scholarly journals Morphologic and quantitative assessment of CD20+ B cell infiltrates in rheumatoid arthritis–associated nonspecific interstitial pneumonia and usual interstitial pneumonia

2006 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 635-641 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah R. Atkins ◽  
Carl Turesson ◽  
Jeffery L. Myers ◽  
Henry D. Tazelaar ◽  
Jay H. Ryu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Quantitative Assessment ◽  
Usual Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Nonspecific Interstitial Pneumonia

scholarly journals Pathologic Quantification of Connective Tissue Disease–Associated Versus Idiopathic Usual Interstitial Pneumonia

2012 ◽  
Vol 136 (10) ◽  
pp. 1253-1258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole A. Cipriani ◽  
Mary Strek ◽  
Imre Noth ◽  
Ilyssa O. Gordon ◽  
Jeff Charbeneau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Connective Tissue ◽  
Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Connective Tissue Disease ◽  
Interstitial Pneumonitis ◽  
Interobserver Variability ◽  
Usual Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Nonspecific Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Salient Features ◽  
Lymphoid Aggregates

Context.—Usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) is a common chronic interstitial pneumonitis. It can occur idiopathically (I-UIP) or in the setting of systemic connective tissue disease (CTD-UIP). Some studies suggest that CTD-UIP has a better prognosis than I-UIP. The histologic differences between CTD-UIP and I-UIP are not clearly defined. Objective.—The purpose of this study was to evaluate histologic criteria that may differentiate CTD-UIP from I-UIP, including fibroblastic foci (FFs), lymphoid aggregates (LAs), and the presence of nonspecific interstitial pneumonia pattern. Design.—Thirty-five patients with histologic diagnoses of UIP were identified (27 biopsies [77%]; 8 explants [23%]). Biopsy slides were scanned and analyzed quantitatively for FF size, FF area, LA size, and LA area. Biopsy and explant slides were examined qualitatively for the presence of a nonspecific interstitial pneumonia pattern in areas away from UIP fibrosis. Results.—Of 27 biopsies, the number and size of FFs in CTD-UIP were smaller than they were in I-UIP. The number and size of LAs were larger in patients with rheumatoid arthritis than they were in patients with I-UIP. There was no interobserver variability among 3 pathologists using this quantitative system. Of 35 biopsies and explants, there was a higher prevalence of the nonspecific interstitial pneumonia pattern among patients with CTD-UIP than there was among patients with I-UIP (P = .005). Conclusions.—Patients with CTD-UIP had fewer, smaller FFs than did patients with I-UIP, and patients with rheumatoid arthritis-UIP had more, larger LAs than did patients with I-UIP. Of importance, the coexistence of UIP and the nonspecific interstitial pneumonia patterns was one of the most salient features in distinguishing CTD-UIP from I-UIP because CTD-UIP demonstrated an increased prevalence of multilobar, cellular, nonspecific interstitial pneumonia patterns in areas away from the UIP fibrosis.

scholarly journals The Multifaceted Aspects of Interstitial Lung Disease in Rheumatoid Arthritis

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorenzo Cavagna ◽  
Sara Monti ◽  
Vittorio Grosso ◽  
Nicola Boffini ◽  
Eva Scorletti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Interstitial Lung Disease ◽  
Lung Disease ◽  
Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Usual Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Disease Process ◽  
Tnf Alpha ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Nonspecific Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Citrullinated Peptide

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a relevant extra-articular manifestation of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) that may occur either in early stages or as a complication of long-standing disease. RA related ILD (RA-ILD) significantly influences thequoad vitamprognosis of these patients. Several histopathological patterns of RA-ILD have been described: usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) is the most frequent one, followed by nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP); other patterns are less commonly observed. Several factors have been associated with an increased risk of developing RA-ILD. The genetic background plays a fundamental but not sufficient role; smoking is an independent predictor of ILD, and a correlation with the presence of rheumatoid factor and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies has also been reported. Moreover, bothexnovooccurrence and progression of ILD have been related to drug therapies that are commonly prescribed in RA, such as methotrexate, leflunomide, anti-TNF alpha agents, and rituximab. A greater understanding of the disease process is necessary in order to improve the therapeutic approach to ILD and RA itself and to reduce the burden of this severe extra-articular manifestation.

scholarly journals Ultrasound in Rheumatologic Interstitial Lung Disease: A Case Report of Nonspecific Interstitial Pneumonia in Rheumatoid Arthritis

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
A. Laria ◽  
A. Lurati ◽  
M. Scarpellini
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Interstitial Fibrosis ◽  
Usual Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
European Respiratory Society ◽  
Cryptogenic Organizing Pneumonia ◽  
Acute Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Pulmonary Interstitial Fibrosis ◽  
Nonspecific Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Consensus Classification

According to the American Thoracic Society (ATS)/European Respiratory Society consensus classification, idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIPs) include several clinic-radiologic-pathologic entities: idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP), nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP), cryptogenic organizing pneumonia, acute interstitial pneumonia, respiratory bronchiolitis-associated ILD, desquamative interstitial pneumonia, and lymphoid interstitial pneumonia. Ultrasound Lung Comets (ULCs) are an echographic chest-sonography hallmark of pulmonary interstitial fibrosis. We describe the ultrasound (US) findings in the follow-up of a NSIP’s case in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

scholarly journals POS1435 CLINICAL CHARACTERIZATION AND PREDICTIVE FACTORS FOR PROGRESSION IN A COHORT OF ILD PATIENTS WITH FEATURES OF AUTOIMMUNITY: ARE IPAF CRITERIA SUFFICIENT?

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1002.1-1002
Author(s):  
F. Bozzao ◽  
P. Tomietto ◽  
E. Baratella ◽  
F. Giudici ◽  
M. Kodric ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Predictive Factors ◽  
Usual Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Final Diagnosis ◽  
Classification Criteria ◽  
Radiological Progression ◽  
Nonspecific Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Functional Deterioration ◽  
Worse Prognosis

Background:It is unknown whether patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) and only some features of autoimmunity have a different natural history from those with a defined connective tissue disease (CTD-ILD). The classification criteria for “ILD with autoimmune features” (IPAF) may not be able to characterize all these patients, especially those with a usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern [1].Objectives:To determine clinical characteristics and predictive factors for progression in a cohort of ILD patients with features of autoimmunity, through the application of classification criteria for IPAF and specific CTD, whenever possible.Methods:We retrospectively selected a cohort of consecutive patients with ILD as onset manifestation and features of autoimmunity (at least 1 autoantibody and/or 1 clinical sign/symptom), evaluated by our multidisciplinary unit from March 2009 to March 2020. All the final diagnoses were revised according to the latest CTD and IPAF criteria. Patients were followed up for 33 (16.5-69.5) months.Results:Of the 101 patients enrolled (67.4±10.9 yrs, F/M ratio 65/36), 53 (52.5%) and 37 (36.6%) respectively satisfied the CTD and IPAF criteria. Eleven patients (10.9%) did not satisfy IPAF criteria because of only 1 item (clinical or serologic) within the IPAF domains and a UIP pattern; we defined this group as “autoimmune” UIP (AI-UIP). All the 8 patients initially classified as undifferentiated CTD had sufficient IPAF criteria. Among the IPAF patients (68.2±10.1 years, F/M ratio 20/17), the most common findings were: Nonspecific interstitial pneumonia pattern (56.8%), antinuclear antibodies positivity (43.2%) and arthritis (24.3%). The combination of a positive morphologic and serologic domain was the most common to reach the diagnosis (48.6%). Some IPAF patients had features not included in IPAF criteria, such as non-anti-synthetase myositis-specific antibodies (21.6%), objective sicca syndrome (13.5%) and anti-myeloperoxidase antibodies (2.7%). Over a median of 17 months, 2 IPAF patients (5.4%) developed a definite UIP pattern, while 4 (10.8%) a specific CTD. Comparing the IPAF, CTD-ILD and AI-UIP groups, no statistically significant differences were found in the mean age, sex distribution, smoking habits and mean duration of the disease. However, IPAF patients had a significantly higher prevalence of arterial hypertension and left-sided heart failure and a lower predominance of UIP pattern as expected (10.8% vs. 32.1% vs. 100%, p<0.01). Although no differences were found at the diagnosis, at 1 year the proportion of IPAF patients with radiological progression of the fibrosis and/or functional deterioration (defined by a decline in FVC of ≥ 10% and/or DLCO of ≥ 15% predicted) was lower to that of CTD-ILD and AI-UIP (17.1% vs. 31.4% vs. 63.6%, p 0.01). Fewer IPAF patients needed oxygen support (8.6% vs. 31.4% vs. 36.4, p 0.02). Considering the overall 101 patients, having an IPAF and a UIP pattern respectively predicted a slower (OR: 0.37, p 0.04) and a faster (OR: 3.56, p 0.01) ILD progression at the multivariate analysis.Conclusion:In our cohort, IPAF criteria were useful to identify a subset of patients with a slower ILD progression and a possible evolution to CTD (10-15% of cases) [2]. These criteria do not characterize all the patients with a UIP pattern and limited features of autoimmunity, which seem to have a worse prognosis, independently from the final diagnosis. Further studies are needed to clarify if the prognosis of AI-UIP is different from that of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.References:[1]Graney, et al. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2019;16(5):525-33.[2]Sebastiani, et al. Biomedicines 2021,9,17.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

scholarly journals Mortality rate in rheumatoid arthritis-related interstitial lung disease: the role of radiographic patterns

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria A. Nieto ◽  
Maria J. Rodriguez-Nieto ◽  
Olga Sanchez-Pernaute ◽  
Fredeswinda Romero-Bueno ◽  
Leticia Leon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Interstitial Lung Disease ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
General Population ◽  
Lung Disease ◽  
Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Usual Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Multiple Regression Model ◽  
Multicentric Study

Abstract Background To assess mortality rate (MR) and standardized mortality rate (SMR) of rheumatoid arthritis-related interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) patients and to evaluate the role of radiographic patterns in mortality. Methods A longitudinal multicentric study was conducted in RA-ILD patients from 2005 to 2015 and followed-up until October 2018 in Madrid. Patients were included in the Neumologia-Reumatología y Enfermedades Autoinmunes Registry, from diagnosis of ILD. The main outcome was all-cause mortality. The radiographic pattern at baseline [usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP), nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP), or others] was the independent variable. Covariables included sociodemographic and clinical data. Survival techniques were used to estimate MR, expressed per 1000 persons-year with their 95% confidence intervals [CI]. Cox multiple regression model was run to examine the influence of radiographic patterns on survival. SMR [CI] was calculated comparing MR obtained with MR expected in the general population of Madrid by indirect age-gender standardization. Results 47 patients were included with a follow-up 242 patients-year. There were 16 (34%) deaths, and most frequent causes were acute ILD exacerbation and pneumonia. MR was 64.3 [39.4–104.9], and 50% of the patients died at 8.3 years from ILD diagnosis. After adjusting for confounders, (UIP compared to NSIP was associated with higher mortality risk. The overall SMR was 2.57 [1.4–4.17]. Women of 60–75 years of age were the group with the highest SMR. Conclusions RA-ILD is associated with an excess of mortality compared to general population. Our results support that UIP increases the risk of mortality in RA-ILD, regardless other factors.

scholarly journals Expression of HSP47 in Usual Interstitial Pneumonia and Nonspecific Interstitial Pneumonia

2005 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomoyuki Kakugawa ◽  
Hiroshi Mukae ◽  
Tomayoshi Hayashi ◽  
Hiroshi Ishii ◽  
Seiko Nakayama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Usual Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Nonspecific Interstitial Pneumonia
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document