scholarly journals Incidental findings on whole‐body computed tomography in trauma patients: the current state of incidental findings and the effect of implementation of a feedback system

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 274-278
Author(s):  
Keisuke Kumada ◽  
Nobuo Murakami ◽  
Hideshi Okada ◽  
Izumi Toyoda ◽  
Shinji Ogura ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482199868
Author(s):  
Ping-Yuan Liu ◽  
Ling-Wei Kuo ◽  
Chien-Hung Liao ◽  
Chi-Hsun Hsieh ◽  
Francesco Bajani ◽  
...  

Purpose Whole-body computed tomography (WBCT) scans are frequently used for trauma patients, and sometimes, nontraumatic findings are observed. We aimed to investigate the characteristics of patients with nontraumatic findings on WBCT. Methods From 2013 to 2016, adult trauma patients who underwent WBCT were enrolled. The proportions of nontraumatic findings in different anatomical regions were studied. Nontraumatic findings were classified and evaluated as clinically important findings and findings that needed no further follow-up or treatment. The characteristics of the patients with nontraumatic findings were analyzed and compared with those of patients without nontraumatic findings. Results Two hundred seventeen patients were enrolled in this study during the 3-year study period, and 89 (41.0%) patients had nontraumatic findings. Nontraumatic findings were found more frequently in the abdomen (69.2%) than in the head/neck (17.3%) and chest regions (13.5%). In total, 31.3% of the findings needed further follow-up or treatment. Patients with nontraumatic findings that needed further management were significantly older than those without nontraumatic findings (57.3 vs. 38.9; P < .001), particularly those with abdominal nontraumatic findings (57.9 vs. 41.3; P < .001). A significantly higher proportion of women were observed in the group with head/neck nontraumatic findings that needed further management than in the group without nontraumatic findings (56.3% vs 24.9%; P = .015). Conclusions Whole-body computed tomography could provide alternative benefits for nontraumatic findings. Whole-body computed tomography images should be read carefully for nontraumatic findings, particularly for elderly patients or the head/neck region of female patients. A comprehensive program for the follow-up of nontraumatic findings is needed.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ping-Yuan Liu ◽  
Ling-Wei Kuo ◽  
Chien-Hung Liao ◽  
Chi-Hsun Hsieh ◽  
Francesco Bajani ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The use of whole-body computed tomography (WBCT) scans has greatly increased in the management of patients with major trauma. Sometimes, nontraumatic findings on WBCT are observed. In the current study, we aimed to investigate the proportion of nontraumatic findings on WBCT in major trauma patients and the characteristics of patients with nontraumatic findings on WBCT.Methods From June 2013 to May 2016, adult trauma patients who received WBCT were enrolled. The proportions of nontraumatic findings in different anatomical regions were studied. Nontraumatic findings were classified and evaluated as clinically important findings and findings that did not need further follow-up or treatment. The characteristics of patients with nontraumatic findings were analyzed and compared with those of patients without nontraumatic findings.Results A total of 217 patients were enrolled in this study during the 3-year study period, and 89 (41.0%) patients had nontraumatic findings. Nontraumatic findings were found more frequently in the abdomen (69.2%) than in the head/neck (17.3%) and chest regions (13.5%). In total, 31.3% of the findings needed further follow-up or treatment. Patients with nontraumatic findings that needed further management were significantly older than patients without nontraumatic findings (57.3 vs. 38.9, p<0.001), especially those with abdominal nontraumatic findings (57.9 vs. 41.3, p<0.001). A significantly higher proportion of females was observed in the group with head/neck nontraumatic findings that needed further management than in the group without nontraumatic findings (56.3% vs. 24.9%, p=0.015).Conclusions WBCT could provide alternative benefits for nontraumatic findings. The WBCT images should be read carefully for nontraumatic findings, especially for elderly patients. For female patients, the head/neck region should be carefully evaluated with WBCT for possible thyroid lesions. A comprehensive program for the follow-up of nontraumatic findings is needed.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Alberto Ordoñez ◽  
Michael Parra ◽  
Alfonso Holguín ◽  
Carlos Garcia ◽  
Monica Guzmán-Rodríguez ◽  
...  

Trauma is a complex pathology that requires an experienced multidisciplinary team with an inherent quick decision-making capacity, given that a few minutes could represent a matter of life or death. These management decisions not only need to be quick but also accurate to be able to prioritize and to efficiently control the injuries that may be causing impending hemodynamic collapse. In essence, this is the cornerstone of the concept of Damage Control Trauma Care. With current technological advances, physicians have at their disposition multiple diagnostic imaging tools that can aid in this prompt decision-making algorithm. This manuscript aims to perform a literature review on this subject and to share the experience on the use of Whole Body Computed Tomography as a potentially safe, effective, and efficient diagnostic tool in cases of severely injured trauma patients regardless of their hemodynamic status. Our general recommendation is that, when feasible, perform a Whole-Body Computed Tomography without interrupting ongoing hemostatic resuscitation in cases of severely injured trauma patients with or without signs of hemodynamic instability. The use of this technology will aid in the decision-making of the best surgical approach for these patients without incurring any delay in definitive management and/or increasing significantly their radiation exposure.


Author(s):  
Gökhan AKSEL ◽  
İbrahim ALTUNOK ◽  
Şeref Kerem ÇORBACIOĞLU ◽  
Hatice Şeyma AKÇA ◽  
Öner BOZAN ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 70 (4) ◽  
pp. 900-905 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jörg Bayer ◽  
Gregor Pache ◽  
Peter C. Strohm ◽  
Jörn Zwingmann ◽  
Philipp Blanke ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document