Identification, accumulation, and biosynthesis of the cuticular hydrocarbons of the southern armyworm,Spodoptera eridania (cramer) (lepidoptera: Noctuidae)

1991 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lin Guo ◽  
Gary J. Blomquist
Genomics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 112 (6) ◽  
pp. 3903-3914 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela T. Rodrigues ◽  
Lenen Peterson ◽  
Lucas Boeni de Oliveira ◽  
Daniel R. Sosa-Gómez ◽  
Bergmann Morais Ribeiro ◽  
...  

EDIS ◽  
1969 ◽  
Vol 2002 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
John L. Capinera

This document is EENY-106, one of a series of the Entomology and Nematology Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. Original publication date August 1999. Reviewed May 2003. https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/in263


2005 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 903-910 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen B. dos Santos ◽  
Ana M. Meneguim ◽  
Pedro M.O.J. Neves

2010 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 626-631 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen B dos Santos ◽  
Ana M Meneguim ◽  
Walter J dos Santos ◽  
Pedro M O J Neves ◽  
Rachel B dos Santos

2005 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 204-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moacyr Mascarenhas Motta Miranda ◽  
Marcelo Coutinho Picanço ◽  
José Cola Zanuncio ◽  
Leandro Bacci ◽  
Ézio Marques da Silva

The objective of this work was to evaluate the impact of integrated pest management (IPM) in the productivity of the tomato and in the populations of leafminers, fruit borers, and natural enemies in tomato crops. The treatments were calendar (spraying twice weekly with insecticides and fungicides), IPM (spraying when action thresholds were achieved), and control (no pesticide was applied). IPM was the most efficient system of pest control due to presenting similar productivity and 65.6% less pesticide applications than in the calendar. The attack of Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) and Liriomyza spp. (Diptera: Agromyzidae) to the leaves only achieved the action threshold in the final phase of the cultivation. The main fruit borer was Neoleucinoides elegantalis (Guen.) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae), followed by T. absoluta and Spodoptera eridania (Cr.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). The natural enemy populations were severely reduced by excessive pesticide applications. Predators were more abundant than parasitoids. The most abundant predators were Araneidae, Anthicus sp. (Coleoptera: Anthicidae), Cycloneda sanguinea larva (L.) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), Staphylinidae adults (Coleoptera), Orius sp. and Xylocoris sp. (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae), Formicidae (Hymenoptera), and Phlaeothripidae (Thysanoptera). The most abundant parasitoids were Hymenoptera of the families Eulophidae, Braconidae (Bracon sp. and Chelonus sp.), Trichogrammatidae [Trichogramma pretiosum (Riley)] and Bethylidae (Goniozus nigrifemur Ashmead), besides Tachinidae (Diptera).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document