scholarly journals Treatment of a patient with acute aortic dissection using extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation after an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a case report

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 189-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takahiro Yukawa ◽  
Kazuhiro Sugiyama ◽  
Kazuki Miyazaki ◽  
Takahiro Tanabe ◽  
Susumu Ishikawa ◽  
...  
Resuscitation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 130 ◽  
pp. e48-e49
Author(s):  
Antonella Vezzani ◽  
Tullio Manca ◽  
Andrea Ramelli ◽  
Bruno Borrello ◽  
Andrea Agostinelli ◽  
...  

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Takayuki Ogura ◽  
Hiroyuki Ohbe ◽  
Hideo Yasunaga

Aim: Acute aortic dissection has been considered a contraindication for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). However, studies are lacking regarding the epidemiology and effectiveness of ECPR for this condition. We aimed to examine whether ECPR for acute aortic dissection during cardiac arrest is effective or not. Methods: Using the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination inpatient database from July 2010 to March 2018, we identified all emergently hospitalized adults who received ECPR on the day of admission. ECPR was defined as receiving both chest compressions and percutaneous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation on the day of hospital admission. In-hospital mortality and neurological outcomes were compared between patients with and without acute aortic dissection. We also calculated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of ECPR for acute aortic dissection. Results: We identified 10,238 patients who received ECPR on the day of admission. Of these, 398 patients (3.9%) had acute aortic dissection. In-hospital mortality was 98% in the acute aortic dissection group and 79% in the non-acute aortic dissection group. Seven patients (1.8%) in the acute aortic dissection group survived to discharge after ECPR; of these, six patients had good neurological outcomes at discharge. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of ECPR for patients with acute aortic dissection was estimated at 159,337 US dollars per quality-adjusted life year gained. Conclusion: ECPR successfully rescued a small number of acute aortic dissection patients with cardiac arrest; however, the cost burden of ECPR for acute aortic dissection patients was unacceptably high.


Perfusion ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 163-165
Author(s):  
Guramrinder Singh Thind ◽  
Tarik Hanane ◽  
Alejandro Bribriesco ◽  
James Yun ◽  
Balaram Anandamurthy ◽  
...  

Introduction: A fulminant pulmonary embolism is a potentially reversible cause of cardiac arrest with a reported mortality rate of up to 95%. Therapeutic strategies for fulminant pulmonary embolism continue to evolve. Case report: We present a case of a 38-year-old female who suffered an in-hospital cardiac arrest due to fulminant pulmonary embolism. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (facilitated by the LUCAS™ mechanical chest compression device) was successfully performed in this patient following failure of intraarrest thrombolysis. Discussion: For the management of fulminant pulmonary embolism, utilization of clot-directed therapies, especially intraarrest thrombolysis, has garnered increasing traction and interest. However, this therapeutic approach has its limitations. Fortuitously, the emergence of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation has added a new dimension to the treatment of fulminant pulmonary embolism. A protocolized approach to treatment can improve outcomes in these patients. Conclusion: Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation can be used as a salvage therapy in patients with fulminant pulmonary embolism in whom intraarrest thrombolysis has failed.


Author(s):  
Christopher Gaisendrees ◽  
Matias Vollmer ◽  
Sebastian G Walter ◽  
Ilija Djordjevic ◽  
Kaveh Eghbalzadeh ◽  
...  

Circulation ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 118 (suppl_18) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tetsuya Sakamoto ◽  
Yasufumi Asai ◽  
Ken Nagao ◽  
Yoshio Tahara ◽  
Takahiro Atsumi ◽  
...  

Background: In Japan, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) became popular for cardiac arrest patients who resist conventional advanced life supports. Regardless of many clinical experiences, there has been no previous systematic literature review. Methods: Case series, reports and proceedings of scientific meeting about ECPR for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest written in Japanese between January 1, 1983 and July 31, 2007 were collected with Japana Centra Revuo Medicina (medical publication database in Japan) and review by experts. The outcome and characteristics of the patients were investigated, and the influence of publication bias of the case series study was also examined by the Funnel Plot method. Results: There were 951 out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients who received ECPR in 92 reports (including 59 case series and 33 case reports) during the period. The average of age was 38.1 (4 – 88) years old and 76.1% was male. Three hundreds and eighty-one cases (40.1%) were arrests of cardiac etiology, and 212 were non-cardiac (22.3%). The cause of arrest was not described in other 37.6%. Excluding reports for only one case, weighted survival rate at discharge of 792 cases those were clearly described the outcome was 39.5±10.0%. When the relationship between the number of cases and the survival rate at discharge in each 59 case series study was shown in figure by the Funnel Plot method, the plotted data presented the reverse-funnel type that centered on the average of survival rate of all. Conclusions: The influence of publication bias of previous reports in Japan was relatively low. ECPR can greatly contribute to improve the outcome of out-of hospital cardiac arrests.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document