Polymerization shrinkage/stress and dentin bond strength of silorane and dimethacrylate-based dental composites

2011 ◽  
Vol 124 (1) ◽  
pp. 436-443 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuncong Li ◽  
Xiang Sun ◽  
Jihua Chen ◽  
Jie Xiong ◽  
Xiaoyi Hu
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Dental Composites ◽  
Shrinkage Stress ◽  
Polymerization Shrinkage

Polymerization Shrinkage Stress, Internal Adaptation, and Dentin Bond Strength of Bulk-fill Restorative Materials

2021 ◽  
pp. 102964
Author(s):  
Beatriz Curvello de Mendonça ◽  
Beatriz de Cássia Romano ◽  
Maicon Sebold ◽  
Bruna Marin Fronza ◽  
Roberto Ruggiero Braga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shrinkage Stress ◽  
Polymerization Shrinkage ◽  
Restorative Materials ◽  
Internal Adaptation

scholarly journals Photoelastic evaluation of the effect of composite formulation on polymerization shrinkage stress

2012 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 202-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karla Mychellyne Costa Oliveira ◽  
Simonides Consani ◽  
Luciano Souza Gonçalves ◽  
William Cunha Brandt ◽  
Renzo Alberto Ccahuana-Vásquez
Keyword(s):  
Shrinkage Stress ◽  
Polymerization Shrinkage

Effect of Shortened Light-Curing Modes on Bulk-Fill Resin Composites

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 496-505
Author(s):  
CS Sampaio ◽  
PG Pizarro ◽  
PJ Atria ◽  
R Hirata ◽  
M Giannini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tensile Strength ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Light Output ◽  
High Mode ◽  
Resin Composites ◽  
Curing Time ◽  
Micro Computed Tomography ◽  
Polymerization Shrinkage ◽  
Light Curing

Clinical Relevance Shortened light curing does not affect volumetric polymerization shrinkage or cohesive tensile strength but negatively affects the shear bond strength of some bulk-fill resin composites. When performing shortened light curing, clinicians should be aware of the light output of their light-curing units. SUMMARY Purpose: To evaluate volumetric polymerization shrinkage (VPS), shear bond strength (SBS) to dentin, and cohesive tensile strength (CTS) of bulk-fill resin composites (BFRCs) light activated by different modes. Methods and Materials: Six groups were evaluated: Tetric EvoCeram bulk fill + high mode (10 seconds; TEC H10), Tetric EvoFlow bulk fill + high mode (TEF H10), experimental bulk fill + high mode (TEE H10), Tetric EvoCeram bulk fill + turbo mode (five seconds; TEC T5), Tetric EvoFlow bulk fill + turbo mode (TEF T5), and experimental bulk fill + turbo mode (TEE T5). Bluephase Style 20i and Adhese Universal Vivapen were used for all groups. All BFRC samples were built up on human molar bur-prepared occlusal cavities. VPS% and location were evaluated through micro–computed tomography. SBS and CTS tests were performed 24 hours after storage or after 5000 thermal cycles; fracture mode was analyzed for SBS. Results: Both TEC H10 and TEE H10 presented lower VPS% than TEF H10. However, no significant differences were observed with the turbo-curing mode. No differences were observed for the same BFRC within curing modes. Occlusal shrinkage was mostly observed. Regarding SBS, thermal cycling (TC) affected all groups. Without TC, all groups showed higher SBS values for high mode than turbo mode, while with TC, only TEC showed decreased SBS from high mode to turbo modes; modes of fracture were predominantly adhesive. For CTS, TC affected all groups except TEE H10. In general, no differences were observed between groups when comparing the curing modes. Conclusions: Increased light output with a shortened curing time did not jeopardize the VPS and SBS properties of the BFRCs, although a decreased SBS was observed in some groups. TEE generally showed similar or improved values for the tested properties in a shortened light-curing time. The VPS was mostly affected by the materials tested, whereas the SBS was affected by the materials, curing modes, and TC. The CTS was not affected by the curing modes.

The Silorane-based Resin Composites: A Review

2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. E24-E34 ◽  
Author(s):  
GA Maghaireh ◽  
NA Taha ◽  
H Alzraikat
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Properties ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Clinical Significance ◽  
Physical And Mechanical Properties ◽  
Marginal Adaptation ◽  
Resin Composites ◽  
Restorative Material ◽  
Polymerization Shrinkage ◽  
Tooth Structure

SUMMARY This article aims to review the research done on the silorane-based resin composites (SBRC) regarding polymerization shrinkage and contraction stresses and their ability to improve the shortcomings of the methacrylate-based resin composites (MRBC). Special attention is given to their physical and mechanical properties, bond strength, marginal adaptation, and cusp deflection. The clinical significance of this material is critically appraised with a focus on the ability of SBRC to strengthen the tooth structure as a direct restorative material. A search of English peer-reviewed dental literature (2003-2015) from PubMed and MEDLINE databases was conducted with the terms “low shrinkage” and “silorane composites.” The list was screened, and 70 articles that were relevant to the objectives of this work were included.

scholarly journals The influence of free-radical concentration on the shear bond strength of dental composites

2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-182
Author(s):  
B. Kiteska ◽  
N. Funduk ◽  
P. Cevc ◽  
A. Jesih ◽  
A. Anžlovar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Free Radical ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Dental Composites ◽  
Radical Concentration ◽  
Free Radical Concentration

scholarly journals THE COMPARISON OF RESIN-BASED COMPOSITES PHYSICAL PROPERTIES BETWEEN BULK-FILL TECHNIQUE AND INCREMENTAL TECHNIQUE

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 85
Author(s):  
Rahmi Khairani Aulia
Keyword(s):  
Physical Properties ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Color Stability ◽  
Composite Resins ◽  
Shrinkage Stress ◽  
Restorative Material ◽  
Polymerization Shrinkage ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Restoration Technique ◽  
Restoration Failure

ABSTRACT:Composite resins are currently the most popular restorative material in dentistry. This is due to good aesthetics and maximum conservation ability. Behind these advantages, there are disbenefits of composite resin materials, such as polymerization shrinkage, which can lead to restoration failure. Various attempts have been investigated to reduce the shrinkage incidence of composite resins, one of which is the technique of placing the restorative material into the cavity. The restoration filling technique is recognized as a significant factor in shrinkage stress. By using a special filling technique, the polymerization shrinkage damage stress can be reduced. There are several techniques in performing composite resin fillings, including bulk and incremental techniques. These techniques have their respective advantages and disadvantages. The aim of this literature review was to compare the physical properties of composite resin restorations with bulk filling and incremental techniques. Physical properties that being studied include polymerization shrinkage, stress shrinkage, degree of conversion, bonding strength, water resorption, color stability, and temperature increase. Comparing the two techniques, composite resin with incremental filling technique has superior physical properties compared to bulk technique. From the comparison of the two techniques, the composite resin with incremental filling technique has superior physical properties compared to the bulk technique, especially in higher conversion which causes lower shrinkage stress. This situation makes the incremental technique provide better bond strength, water resorption, color stability, and lower temperature rise.Keywords: Bulk, Composite Resin, Incremental,  Physical Properties, Restoration, Restoration Technique

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document