Suicidal ideation and planning among Mexican adolescents are associated with depression polygenic risk scores

Author(s):  
Gabriela A. Martinez‐Levy ◽  
Adrian I. Campos ◽  
Jill A. Rabinowitz ◽  
Luis M. García‐Marín ◽  
Corina Benjet ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Fanelli ◽  
Marcus Sokolowski ◽  
Danuta Wasserman ◽  
Siegfried Kasper ◽  
Joseph Zohar ◽  
...  

AbstractSuicide is the second leading cause of death among young people. Genetics may contribute to suicidal phenotypes and their co-occurrence in other psychiatric and medical conditions. Our study aimed to investigate the association of polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for 22 psychiatric, inflammatory, and cardio-metabolic traits and diseases with suicide attempt (SA) or treatment-worsening/emergent suicidal ideation (TWESI).PRSs were computed based on summary statistics of genome-wide association studies. Regression analyses were performed between PRSs and SA or TWESI in four clinical cohorts, including up to 3,834 individuals, and results were meta-analyzed across samples. Stratified genetic covariance analyses were performed to investigate the biology underlying cross-phenotype PRS associations. After Bonferroni correction, PRS for major depressive disorder (MDD) was positively associated with SA (p=1.7e-4). Nominal associations were shown between PRSs for coronary artery disease (CAD) (p=4.6e-3) or loneliness (p=0.009) and SA, PRSs for MDD or CAD and TWESI (p=0.033 and p=0.032, respectively). Genetic covariance between MDD and SA was shown in 35 gene sets related to drugs having anti-suicidal effects.A higher genetic liability for MDD may underlie a higher risk of SA. Further, but milder, possible modulatory factors are genetic risk for loneliness and CAD.


2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S296-S297
Author(s):  
Brenda Cabrera ◽  
José Jaime Martínez-Magaña ◽  
Alma Delia Genis Mendoza ◽  
Emmanuel Sarmiento ◽  
David Ruíz-Ramos ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Suicidal behavior may be divided into completed suicide, suicide attempts, and suicidal ideation. It has been suggested that these behaviors represent a continuum and result from the interaction of several contributors, including genetic and environmental factors. The integration of approaches considering the polygenic component of suicidal behavior, such as polygenic risk scores (PRS) and DNA methylation is promising for improving our understanding of the complex interplay between genetic and environmental factors in this behavior. The aim of this study was the evaluation of DNA methylation differences between individuals with high and low genetic burden for suicidality. Methods The present study was divided into two phases. In the first phase, genotyping with the Psycharray chip was performed in a discovery sample of 568 Mexican individuals, of which 149 had suicidal behavior (64 individuals with suicidal ideation, 50 with suicide attempt and 35 with completed suicide) and 419 non-suicide controls. Then, a PRS analysis based on summary statistics from the Psychiatric Genomic Consortium was performed in the discovery sample. In a second phase, we evaluated DNA methylation differences between individuals with high and low genetic burden for suicidality in a sub-sample of the discovery sample (target sample) of 94 subjects. Methylation profile from individuals in the target sample was assessed with the Illumina Infinium Human Methylation EPIC BeadChip. Results We identified 153 differentially methylated sites between individuals with low and high-PRS. From these, 91 sites were hypermethylated and 62 hypomethylated in the high PRS group relative to low PRS group. Among genes mapped to differentially methylated sites, we found genes involved in neurodevelopment and ATP binding. Discussion To our knowledge, this is the first study integrating polygenic risk scores and DNA methylation in suicidality. Our results suggest that genetic variants might increase the predisposition to epigenetic variations in genes involved in neurodevelopment. This study highlights the possible implication of polygenic burden in the alteration of epigenetic changes in suicidal behavior.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 286-286
Author(s):  
Anatoliy Yashin ◽  
Dequing Wu ◽  
Konstantin Arbeev ◽  
Arseniy Yashkin ◽  
Galina Gorbunova ◽  
...  

Abstract Persistent stress of external or internal origin accelerates aging, increases risk of aging related health disorders, and shortens lifespan. Stressors activate stress response genes, and their products collectively influence traits. The variability of stressors and responses to them contribute to trait heterogeneity, which may cause the failure of clinical trials for drug candidates. The objectives of this paper are: to address the heterogeneity issue; to evaluate collective interaction effects of genetic factors on Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and longevity using HRS data; to identify differences and similarities in patterns of genetic interactions within two genders; and to compare AD related genetic interaction patterns in HRS and LOADFS data. To reach these objectives we: selected candidate genes from stress related pathways affecting AD/longevity; implemented logistic regression model with interaction term to evaluate effects of SNP-pairs on these traits for males and females; constructed the novel interaction polygenic risk scores for SNPs, which showed strong interaction potential, and evaluated effects of these scores on AD/longevity; and compared patterns of genetic interactions within the two genders and within two datasets. We found there were many genes involved in highly significant interactions that were the same and that were different within the two genders. The effects of interaction polygenic risk scores on AD were strong and highly statistically significant. These conclusions were confirmed in analyses of interaction effects on longevity trait using HRS data. Comparison of HRS to LOADFS data showed that many genes had strong interaction effects on AD in both data sets.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander S. Hatoum ◽  
Emma C. Johnson ◽  
David A. A. Baranger ◽  
Sarah E. Paul ◽  
Arpana Agrawal ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Michael Wainberg ◽  
Peter Zhukovsky ◽  
Sean L. Hill ◽  
Daniel Felsky ◽  
Aristotle Voineskos ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Our understanding of major depression is complicated by substantial heterogeneity in disease presentation, which can be disentangled by data-driven analyses of depressive symptom dimensions. We aimed to determine the clinical portrait of such symptom dimensions among individuals in the community. Methods This cross-sectional study consisted of 25 261 self-reported White UK Biobank participants with major depression. Nine questions from the UK Biobank Mental Health Questionnaire encompassing depressive symptoms were decomposed into underlying factors or ‘symptom dimensions’ via factor analysis, which were then tested for association with psychiatric diagnoses and polygenic risk scores for major depressive disorder (MDD), bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. Replication was performed among 655 self-reported non-White participants, across sexes, and among 7190 individuals with an ICD-10 code for MDD from linked inpatient or primary care records. Results Four broad symptom dimensions were identified, encompassing negative cognition, functional impairment, insomnia and atypical symptoms. These dimensions replicated across ancestries, sexes and individuals with inpatient or primary care MDD diagnoses, and were also consistent among 43 090 self-reported White participants with undiagnosed self-reported depression. Every dimension was associated with increased risk of nearly every psychiatric diagnosis and polygenic risk score. However, while certain psychiatric diagnoses were disproportionately associated with specific symptom dimensions, the three polygenic risk scores did not show the same specificity of associations. Conclusions An analysis of questionnaire data from a large community-based cohort reveals four replicable symptom dimensions of depression with distinct clinical, but not genetic, correlates.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document