The coercive control of Daniel and Magdalena Lucek: A case of child abuse as tangential spouse abuse

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 262-276
Author(s):  
Evan Stark
2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
pp. 1512-1538 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan L. Haselschwerdt ◽  
Kathleen Hlavaty ◽  
Camille Carlson ◽  
Mallory Schneider ◽  
Lauren Maddox ◽  
...  

Using Holden’s taxonomy of domestic violence (DV) exposure as a guiding framework, the current study examined young adults’ diverse DV exposure experiences. Twenty-five young adults (ages 19-25) exposed to father-perpetrated DV during their childhood and adolescence were interviewed using a qualitative descriptive design. Data analyses focused on coercive control exposure through reports of non-physical abuse tactics, types of exposure (e.g., direct, indirect), physical violence exposure (e.g., severity, frequency), and child abuse and harsh parenting practices. DV-exposed young adults were directly and indirectly exposed to physical violence and an array of non-physical abuse tactics toward their mothers. Young adults categorized as having been exposed to coercive controlling violence reported exposure to ongoing, non-physical abuse tactics and more frequent and severe physical violence. These young adults were also more likely to intervene and become victimized during physical violence and reported repeated episodes of child abuse and harsh parenting. Although coercive control appeared to be associated with physical violence and child abuse, generalizations should be made with caution as a few participants exposed to situational conflict were exposed to frequent and severe DV. The findings suggest that DV exposure should be measured in methodologically sophisticated ways to capture the heterogeneity in experiences, with the goal of promoting empirically driven intervention and prevention initiatives that are tailored to individual and family needs.


2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 458-468 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra L. Martin ◽  
Deborah A. Gibbs ◽  
Ruby E. Johnson ◽  
E. Danielle Rentz ◽  
Monique Clinton-Sherrod ◽  
...  

Army data from 2000 to 2004 were used to compare two groups of married, male, Army soldier, first-time family violence offenders: 760 dual offenders (whose initial incident included both child maltreatment and spouse abuse) and 2,209 single offenders (whose initial incident included only child maltreatment). The majority (81%) of dual offenders perpetrated physical spouse abuse; however, dual offenders were less likely than single offenders to perpetrate physical child abuse (16% vs. 42%) or sexual child abuse (1% vs. 11%), but they were more likely to perpetrate emotional child abuse (45% vs. 12%). These findings may be, at least in part, explained in light of the Army Family Advocacy Program policy, which considers spouse offenders as also being emotional child abuse offenders since children may be traumatized by exposure to spouse abuse.


2004 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 137-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joe F. Pittman ◽  
Chih-Yuan S. Lee

This study examined differences in offenders’ background characteristics, personal and interpersonal problems, and family climate between three types of child abuse offenders (neglecters, physical abusers, and psychological abusers) and two forms of spouse abuse offenders (physical abusers and psychological abusers) in two large samples (child abuse n = 2,910; spouse abuse; n = 7,035) of cases officially identified over a 8-year period (1988-1995) by the U.S. Air Force Family Advocacy Program. Comparisons addressed demographic factors, personal and interpersonal problems, and aspects of family climate. Among child abusers, results supported the conclusion that types of child abuse varied with offender demographics and family climate factors. For spouse abusers, however, types of abuse were not as distinctly different in terms of the comparison variables. In general, therefore, for child abuse—but not for spouse abuse—findings challenge the view of abuse as a unitary phenomenon.


2007 ◽  
Vol 22 (7) ◽  
pp. 587-595 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra L. Martin ◽  
Deborah A. Gibbs ◽  
Ruby E. Johnson ◽  
E. Danielle Rentz ◽  
Monique Clinton-Sherrod ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 24 (11) ◽  
pp. 1375-1381 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter D Rumm ◽  
Peter Cummings ◽  
Margot R Krauss ◽  
Michelle A Bell ◽  
Frederick P Rivara
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Dennis C. Daley ◽  
Antoine Douaihy

The effects of SUDs on family members are well documented. Some people grow stronger through exposure to an SUD in their family despite negative effects. They show resilience. There is evidence that children of parents with an SUD are at higher risk for problems than are children whose parents do not have an SUD. Problems include those related to substance use, health or mental health, trouble with the law, and problems at work or in school. Parental SUDs underlie many family problems such as divorce, spouse abuse, child abuse and neglect, welfare dependence, and criminal behaviors. Studies show that women who use alcohol or drugs during pregnancy are more likely to have premature births.


1995 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 251-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik Sorensen ◽  
Jacquelin Goldman ◽  
Martin Ward ◽  
Ilana Albanese ◽  
Linda Graves ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 136-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin D. Browne ◽  
Catherine E. Hamilton
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document