Archaeological prospection north of Schinias rowing centre in Marathon at the site of ancient Trikorynthos

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grigorios N. Tsokas ◽  
Panagiotis I. Tsourlos ◽  
G. Steinhauer ◽  
Alexandros Stampolidis ◽  
George Vargemezis ◽  
...  
Geosciences ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 26
Author(s):  
Edisa Lozić ◽  
Benjamin Štular

Airborne LiDAR is a widely accepted tool for archaeological prospection. Over the last decade an archaeology-specific data processing workflow has been evolving, ranging from raw data acquisition and processing, point cloud processing and product derivation to archaeological interpretation, dissemination and archiving. Currently, though, there is no agreement on the specific steps or terminology. This workflow is an interpretative knowledge production process that must be documented as such to ensure the intellectual transparency and accountability required for evidence-based archaeological interpretation. However, this is rarely the case, and there are no accepted schemas, let alone standards, to do so. As a result, there is a risk that the data processing steps of the workflow will be accepted as a black box process and its results as “hard data”. The first step in documenting a scientific process is to define it. Therefore, this paper provides a critical review of existing archaeology-specific workflows for airborne LiDAR-derived topographic data processing, resulting in an 18-step workflow with consistent terminology. Its novelty and significance lies in the fact that the existing comprehensive studies are outdated and the newer ones focus on selected aspects of the workflow. Based on the updated workflow, a good practice example for its documentation is presented.


2009 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. e41-e48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristiana Bassani ◽  
Rosa Maria Cavalli ◽  
Roberto Goffredo ◽  
Angelo Palombo ◽  
Simone Pascucci ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 2384
Author(s):  
Roland Filzwieser ◽  
Vujadin Ivanišević ◽  
Geert J. Verhoeven ◽  
Christian Gugl ◽  
Klaus Löcker ◽  
...  

Large parts of the urban layout of the abandoned Roman town of Bassianae (in present-day Serbia) are still discernible on the surface today due to the deliberate and targeted quarrying of the Roman foundations. In 2014, all of the town's intramural (and some extramural) areas were surveyed using aerial photography, ground-penetrating radar, and magnetometry to analyze the site's topography and to map remaining buried structures. The surveys showed a strong agreement between the digital surface model derived from the aerial photographs and the geophysical prospection data. However, many structures could only be detected by one method, underlining the benefits of a complementary archaeological prospection approach using multiple methods. This article presents the results of the extensive surveys and their comprehensive integrative interpretation, discussing Bassianae's ground plan and urban infrastructure. Starting with an overview of this Roman town's research history, we present the details of the triple prospection approach, followed by the processing, integrative analysis, and interpretation of the acquired data sets. Finally, this newly gained information is contrasted with a plan of Roman Bassianae compiled in 1935.


2008 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 882-893 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Doneus ◽  
Christian Briese ◽  
Martin Fera ◽  
Martin Janner

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
David Fairbairn

The use of maps and other geovisualisation methods has been longstanding in archaeology. Archaeologists employ advanced contemporary tools in their data collection, analysis and presentation. Maps can be used to render the ‘big data’ commonly collected by archaeological prospection techniques, but are also fundamental output instru-ments for the dissemination of archaeological interpretation and modelling. This paper addresses, through case studies, alternate methods of geovisualisation in archaeology and identifies the efficiencies of each.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document