and supporting aPL pathogenetic potential. On the other hand, human studies did find hypocomplementemia associated to pregnancy complications in patients with obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). These results, however, are not unanimously confirmed and, in addition, some studies only show increased levels of complement activation products (i.e. Bb) and not decreased levels of C3 and/or C4. A recently study focusing on complement level in early pregnancy and before pregnancy showed a significant correlation with pregnancy complications and loss in a large cohort of primary APS.Objectives:To investigate if the simple detection of low C3 and/or C4 could be considered a risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcome in APS and aPL carriers pregnancies.Methods:We performed a multicentric study including patients from 10 Italian and 1 Russian Centers. Data on pregnancies in women with primary APS (n=434) and asymptomatic carriers with persistently positive aPL but not fulfilling clinical criteria for APS (n=218) were retrospectively collected. Serum C3 and C4 levels were evaluated by nephelometry; hypocomplementemia was defined by local laboratory reference values. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad.Results:Preconceptional complement levels and gestational outcome were available for 107 (25%) pregnancies in APS out of 434 and for 196 (90%) pregnancies in aPL carriers women out of 218. In pregnancies with low preconceptional C3 and/or C4, a significantly higher prevalence of pregnancy losses was observed (p=0.019). A subgroup analysis focusing on triple aPL positive patients was also performed. Preconceptional low C3 and/or C4 levels were found to be associated with an increased rate of pregnancy loss (p = 0.027) in this subgroup also. Otherwise, adverse pregnancy outcomes in single or double aPL positive women were not related to preconception complement levels (p = 0.44) (Table 1). Of note, all the pregnancy losses in the triple positive group occurred in patients treated with low dose aspirin and low molecular weight heparin from the time of positive pregnancy test.Conclusion:Our findings confirm that decreased complement levels before pregnancy are associated with increased risk of adverse outcome. This has been seen only in in women with triple aPL positivity, indeed single or double positivity does not show this trend. Complement levels are cheap and easy to be measured therefore they could represent a useful aid to identify patients at increased risk of pregnancy loss. test positivity.References:[1]De Carolis S, et al. Complementemia and obstetric outcome in pregnancy with antiphospholipid syndrome. Lupus (2012) 21:776–8.[2]Kim MY, et al. Complement activation predicts adverse pregnancy outcome in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and/or antiphospholipid antibodies. Ann Rheum Dis (2018) 77:549–55.[3]Fredi M, et al. Risk Factors for Adverse Maternal and Fetal Outcomes in Women With Confirmed aPL Positivity: Results From a Multicenter Study of 283 Pregnancies. Front Immunol. 2018 May 7;9:864.Triple aPL positivitySingle or double aPL positivityGestational outcomeLow C3/C4 (n=49)Normal C3/C4(n=17)pLow C3/C4 (n=57)Normal C3/C4(n=165)pTerm live birth (>37w)15 (31%)6 (35%)ns34 (60%)110 (67%)nsPreterm live birth (≤37w)22 (45%)11 (65%)ns15 (26%)38 (23%)nsPregnancy losses (abortion and miscarriages)12 (24%)0 (0%)0.0278 (14%) 17 (10%)nsDisclosure of Interests:None declared

scholarly journals 748: Antiphospholipid antibodies characteristics and adverse pregnancy outcome

2017 ◽  
Vol 216 (1) ◽  
pp. S434-S435
Author(s):  
Eran Hadar ◽  
Hadas Zafrir-Danieli ◽  
Dorit Blickstein ◽  
Rony Chen ◽  
Arnon Wiznitzer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pregnancy Outcome ◽  
Antiphospholipid Antibodies ◽  
Adverse Pregnancy Outcome ◽  
Adverse Pregnancy

Recurrent adverse pregnancy outcome and antiphospholipid antibodies

1990 ◽  
Vol 163 (1) ◽  
pp. 162-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Albert Reece ◽  
Sandro Gabrielli ◽  
Mark T. Cullen ◽  
Xue-Zheng Zheng ◽  
John C. Hobbins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pregnancy Outcome ◽  
Antiphospholipid Antibodies ◽  
Adverse Pregnancy Outcome ◽  
Adverse Pregnancy

The impact of various entities of antiphospholipid antibodies positivity on adverse pregnancy outcome. An epidemiological perspective

2021 ◽  
Vol 145 ◽  
pp. 103304
Author(s):  
Arsenio Spinillo ◽  
Camilla Bellingeri ◽  
Irene De Maggio ◽  
Greta Riceputi ◽  
Maria Paola Pandolfi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pregnancy Outcome ◽  
Antiphospholipid Antibodies ◽  
Adverse Pregnancy Outcome ◽  
Adverse Pregnancy ◽  
The Impact
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document