scholarly journals Systemic lupus erythematosus measures: British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG), European Consensus Lupus Activity Measurement (ECLAM), Systemic Lupus Activity Measure (SLAM), Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Measure (SLEDAI), and Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology-Damage Index (SLICC/ACR-DI; SDI)

2003 ◽  
Vol 49 (S5) ◽  
pp. S225-S233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman ◽  
David A. Isenberg
2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 368
Author(s):  
Margarida Jacinto ◽  
Eliana Silva ◽  
Nuno Riso ◽  
Maria Francisca Moraes-Fontes

Introduction: Severity in systemic lupus erythematosus may vary from mild to even fatal consequences. There are no biomarkers to predict the disease’s prognosis. The Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/ Systemic Damage Index defines systemic lupus erythematosus disease severity and is found to predict prognosis.Objective: To test damage determinants in a single-centre systemic lupus erythematosus cohort.Material and Methods: Retrospectively followed systemic lupus erythematosus female patients (defined by the identification of at least four systemic lupus erythematosus American College of Rheumatology criteria – fulfillment 100%, n = 76) over the past five years. Age of onset, ethnicity, disease duration, number of American College of Rheumatology criteria at the end of follow-up, cumulative: renal, neuropsychiatric and articular phenotypes, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, smoking and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2K were correlated to the presence and degree of irreversible damage (Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics Damage Index). Accumulation of American College of Rheumatology criteria was measured in a sub-group of patients followed from disease onset (within a year of the first symptom ascribed to systemic lupus erythematosus) (n = 39 – 51%); Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index and Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics Damage Index were performed. Statistical analysis was performed using Chi-square, Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney tests and Spearman correlation rho (Sig. 2-tailed p < 0.05).Results: Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/Systemic Damage Index > 0 was present in 56.6% and significantly associated to a longer duration, a higher number of American College of Rheumatology criteria and a neuropsychiatric phenotype when compared with those with no damage. The final number of American College of Rheumatology criteria accrued was positively correlated to a higher disease activity over the past five years of follow-up (Spearman´s rho 0.02 and p < 0.05). There was no effect from other features.Discussion and Conclusion: Disease duration and number of American College of Rheumatology criteria predict Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/ Systemic Damage Index. neuropsychiatric disease has an impact on damage accrual.


2010 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 450-453 ◽  
Author(s):  
TARANEH MEHRANI ◽  
MICHELLE PETRI

Objective.Antibodies to ß2glycoprotein I (IgG and IgM isotypes) have recently been added to the laboratory criteria of the revised antiphospholipid syndrome classification criteria. We investigated whether IgM anti-ß2-glycoprotein I (anti-ß2-GPI) is associated with clinical manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).Methods.Anti-ß2-GPI was measured in 796 patients with SLE (93% women, 53% white, 38% African American, mean age 45 yrs). IgM anti-ß2-GPI (> 20 phospholipid units) was found in 16%. Associations were determined with clinical manifestations of SLE and with components of the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index.Results.As expected, IgM anti-ß2-GPI was highly associated with both the lupus anticoagulant and with anticardiolipin. It was associated with transient ischemic attack (OR 2.64, p = 0.04), but not significantly with venous or arterial thrombosis. IgM anti-ß2-GPI was protective against lupus nephritis (OR 0.54, p = 0.049), renal damage (p = 0.019), and hypertension (OR 0.58, p = 0.008). This protective effect remained after adjustment for ethnicity.Conclusion.In SLE, IgM anti-ß2-GPI is not associated with thrombosis but is protective against lupus nephritis and renal damage. “Natural” autoantibodies of the IgM isotype may have a protective effect.


Lupus ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (7) ◽  
pp. 1081-1087 ◽  
Author(s):  
T A Gheita ◽  
N M Abaza ◽  
N Hammam ◽  
A A A Mohamed ◽  
I I El-Gazzar ◽  
...  

Background Attempts are ongoing to unveil unresolved queries about anti-double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid (anti-dsDNA), their precise pathogenic effects and to what extent blocking them would be a useful therapeutic goal. Objectives The aim of the present study was to determine the anti-dsDNA antibodies titre in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients and investigate their relation to the disease characteristics, activity, damage and antiphospholipid autoantibodies (aPL). Methods Seventy female SLE patients and 35 age- and sex-matched controls were included. The anti-dsDNA level and aPL were measured. Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) and Systemic Lupus International Collaborative Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index (SLICC/ACR-DI) were assessed. Results The mean age of the patients was 27.5 ± 5.1 years, disease duration 7.7 ± 5.4 years, and SLEDAI and SLICC/ACR-DI scores were 6.8 ± 8.04 and 1.2 ± 1.3, respectively. Anti-dsDNA was positive in 61.4% of the patients and the titre (133.2 ± 100.5 IU/ml) was significantly higher compared to controls (22.03 ± 17.2 IU/ml) ( p < 0.0001). The anti-dsDNA level was significantly increased in those with musculoskeletal manifestations ( p = 0.007) and positive anti-β2 glycoprotein (anti-β2GP) ( p = 0.037) and decreased in those with neuropsychiatric manifestations ( p = 0.004) and those receiving cyclophosphamide (CYC) ( p = 0.013). The anti-dsDNA level tended to be higher in active patients. The anti-dsDNA titre significantly correlated with the erythrocyte sedimentation rate ( p = 0.001), anticardiolipin IgG and IgA antibodies ( p = 0.008) and anti-β2GP IgG ( p = 0.03) and IgA ( p = 0.002) and inversely with the total leucocytic count ( p < 0.0001) and SLICC/ACR-DI ( p = 0.001). Conclusion Anti-dsDNA is remarkably increased in SLE patients especially those with musculoskeletal manifestations and aPL. A protective role seems likely in those with neuropsychiatric manifestations and those receiving CYC and may form a shield against disease tissue damage.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 675.1-676
Author(s):  
K. Pawlak-Bus ◽  
W. Schmidt ◽  
P. Leszczynski

Background:Distinguishing primary NPSLE (neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus) from secondary causes remains challenging (1). Attribution models were developed in order to aim clinicians in correct classification of NPSLE cases (2).Objectives:To investigate the prevalence of primary NPSLE manifestations assigned with Italian model of attribution (2).Methods:We retrospectively assessed clinical details of 164 patients with SLE classified with 2012 SLICC (Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics) classification criteria, 21 were excluded due to incomplete information. Data was gathered with a questionnaire comprising demographics, medical history, laboratory results (concentrations of antibodies against double stranded DNA – anti-dsDNA, complement components C3 and C4), disease activity measured with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) and Physician Global Assessment (PGA) and damage determined with SLICC/ACR (American College of Rheumatology) Damage Index (SDI). Neuropsychiatric manifestations were categorized in accordance with 1999 ACR glossary and attribution of manifestations was performed with the use of Italian model with the score ≥7 out of 10 points enabling assignment to primary NPSLE group (2). Statistical analysis was conducted with Statistica v.13.3 using Mann-Whitney U, chi-square and Fisher exact test.Results:We encountered 155 NP manifestations in our cohort and 52 (34%) were attributed to SLE. Characteristics of the study groups are presented in Table 1. Exact manifestations and their attribution rates are presented on Graph 1. Patients with attributable NPSLE were younger, had earlier disease onset, presented higher disease activity, lower damage accrual without taking NP damage into account and more often had increased anti-dsDNA serum concentration.Table 1.Demographic and laboratory characteristics with disease activity and damage of the study groups, N(%) or mean(±SD).CharacteristicPatients with attributed NPSLE manifestationsPatients without attributed NPSLE manifestationsPatients34 (23.8%)109 (76.2%)Sex, female30 (88.2%)102 (93.6%)Age (years)37.6 (±11.7)44.3 (±13.9)*Age of disease onset (years)32.5 (±11.4)37.6 (±12.6)*Disease duration (years)5.1 (±4.1)6.8 (±5.6)SLEDAI-2K29.2 (±10.7)12.2 (±8.1)*patients with clinically active disease (defined as SLEDAI-2K≥6 in clinical manifestations)34 (100%)93 (85.3%)*SLEDAI-2K without NP manifestations14.8 (±8.4)11.0 (±6.7)*PGA2.1 (±1.0)1.2 (±1.0)*SDI0.5 (±0.8)0.7 (±1.1)SDI without NP damage0.3 (±0.6)0.7 (±1.1)*low C3/C4 complement component concentration in serum21 (61.8%)55 (50.4%)elevated anti-dsDNA autoantibody concentration in serum27 (79.4%)55 (50.4%)*NPSLE – neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus, SLEDAI-2K – Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index version 2000, PGA – physician global assessment, SDI – SLICC/ACR (Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology) Damage Index*p<0,05, Mann-Whitney U, χ2or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriateConclusion:Primary NP manifestations in patients with SLE occur mainly in young patients with high disease activity. Cerebrovascular disease, seizures, psychosis and cranial neuropathy are most frequent primary NPSLE manifestations.References:[1]The American College of Rheumatology nomenclature and case definitions for neuropsychiatric lupus syndromes. Arthritis Rheum. 1999;42(4):599–608.[2]Bortoluzzi A, Scirè CA, Bombardieri S, Caniatti L, Conti F, De Vita S, et al. Development and validation of a new algorithm for attribution of neuropsychiatric events in systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatol Oxf Engl. 2015;54(5):891–8.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document