How Bayesian statistics may help answer some of the controversial questions in clinical research on Alzheimer's disease

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 917-919
Author(s):  
Anna G. M. Temp ◽  
Michael W. Lutz ◽  
Dominic Trepel ◽  
Yi Tang ◽  
Eric‐Jan Wagenmakers ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. 1055-1063 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua D. Grill ◽  
Dan Hoang ◽  
Daniel L. Gillen ◽  
Chelsea G. Cox ◽  
Adrijana Gombosev ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (S9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lovingly Park ◽  
Lev Gertsik ◽  
Zyanya Mendoza ◽  
Lydia Morris ◽  
Claudia Aguilar ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 31 (s3) ◽  
pp. S5-S18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolás Fayed ◽  
Pedro J. Modrego ◽  
Gulillermo Rojas Salinas ◽  
José Gazulla

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (10) ◽  
pp. 627
Author(s):  
Carol Dillon ◽  
Patricio Pérez Leguizamon ◽  
Silvina Heisecke ◽  
Diego M. Castro ◽  
Jorge Lopez Camelo ◽  
...  

Background: The use of biomarkers in basic and clinical research as well as in clinical practice has become so common that their presence as primary endpoints in clinical trials is now accepted. A biomarker refers to a broad subcategory of medical signs. The aims of this article are to consider the of use biomarkers in Mild stages of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) in research and clinical settings, in addition to defining their utility in clinical practice relating this with nutritional and lifestyle factors as possible treatment. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, PubMed, and AgeLine databases using different keywords.Conclusions: A summary of the utility of biomarkers in AD and nutritional and lifestyle factors used as treatment in mild stages are described.Key words: Biomarkers, Alzheimer’s disease, Dementia, Utility, Clinical practice, Nutritional


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document