Imaging in the ground-penetrating radar near-field zone: a case study from New Mexico, USA

2006 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 154-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eileen G. Ernenwein
Keyword(s):  
New Mexico ◽  
Ground Penetrating Radar ◽  
Near Field ◽  
Field Zone ◽  
Ground Penetrating

scholarly journals Ground penetrating radar: a case study for estimating root bulking rate in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)

Plant Methods ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alfredo Delgado ◽  
Dirk B. Hays ◽  
Richard K. Bruton ◽  
Hernán Ceballos ◽  
Alexandre Novo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ground Penetrating Radar ◽  
Manihot Esculenta ◽  
Manihot Esculenta Crantz ◽  
Ground Penetrating ◽  
Bulking Rate

WISDOM Antenna Pattern in the presence of Rover and Soil

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolf-Stefan Benedix ◽  
Dirk Plettemeier ◽  
Christoph Statz ◽  
Yun Lu ◽  
Ronny Hahnel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pattern Matching ◽  
Ground Penetrating Radar ◽  
Electromagnetic Waves ◽  
Complete System ◽  
Near Field ◽  
System Model ◽  
Soil Types ◽  
Broadband Antenna ◽  
Shallow Subsurface ◽  
Ground Penetrating

<p>The WISDOM ground-penetrating radar aboard the 2022 ESA-Roscosmos Rosalind-Franklin ExoMars Rover will probe the shallow subsurface of Oxia Planum using electromagnetic waves. A dual-polarized broadband antenna assembly transmits the WISDOM signal into the Martian subsurface and receives the return signal. This antenna assembly has been extensively tested and characterized w.r.t. the most significant antenna parameters (gain, pattern, matching). However, during the design phase, these parameters were simulated or measured without the environment, i.e., in the absence of other objects like brackets, rover vehicle, or soil. Some measurements of the rover's influence on the WISDOM data were performed during the instrument's integration.</p><p>It was shown that the rover structure and close surroundings in the near-field region of the WISDOM antenna assembly have a significant impact on the WISDOM signal and sounding performance. Hence, it is essential to include the simulations' environment, especially with varying surface and underground.</p><p>With this contribution, we outline the influences of rover and ground on the antenna's pattern and particularly on the footprint. We employ a 3D field solver with a complete system model above different soil types, i.e., subsurface materials with various combinations of permittivity and conductivity.</p>

Understanding the use of ground-penetrating radar for assessing clandestine tunnel detection

2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 453-459
Author(s):  
Nectaria Diamanti ◽  
A. Peter Annan
Keyword(s):  
Ground Penetrating Radar ◽  
Minimal Amount ◽  
Operational Environment ◽  
Field Case ◽  
Tunnel Detection ◽  
Specific Focus ◽  
Key Aspects ◽  
Ground Penetrating

We provide a coherent approach for developing an understanding of how and where ground-penetrating radar (GPR) can be deployed for tunnel detection. While tunnels in general are of interest, the more specific focus is tunnels that are hand dug or created with a minimal amount of equipment and resources for clandestine purposes. Determining whether GPR can be used for tunnel detection is impossible without an in-depth knowledge of the operational environment and constraints. To effectively address the question, we define the general characteristics of clandestine tunnels, discuss how to estimate the responses amplitude, define the dominant noise types associated with GPR data, and point out how those factors are affected by the GPR system. The key aspects are illustrated using a controlled field case study.

scholarly journals On the errors involved in ice-thickness estimates I: ground-penetrating radar measurement errors

2016 ◽  
Vol 62 (236) ◽  
pp. 1008-1020 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.J. LAPAZARAN ◽  
J. OTERO ◽  
A. MARTÍN-ESPAÑOL ◽  
F.J. NAVARRO
Keyword(s):  
Ground Penetrating Radar ◽  
Measurement Errors ◽  
Ice Thickness ◽  
Independent Components ◽  
Ice Volume ◽  
Thickness Error ◽  
Grid Points ◽  
Ground Penetrating ◽  
Volume Estimates

ABSTRACTThis is the first (Paper I) of three companion papers focused respectively, on the estimates of the errors in ice thickness retrieved from pulsed ground-penetrating radar (GPR) data, on how to estimate the errors at the grid points of an ice-thickness DEM, and on how the latter errors, plus the boundary delineation errors, affect the ice-volume estimates. We here present a comprehensive analysis of the various errors involved in the computation of ice thickness from pulsed GPR data, assuming they have been properly migrated. We split the ice-thickness error into independent components that can be estimated separately. We consider, among others, the effects of the errors in radio-wave velocity and timing. A novel aspect is the estimate of the error in thickness due to the uncertainty in horizontal positioning of the GPR measurements, based on the local thickness gradient. Another novel contribution is the estimate of the horizontal positioning error of the GPR measurements due to the velocity of the GPR system while profiling, and the periods of GPS refreshing and GPR triggering. Their effects are particularly important for airborne profiling. We illustrate our methodology through a case study of Werenskioldbreen, Svalbard.

Karst features interpretation using ground-penetrating radar: A case study from the Sierra de Atapuerca, Spain

Geomorphology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 367 ◽  
pp. 107311
Author(s):  
Lucía Bermejo ◽  
Ana Isabel Ortega ◽  
Josep M. Parés ◽  
Isidoro Campaña ◽  
José María Bermúdez de Castro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ground Penetrating Radar ◽  
Ground Penetrating
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document