Subject retention and adherence in a randomized placebo-controlled trial of a disease-modifying osteoarthritis drug

2004 ◽  
Vol 51 (6) ◽  
pp. 933-940 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven A. Mazzuca ◽  
Kenneth D. Brandt ◽  
Barry P. Katz ◽  
Kathleen A. Lane ◽  
John D. Bradley ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Zhao ◽  
Wei Zhou ◽  
Yangfeng Wu ◽  
Xiaoyan Yan ◽  
Li Yang ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundTumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) have been widely used in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who failed to conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs). But how to prevent relapse after discontinuation of TNFi remains challengeable.MethodsRA patients who failed to csDMARDs received an induction therapy of MTX+TNFi for maximally 12 weeks. Those achieving LDA in 12 weeks were randomly assigned at a 1:1:1 ratio into three groups: (A) adding hydroxychloroquine and sulfasalazine for the first 12 weeks and then discontinuing TNFi for the following 48 weeks; (B) maintaining TNFi+MTX for 60 weeks; and (C) maintaining TNFi+MTX for the first 12 weeks and then discontinuing TNFi for the following 48 weeks. The primary outcome was relapse.Results117 patients were enrolled for induction therapy and 67 patients who achieved LDA within 12 weeks were randomized, with 24, 21 and 22 patients in each group. The relapse rates during 60 weeks were comparable between group A and B [10/22 (45.5%) vs 7/20 (35%), p=0.491], however, both significantly lower than that of group C [17/20 (85%), p=0.019, p=0.004, respectively]. Taken ¥100000 as the threshold of willingness to pay, compared to MTX monotherapy, both TNFi maintenance and triple csDMARDs therapies were cost-effective, but triple therapy was better.ConclusionFor RA patients achieving LDA with TNFi and MTX, csDMARDs triple therapy was a cost-effective option in favor of reducing relapse.Trial registrationRegistration number: NCT02320630.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1011.2-1012
Author(s):  
K. Katayama ◽  
T. Okubo ◽  
K. Yujiro ◽  
R. Fukai ◽  
T. Sato ◽  
...  

Background:Japanese double-blind clinical practice studies of Iguratimod (IGU) for active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients indicated an early and sustained efficacy as a new conventional synthetic disease-modyfing anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) [1] as well as the safety of the treatment[2]. IGU also inhibit activation of NFkB and production of RANKL, indicating strong inhibiting activity against bone destruction. However, studies focused on the inhibitory effects of joint destruction by IGU has been poorly documented in clinical practice (3).Objectives:To evaluate inhibitory effect during 1 year by additional IGU therapy in 116 RA patients despite csDMARDs therapy.Methods:Inhibitory effects of joint damage were evaluated by modified total Sharp scoring (mTSS) at baseline and 1 year after IGU prescription. RA activity was measured by DAS28-ESR.Results:The subjects were 116 cases, 30 male, age 63.2 yrs, disease duration 93.7 months. MTX was used weekly (84 cases, 72.4%), and cs DMARDs were used as BUC 43 cases, SASP 13 cases, TAC 5 cases, and LEF 1 cases. bDMARDs were used even in 8 cases, and steroids were used in 3.9 mg (70 cases, 60.3 %). Complications were observed in 70 cases (60.3%). DAS28-ESR were significantly improved from 4.29 (baseline) to 3.65 (6 months), 3.68 (12 months), respectively (P<0.0001). As shown in Figure 1, joint destruction measured by mTSS was significantly suppressed from 7.74 to 0.57 at 1 year (P<0.0001). 70.6% of patients satisfied structural remission (ΔmTSS≤0.5). Clinically relevant radiographic progression (CRRP)(mTSS>3) was observed in 10 cases (8.6%), and rapid radiographic progression(RRP) (mTSS≥5) was observed in 2 cases (1.6%). Adverse events were observed in 26 cases (22.4 %).To investigate prognostic factor for CRRP, clinical data in baseline, 6, 12 months between ten patients with CRRP and 82 patients with structural remission were compared. As shown in Table 1, longer disease duration, more SJC (P<0.05), High CRP level(P<0.005) were prognostic for CRRP in IGU treated patients.Conclusion:Iguratimod suppressed not only clinical activities but also joint destruction in RA patients resistant to csDMARDs therapy.Table 1. Prognostic factor for CRRPReferences:[1]Ishiguro N, Yamamoto K, Katayama K et al. Concomitant iguratimod therapy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite stable doses of methotrexate a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Mod Rheumatol. 2013;23(3):430-9[2]Hara M, Ishiguro N, Katayama K et al. Safety and efficacy of combination therapy of iguratimod with methotrexate for patients with active rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to methotrexate: an open-level extension of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Mod Rheumatol. 2014;24(3):410–8.[3]Ishikawa K, Ishikawa J.Iguratimod, a synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug inhibiting the activation of NF-jB and production of RANKL: Its efficacy, radiographic changes,safety and predictors over two years’ treatment for Japanese rheumatoid arthritis patients. Mod.Rheumatol.2019,29(3), 418–429.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. e055019
Author(s):  
Lucy Vivash ◽  
Kelly L Bertram ◽  
Charles B Malpas ◽  
Cassandra Marotta ◽  
Ian H Harding ◽  
...  

IntroductionProgressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) is a neurodegenerative disorder for which there are currently no disease-modifying therapies. The neuropathology of PSP is associated with the accumulation of hyperphosphorylated tau in the brain. We have previously shown that protein phosphatase 2 activity in the brain is upregulated by sodium selenate, which enhances dephosphorylation. Therefore, the objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sodium selenate as a disease-modifying therapy for PSP.Methods and analysisThis will be a multi-site, phase 2b, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of sodium selenate. 70 patients will be recruited at six Australian academic hospitals and research institutes. Following the confirmation of eligibility at screening, participants will be randomised (1:1) to receive 52 weeks of active treatment (sodium selenate; 15 mg three times a day) or matching placebo. Regular safety and efficacy visits will be completed throughout the study period. The primary study outcome is change in an MRI volume composite (frontal lobe+midbrain–3rd ventricle) over the treatment period. Analysis will be with a general linear model (GLM) with the MRI composite at 52 weeks as the dependent variable, treatment group as an independent variable and baseline MRI composite as a covariate. Secondary outcomes are change in PSP rating scale, clinical global impression of change (clinician) and change in midbrain mean diffusivity. These outcomes will also be analysed with a GLM as above, with the corresponding baseline measure entered as a covariate. Secondary safety and tolerability outcomes are frequency of serious adverse events, frequency of down-titration occurrences and frequency of study discontinuation. Additional, as yet unplanned, exploratory outcomes will include analyses of other imaging, cognitive and biospecimen measures.Ethics and disseminationThe study was approved by the Alfred Health Ethics Committee (594/20). Each participant or their legally authorised representative and their study partner will provide written informed consent at trial commencement. The results of the study will be presented at national and international conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration numberAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12620001254987).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document