On the tool use behavior of the bonobo-chimpanzee last common ancestor, and the origins of hominine stone tool use

2014 ◽  
Vol 76 (10) ◽  
pp. 910-918 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Haslam
Keyword(s):  
Tool Use ◽  
Common Ancestor ◽  
Stone Tool ◽  
Last Common Ancestor ◽  
Use Behavior

scholarly journals Fossil hominin shoulders support an African ape-like last common ancestor of humans and chimpanzees

2015 ◽  
Vol 112 (38) ◽  
pp. 11829-11834 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan M. Young ◽  
Terence D. Capellini ◽  
Neil T. Roach ◽  
Zeresenay Alemseged
Keyword(s):  
Tool Use ◽  
High Speed ◽  
Common Ancestor ◽  
Modern Human ◽  
Last Common Ancestor ◽  
Ancestral State ◽  
Evolutionary Trajectories ◽  
Parsimonious Model ◽  
And Function ◽  
Fossil Hominin

Reconstructing the behavioral shifts that drove hominin evolution requires knowledge of the timing, magnitude, and direction of anatomical changes over the past ∼6–7 million years. These reconstructions depend on assumptions regarding the morphotype of the Homo–Pan last common ancestor (LCA). However, there is little consensus for the LCA, with proposed models ranging from African ape to orangutan or generalized Miocene ape-like. The ancestral state of the shoulder is of particular interest because it is functionally associated with important behavioral shifts in hominins, such as reduced arboreality, high-speed throwing, and tool use. However, previous morphometric analyses of both living and fossil taxa have yielded contradictory results. Here, we generated a 3D morphospace of ape and human scapular shape to plot evolutionary trajectories, predict ancestral morphologies, and directly test alternative evolutionary hypotheses using the hominin fossil evidence. We show that the most parsimonious model for the evolution of hominin shoulder shape starts with an African ape-like ancestral state. We propose that the shoulder evolved gradually along a single morphocline, achieving modern human-like configuration and function within the genus Homo. These data are consistent with a slow, progressive loss of arboreality and increased tool use throughout human evolution.

scholarly journals Spontaneous categorization of tools based on observation in children and chimpanzees

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thibaud Gruber ◽  
Aurélien Frick ◽  
Satoshi Hirata ◽  
Ikuma Adachi ◽  
Dora Biro
Keyword(s):  
Tool Use ◽  
Common Ancestor ◽  
Current Model ◽  
Matching To Sample ◽  
Last Common Ancestor ◽  
Functional Categories ◽  
Teleological Reasoning ◽  
Single Category ◽  
Unique Ability

AbstractThe acquisition of the concept of ‘tool’ remains intriguing from both developmental and comparative perspectives. Our current model of tool use development in children is based on humans’ supposedly unique ability to adopt a teleological stance: the understanding of a demonstrator’s goal-based intentions when using a tool. It is however unclear how children and chimpanzees, our closest relatives, combine their knowledge of different objects whose function is to act on other parts of the environment, and assign them to a single category of ‘tools’. Here, we used a function-based approach to address this question. We exposed 7 to 11-year-old children and adult chimpanzees to a Matching-to-Function (MTF) task to explore whether they would sort tools and non-tools separately after demonstration of their function by an experimenter. MTF is a variant of Matching-to-Sample where the sample and the target are from the same category/kind rather than identical. Around 40% of children paired objects according to their function in the MTF task, with only one child younger than 8 years doing so. Moreover, when verbally questioned, these children offered a function-based answer to explain their choices. One of six chimpanzees also successfully paired objects according to function. Children and at least one chimpanzee can thus spontaneously sort tools into functional categories based on observing a demonstrator. The success of a single chimpanzee in our task suggests that teleological reasoning might already have been present in our last common ancestor but also shows that human children more readily conceptualize tools in a spontaneous fashion.

scholarly journals Spontaneous categorization of tools based on observation in children and chimpanzees

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thibaud Gruber ◽  
Aurélien Frick ◽  
Satoshi Hirata ◽  
Ikuma Adachi ◽  
Dora Biro
Keyword(s):  
Tool Use ◽  
Common Ancestor ◽  
Current Model ◽  
Matching To Sample ◽  
Last Common Ancestor ◽  
Functional Categories ◽  
Teleological Reasoning ◽  
Unique Ability

The acquisition of the concept of ‘tool’ remains intriguing for both developmental and comparative reasons. Our current model of tool use development in children is based on humans’ supposedly unique ability to adopt a teleological stance: the understanding of a demonstrator’s goal-based intentions when using a tool. It is however unclear how children and chimpanzees, our closest relatives, combine their knowledge of different objects whose function is to act on other parts of the environment, and assign them to the same category of ‘tools’. Here, we used a function-based approach to address this question. We exposed 7 to 11-year-old children and adult chimpanzees to a Matching-to-Function (MTF) task to explore whether they would sort tools and non-tools separately after demonstration of their function by an experimenter. MTF is a variant of Matching-to-Sample where the sample and the target are from the same category/kind rather than identical. Around 40% of children paired objects according to their function in the MTF task, with only one child younger than 8 doing so. Moreover, when verbally questioned, they offered a function-based answer to explain their choices. One of six chimpanzees also successfully paired objects according to function. Children and at least one chimpanzee can thus spontaneously sort tools into functional categories based on observing a demonstrator. The success of a single chimpanzee in our task suggests that teleological reasoning might have been already present in our last common ancestor but also shows that human children more readily conceptualize tools in a spontaneous fashion.

scholarly journals Experimental evidence for yawn contagion in orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus)

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Evy van Berlo ◽  
Alejandra P. Díaz-Loyo ◽  
Oscar E. Juárez-Mora ◽  
Mariska E. Kret ◽  
Jorg J. M. Massen
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Evidence ◽  
Common Ancestor ◽  
Great Apes ◽  
Pongo Pygmaeus ◽  
Last Common Ancestor ◽  
Contagious Yawning ◽  
Proximate Mechanism ◽  
Social Species ◽  
Ultimate Causation

AbstractYawning is highly contagious, yet both its proximate mechanism(s) and its ultimate causation remain poorly understood. Scholars have suggested a link between contagious yawning (CY) and sociality due to its appearance in mostly social species. Nevertheless, as findings are inconsistent, CY’s function and evolution remains heavily debated. One way to understand the evolution of CY is by studying it in hominids. Although CY has been found in chimpanzees and bonobos, but is absent in gorillas, data on orangutans are missing despite them being the least social hominid. Orangutans are thus interesting for understanding CY’s phylogeny. Here, we experimentally tested whether orangutans yawn contagiously in response to videos of conspecifics yawning. Furthermore, we investigated whether CY was affected by familiarity with the yawning individual (i.e. a familiar or unfamiliar conspecific and a 3D orangutan avatar). In 700 trials across 8 individuals, we found that orangutans are more likely to yawn in response to yawn videos compared to control videos of conspecifics, but not to yawn videos of the avatar. Interestingly, CY occurred regardless of whether a conspecific was familiar or unfamiliar. We conclude that CY was likely already present in the last common ancestor of humans and great apes, though more converging evidence is needed.

scholarly journals Recombinant transfer in the basic genome ofEscherichia coli

2015 ◽  
Vol 112 (29) ◽  
pp. 9070-9075 ◽  
Author(s):  
Purushottam D. Dixit ◽  
Tin Yau Pang ◽  
F. William Studier ◽  
Sergei Maslov
Keyword(s):  
Common Ancestor ◽  
Recipient Cell ◽  
Gene Clusters ◽  
Selective Advantage ◽  
Last Common Ancestor ◽  
Genome Sequences ◽  
Bacterial Genomes ◽  
Basic Genome ◽  
Single Base Pair ◽  
Generalized Transduction

An approximation to the ∼4-Mbp basic genome shared by 32 strains ofEscherichia colirepresenting six evolutionary groups has been derived and analyzed computationally. A multiple alignment of the 32 complete genome sequences was filtered to remove mobile elements and identify the most reliable ∼90% of the aligned length of each of the resulting 496 basic-genome pairs. Patterns of single base-pair mutations (SNPs) in aligned pairs distinguish clonally inherited regions from regions where either genome has acquired DNA fragments from diverged genomes by homologous recombination since their last common ancestor. Such recombinant transfer is pervasive across the basic genome, mostly between genomes in the same evolutionary group, and generates many unique mosaic patterns. The six least-diverged genome pairs have one or two recombinant transfers of length ∼40–115 kbp (and few if any other transfers), each containing one or more gene clusters known to confer strong selective advantage in some environments. Moderately diverged genome pairs (0.4–1% SNPs) show mosaic patterns of interspersed clonal and recombinant regions of varying lengths throughout the basic genome, whereas more highly diverged pairs within an evolutionary group or pairs between evolutionary groups having >1.3% SNPs have few clonal matches longer than a few kilobase pairs. Many recombinant transfers appear to incorporate fragments of the entering DNA produced by restriction systems of the recipient cell. A simple computational model can closely fit the data. Most recombinant transfers seem likely to be due to generalized transduction by coevolving populations of phages, which could efficiently distribute variability throughout bacterial genomes.

Stone tool use by wild capuchin monkeys (Sapajus libidinosus) at Serra das Confusões National Park, Brazil

Primates ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 385-394 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiago Falótico ◽  
Paulo Henrique M. Coutinho ◽  
Carolina Q. Bueno ◽  
Henrique P. Rufo ◽  
Eduardo B. Ottoni
Keyword(s):  
Tool Use ◽  
National Park ◽  
Stone Tool ◽  
Capuchin Monkeys
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document