scholarly journals Linking subsistence harvest diversity and productivity to adaptive capacity in an Alaskan food sharing network

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shane A. Scaggs ◽  
Drew Gerkey ◽  
Katherine R. McLaughlin
Keyword(s):  
Adaptive Capacity ◽  
Food Sharing

Food sharing patterns in three species of callitrichid monkeys (Callithrix jacchus, Leontopithecus chrysomelas, Saguinus midas): Individual and species differences.

2019 ◽  
Vol 133 (4) ◽  
pp. 474-487 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eloísa M. Guerreiro Martins ◽  
Antonio C. de A. Moura ◽  
Christa Finkenwirth ◽  
Michael Griesser ◽  
Judith M. Burkart
Keyword(s):  
Species Differences ◽  
Callithrix Jacchus ◽  
Food Sharing ◽  
Leontopithecus Chrysomelas ◽  
Sharing Patterns

Kapasitas Adaptasi dan Resiliensi Komunitas Menghadapi Bencana Erupsi Gunung Merapi

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
pp. 617
Author(s):  
Nyimas Ayu Dillashandy ◽  
Nurmala K Panjaitan
Keyword(s):  
Adaptive Capacity ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Qualitative Data ◽  
Sampling Method ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Community Resilience ◽  
Simple Random Sampling ◽  
Quantitative Approach ◽  
Institutional Memory ◽  
Innovative Learning

Mount Merapi eruption has occurred several times in Indonesia and the biggest eruption that last occurred in 2010. The community were suffered losses and were affected by eruptions. The purposes of this research are to analyze community resilience, to analyze the level of vulnerability, and to analize the community adaptive capacity. The research using a quantitative approach supported by qualitative data. Simple random sampling technique is used as the sampling method and the informant was taken purposively. The results of this research showed that when the eruption occurred the community has a high vulnerability. The adaptive capacity is also high with innovative learning based on institutional memory and supported by the connectedness. Communities achieve resilience and can adapt to changes with high adaptive capacity.  Keywords: adaptive capacity, community resilience, eruption, vulnerability ABSTRAK Erupsi Gunung Merapi sudah terjadi beberapa kali di Indonesia dan erupsi terbesar yang terjadi terakhir kalinya yaitu pada tahun 2010. Komunitas mengalami berbagai kerugian dan terkena dampak dari erupsi. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis resiliensi komunitas, menganalisis tingkat kerentanan komunitas, dan menganalisis kapasitas adaptasi komunitas. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan dengan menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif yang didukung oleh data kualitatif. Pemilihan responden dilakukan dengan teknik sampel acak sederhana sedangkan pemilihan terhadap informan dilakukan secara sengaja. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa saat erupsi terjadi komunitas memiliki kerentanan yang tinggi. Kapasitas adaptasi komunitas tinggi dengan adanya innovative learning yang didasari oleh pengetahuan dan pengalaman dan didukung oleh jaringan yang dimiliki. Komunitas berhasil mencapai resiliensi dan dapat beradaptasi dengan perubahan-perubahan dengan kapasitas adaptasi yang tinggi.Kata kunci : kapasitas adaptasi, kerentanan, erupsi, resiliensi komunitas

The functionality and resources of the body of runners-sprinters with diff erent adaptive capacity

2019 ◽  
pp. 68-70
Author(s):  
S.S. Pavlenkovich ◽  
◽  
L.K. Tokaeva ◽  
T.A. Bespalova ◽  
I.V. Smyshlyaeva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adaptive Capacity ◽  
The Body

Changing Focus? How to Take Adaptive Capacity Seriously

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Ludi ◽  
Lindsey Jones ◽  
Simon Levine
Keyword(s):  
Adaptive Capacity

Nexus between vulnerability and adaptive capacity of drought-prone rural households in northern Bangladesh

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roquia Salam ◽  
Abu Reza Md. Towfiqul Islam ◽  
Badhon Kumar Shill ◽  
G. M. Monirul Alam ◽  
Md. Hasanuzzaman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adaptive Capacity ◽  
Rural Households

scholarly journals Hospital managers’ perspectives with implementing quality improvement measures and a new regulatory framework: a qualitative case study

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. e042847 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sina Furnes Øyri ◽  
Geir Sverre Braut ◽  
Carl Macrae ◽  
Siri Wiig
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Adaptive Capacity ◽  
Qualitative Content Analysis ◽  
Regulatory Framework ◽  
Local Context ◽  
Quality And Safety ◽  
Hospital Practice ◽  
Hospital Managers ◽  
Safety Improvement

A new regulatory framework to support local quality and safety efforts in hospitals was introduced to the Norwegian healthcare system in 2017. This study aimed to investigate hospital managers’ perspectives on implementation efforts and the resulting work practices, to understand if, and how, the new Quality Improvement Regulation influenced quality and safety improvement activities.DesignThis article reports one study level (the perspectives of hospital managers), as part of a multilevel case study. Data were collected by interviews and analysed according to qualitative content analysis.SettingThree hospitals retrieved from two regional health trusts in Norway.Participants20 hospital managers or quality advisers selected from different levels of hospital organisations.ResultsFour themes were identified in response to the study aim: (1) adaptive capacity in hospital management and practice, (2) implementation efforts and challenges with quality improvement, (3) systemic changes and (4) the potential to learn. Recent structural and cultural changes to, and development of, quality improvement systems in hospitals were discovered (3). Participants however, revealed no change in their practice solely due to the new Quality Improvement Regulation (2). Findings indicated that hospital managers are legally responsible for quality improvement implementation and participants described several benefits with the new Quality Improvement Regulation (2). This related to adaptation and flexibility to local context, and clinical autonomy as an inevitable element in hospital practice (1). Trust and a safe work environment were described as key factors to achieve adverse event reporting and support learning processes (4).ConclusionsThis study suggests that a lack of time, competence and/or motivation, impacted hospitals’ implementation of quality improvement efforts. Hospital managers’ autonomy and adaptive capacity to tailor quality improvement efforts were key for the new Quality Improvement Regulation to have any relevant impact on hospital practice and for it to influence quality and safety improvement activities.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document