scholarly journals Single-agent ibrutinib versus chemoimmunotherapy regimens for treatment-naïve patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia: A cross-trial comparison of phase 3 studies

2018 ◽  
Vol 93 (11) ◽  
pp. 1402-1410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tadeusz Robak ◽  
Jan A. Burger ◽  
Alessandra Tedeschi ◽  
Paul M. Barr ◽  
Carolyn Owen ◽  
...  
Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (21) ◽  
pp. 1796-1801 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer A. Woyach

This article provides a comprehensive review of the first-line therapy in the rapidly evolving field of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).


2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Versha Banerji ◽  
Peter Anglin ◽  
Anna Christofides ◽  
Sarah Doucette ◽  
Pierre Laneuville

The 2019 annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology took place 7–10 December in Orlando, Florida. At the meeting, results from key studies in treatment-naïve chronic lymphocytic leukemia were presented. Of those studies, phase III oral presentations focused on the efficacy and safety of therapy with Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) and B-cell lymphoma-2 (BCL-2) inhibitors. One presentation reported updated results of the ECOG 1912 trial comparing the efficacy and safety of ibrutinib plus rituximab to fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, rituximab in patients with CLL younger than 70 years of age. A second presentation reported interim results of the ELEVATE-TN trial, which is investigating the efficacy and safety of acalabrutinib plus obinutuzumab or acalabrutinib monotherapy versus chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab. A third presentation reported on the single-agent zanubrutinib arm of the SEQUOIA trial in patients with del(17p). The final presentation reported a data update from the CLL14 trial, which is evaluating fixed-duration venetoclax and obinutuzumab versus chlorambucil and obinutuzumab, including the association of minimal residual disease status on progression-free survival. Our meeting report describes the foregoing studies and presents interviews with investigators and commentaries by Canadian hematologists about potential effects on Canadian practice.


2019 ◽  
Vol 98 (12) ◽  
pp. 2749-2760 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilles Salles ◽  
Emmanuel Bachy ◽  
Lukas Smolej ◽  
Martin Simkovic ◽  
Lucile Baseggio ◽  
...  

AbstractAfter analyzing treatment patterns in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) (objective 1), we investigated the relative effectiveness of ibrutinib versus other commonly used treatments (objective 2) in patients with treatment-naïve and relapsed/refractory CLL, comparing patient-level data from two randomized registration trials with two real-world databases. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, adjusted for differences in baseline characteristics. Rituximab-containing regimens were often prescribed in clinical practice. The most frequently prescribed regimens were fludarabine + cyclophosphamide + rituximab (FCR, 29.3%), bendamustine + rituximab (BR, 17.7%), and other rituximab-containing regimens (22.0%) in the treatment-naïve setting (n = 604), other non-FCR/BR rituximab-containing regimens (38.7%) and non-rituximab–containing regimens (28.5%) in the relapsed/refractory setting (n = 945). Adjusted HRs (95% CI) for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), respectively, with ibrutinib versus real-world regimens were 0.23 (0.14–0.37; p < 0.0001) and 0.40 (0.22–0.76; p = 0.0048) in the treatment-naïve setting, and 0.21 (0.16–0.27; p < 0.0001) and 0.29 (0.21–0.41; p < 0.0001) in the relapsed/refractory setting. When comparing real-world use of ibrutinib (n = 53) versus other real-world regimens in relapsed/refractory CLL (objective 3), adjusted HRs (95% CI) were 0.37 (0.22–0.63; p = 0.0003) for PFS and 0.53 (0.27–1.03; p < 0.0624) for OS. This adjusted analysis, based on nonrandomized patient data, suggests ibrutinib to be more effective than other commonly used regimens for CLL.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5478-5478
Author(s):  
Zhijian Cao ◽  
Jun Ma

Background: For most of the elderly chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients, treatment outcome focus on achievement of clinical response, relief of symptoms and prolongation of life expectancy, but comorbidities, frailty and reduced functional status in elderly patients make the standard treatments intolerable and less efficacious. Single agent Ibrutinib (Ibr), an inhibitor of oral Bruton's tyrosine kinase, is approved for the front-line treatment of patients with CLL by Chinese Food and Drug Administration (CFDA) in 2017. Objectives: This study evaluated effeicacy and safety of single agent Ibrutinib in elderly patients with treatment-naive chronic lymphocytic leukemia for 2 years in our center. Methods: Patients over 65 years old with previously untreated CLL/SLL (n = 37) were received Ibr 420 mg once daily continuously until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. We examined baseline demographics/disease characteristics, endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety in patients with CLL receiving ibrutinib. Results: 37 CLL patients over 65 years old were enrolled and treated with from June 2017 to May 2019 in our center. The median follow-up was 19.4 months (range, 0.8-31.6 months). Their F/M ratio was 16/21 and the median age of the enrolled population was 77.3 years (range, 65.4-92.7 years). 31 (83.8%) patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1. In these patients, 18/34 (52.9%) had del17p and/or TP53 mutation, and 20/30 (66.7%) had unmutated IGHV. With Ibr, Overall response rate (ORR) was 91.9%; complete response (CR) was 8.0%, partial response (PR) was 51.4%, and PR with lymphocytosis (PRwL) was 32.4%. Median progress free survival (PFS) was 17.3 months (95% CI, 14.3-24.0); PFS rates at 12 and 24 months were 87.1% and 74.0%, respectively. Median PFS with ibrutinib was comparable in pts with/without del17p and/or TP53 mutation (16.4 [95% CI, 14.3-NE] vs 14.5 months [95% CI, 13.9-NE]) and with unmutated/mutated IGHV (16.8 [95% CI, 12.1-22.8] vs 19.7 months [95% CI, 14.3-23.0]). Overall survival (OS) rates were 95.8% and 86.8% at 12 and 24 months, respectively. Median time to best response was 4.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.7-5.5). With median follow-up of 19.4 months, 21.6% (8/37) of pts had progressed or died. In the safety analysis, the most common serious adverse events (AEs) were recorded in 6 patients include neutropenia (4 pts), pneumonia (3 pts), hypertension (3 pts), anemia (2 pts), hyponatremia (2 pts), and atrial fibrillation (2 pts). AEs of any grade leading to ibr discontinuation occurred in 3 pts over time. Conclusions: In total, single agent ibrutinib was well tolerated and yielded high response rates, including for pts with high-risk genomic features, that were durable and deepened over time in treatment-naive elderly patients with CLL. Ibrutinib also had sustained PFS and OS benefit. Safety profile was acceptable and the most serious adverse events were neutropenia, pneumonia, hypertension, anemia, hyponatremia, and atrial fibrillation. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 5292-5292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Candida Vitale ◽  
Maria Ciccone ◽  
Christina Hinojosa ◽  
Michael Keating ◽  
Naveen Pemmaraju ◽  
...  

Abstract Chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) is a disease of the elderly, and patients frequently present with multiple concomitant medical problems such as other cancers. These patients, although common in the real-world clinical practice, are usually not considered eligible for clinical trials. We therefore designed a phase II study to investigate the activity and toxicity of ofatumumab in older unfit patients with CLL/SLL. Patients were considered candidates for this trial if they had a diagnosis of treatment-naïve CLL/SLL, treatment indication according to 2008 IWCLL guidelines, age ≥65 years, and ECOG performance status of 2-3 and/or Charlson comorbidity index ≥2. Patients with the diagnosis of another malignancy, or the coexistence of other serious medical conditions were enrolled in this study. Ofatumumab was administered intravenously weekly for the first month (300 mg day 1 and 2,000 mg day 8, 15, 22), then monthly (2,000 mg day 1) for a total of 12 months. The first 8 patients received ofatumumab at 1,000 mg, however, starting from patient number 9 the trial was amended and the administered dose of ofatumumab was increased to 2,000 mg, based on reports of increased efficacy with this dose. Acetaminophen, prednisolone and diphenhydramine were administered prior to ofatumumab to ameliorate infusion reactions. To date, twenty-seven of the thirty-four planned patients have been enrolled. Patients' characteristics were as follows: Table. Number of patients 27 Age, years, median (range) 73 (65-86) Male/Female 12/15 Rai stage 3-4 13 (48%) Absolute lymphocyte count, 106/µl, median (range) 35.4 (0.8-226.2) β2 microglobulin, mg/L, median (range) 3.7 (1.6-11.9) Months from diagnosis, median (range) 32 (0-251) FISH1 normal/del(13q)tris(12)del(11q)del(17p) 9 (33%)8 (30%)9 (33%)1 (4%) IGVH Unmutated2 13 (59%) ZAP70 positive3 16 (64%) CD38 positive3 14 (56%) 1Hierarchical classification. 2Data available for 22 patients. 3Data available for 25 patients. Eight patients (30%) had another concomitant cancer diagnosis: melanoma, basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, papillary thyroid carcinoma, cervical cancer, colorectal cancer, meningioma, essential thrombocythemia, pancreatic neuroendocrine cancer. Twenty-five patients are evaluable for response: one patient is too early for response evaluation and one patient discontinued treatment during the first month due to the development of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH). Eighteen patients achieved a response for an overall response rate of 72%. We observed complete responses (CR) in 4 patients (16%), and partial responses in 6 patients (56%). One CR patient achieved minimal residual disease negativity. Of note, the higher ofatumumab dose seems to be associated with increased efficacy, with responses observed in 14/17 (82%) patients treated at the 2,000 mg dose, and in 4/8 (50%) patients treated at the 1,000 mg dose. At this time, 17 patients remain progression-free and 10 patients have progressed, with a median follow up of 13 months (range 2-39 months). The estimated median time to next treatment is 20 months. Twenty-five patients are alive. One patient died of infectious complications two years after receiving ofatumumab while on a subsequent treatment regimen, and one patient died of complications of HLH, less than 4 months after treatment initiation. All 27 patients are evaluable for toxicity. Infusion-related reactions (IRR) were the most common treatment-related adverse events (AEs). We observed IRR grade (G)3 in one patient (4%) and G1-2 in 18 patients (67%). Fifteen patients (55%) experienced G1-2 infectious AEs, but no G3-4 infectious AEs were observed. Additional G3-4 AEs which were considered to be at least possibly related to the study drug were: diarrhea/nausea/vomiting G3 (1 patient), hyperglycemia G3 (2 patients), pulmonary embolism G3 (1 patient). In conclusion, our experience indicates that single agent ofatumumab is a feasible and well tolerated therapeutic approach for treatment-naïve older unfit patients with CLL/SLL. This treatment is able to obtain clinical response in 72% of these patients. In this trial, ofatumumab could be safely administered to patients with severe comorbidities and other cancer diagnoses. Disclosures Keating: Celgene Corp.: Consultancy; Glaxo-Smith-Kline Inc.: Other: Advisory board. Pemmaraju:Stemline: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; LFB: Consultancy, Honoraria. Burger:Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Research Funding.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8024-8024 ◽  
Author(s):  
John C. Byrd ◽  
Jennifer Ann Woyach ◽  
Richard R. Furman ◽  
Peter Martin ◽  
Susan Mary O'Brien ◽  
...  

8024 Background: The next-generation Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor acalabrutinib was approved in patients (pts) with treatment-naïve (TN) and relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) based on two complementary phase 3 studies, ELEVATE-TN and ASCEND. This report of ACE-CL-001 (NCT02029443), the first phase 2 study of acalabrutinib, provides the longest safety and efficacy follow-up to date in symptomatic TN CLL pts. Methods: Adults with TN CLL/SLL were eligible if they met iwCLL 2008 criteria for treatment, were inappropriate for/declined standard chemotherapy and had ECOG performance status 0–2. Pts received acalabrutinib 100 mg BID or 200 mg QD, later switching to 100 mg BID, until progressive disease (PD) or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was safety. Events of clinical interest (ECI) were based on combined AE terms for infections, bleeding events, hypertension, and second primary malignancies (SPM) excluding non-melanoma skin, and on a single AE term for atrial fibrillation. Additional endpoints included investigator-assessed overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), time to response (TTR), and event-free survival (EFS). Results: Ninety-nine pts (n = 62 100 mg BID; n = 37 200 mg QD), were treated [median age: 64 years, 47% Rai stage 3–4 disease, 10% del(17p), 62% unmutated IGHV]. At median follow-up of 53 months (range, 1–59), 85 (86%) pts remain on treatment; most discontinuations were due to AEs (n = 6) or PD (n = 3 [n = 1 Richter transformation]). Most common AEs (any grade) were diarrhea (52%), headache (45%), upper respiratory tract infection (44%), arthralgia (42%), and contusion (42%). All-grade and grade ≥3 ECIs included infection (84%, 15%), bleeding events (66%, 3%), and hypertension (22%, 11%). Atrial fibrillation (all grades) occurred in 5% of pts (incidence: 1% in years 1, 2, 4; 3% in year 3). SPMs excluding non-melanoma skin (all grades) occurred in 11%. Serious AEs were reported in 38% of pts; those in > 2 pts were pneumonia (n = 4) and sepsis (n = 3). ORR was 97% (7% complete response; 90% partial response). Median TTR was 3.7 months (range, 2–22). Response rates were similar across high-risk groups. Median DOR and median EFS were not reached; 48-month DOR rate was 97% (95% CI, 90%–99%), and 48-month EFS rate was 90% (95% CI, 82%–94%). Conclusions: Long-term data from ACE-CL-001 further support the favorable results with acalabrutinib in phase 3 studies and demonstrate durable responses with no new long-term safety issues. Clinical trial information: NCT02029443 .


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5563-5563
Author(s):  
Muhammad Sardar ◽  
Saad Ullah Malik ◽  
Ali Younas Khan ◽  
Chaudhry Saad Sohail ◽  
Malik Qistas Ahmad ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Treatment of Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) depends on stage of disease, age, functional status, comorbidities and presence of cytogenetic abnormalities such as (del17p mutation). Ibrutinib was initially approved in CLL given its better response in del17p patients as compared to the standard chemo immunotherapy. Since initial approval, Ibrutinib has also been evaluated in del17p negative CLL patients. Aim of our study is to discuss the efficacy of ibrutinib based regimen in CLL. Methods: Seven databases (Pub Med/Medline, Elsevier/Embase, Elsevier/Scopus, Wiley/Cochrane Library, and Thomas Reuters/Web of Science, EBSCO/CINAHL, and ClinicalTrials.gov.) were searched in accordance with PRISMA statement guidelines using the following keywords: chronic lymphocytic leukemia, CLL, Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, BTK inhibitor, ibrutinib, and PCI32765. Inclusion criteria included prospective clinical trials using Ibrutinib in CLL patients with outcome data available. We excluded systematic reviews, met analysis, case reports and case series. Aim of our review was to evaluate overall response rate (ORR), complete response rate (CR), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: Treatment naïve (TN)patientIn the extended 5-year median follow up of a phase 1/2b trial (n=31), the ORR with single agent Ibr was 87% (CR-29%). The 5-year PFS and OS was 92%. In phase 3 trial by Burger et al (2015), ORR with Ibr was 92% (CR18%) in 136 patients. 2-year PFS and OS was 89% and 95% respectively. Del17p patients were excluded. Recent phase 2 trial by Jain et al (2017), combination of ibr with fludarabine (flu), cyclophosphamide (cyclo) and obinutuzumab (G) achieved ORR of 100% (CR 46%) in 32 del17p negative patients. In the phase 2 trial by Davids et al (2017) in 49 patients (< 65 years) the ORR was 100% (CR 63%). Phase 1b/2 trial by Migouel, ORR was 96% (CR 52%) with a combination regimen of Ibr + G + venetoclax. Relapsed/refractory (R/R) patient :In a phase 3 trial by Byrd et al (2014), in 195 patients (median age: 67; del17p: 32%; median prior therapies: 3) the ORR was 63%(CR-O). Median follow up was 9.4 months with 6-month PFS of 88% and 12 months OS of 90%. Phase 2 trial by Burger et al (2014), the ORR was 95% (CR 8%) in 40 patients (median age:63%; del17p:50%; median prior therapies:2). The 18-month PFS and OS was 78% and 84% respectively. In the phase 3 trial by Chanan et al (2016), in 289 (median age 64) del17p negative patients with 2 median prior therapies treated with combination of Ibr + bendamustine + R, the ORR was 83% (CR 10%). The 18-month PFS was 79%. In the phase 3 trial by Sharman et al (2017), in the Ibr + ublituximab arm (n=64) the ORR was 78% (CR 7%) which was higher than in Ibr arm (n= 62) i.e 45% (CR 0). Median age was 67 and each arm received 3 median prior therapies. Del17p was positive in 64% and 66% respectively. Del17p patients: In the phase 2 trial of by Susan et al (2017), in 145 del17p positive patients (median age: 64) treated with Ibr, the ORR was 64% (CR 0). The median prior number of therapies was 2. Patients were followed for a median of 11.5 months and the 2-year PFS and OS was 63% and 75% respectively. Farooqui et al (2014) evaluated Ibr in del17p patients. In 35 TN patients the ORR was 97% (CR -0) with a 2 year PFS and OS of 82% and 84% respectively. In 16 R/R patients, ORR was 80% (CR 0) and the 2 year PFS and OS were 82% and 74% respectively. Median age was 62 Conclusion: Ibrutinib is the treatment of choice for patients with del17p mutation and has good efficacy in RR/TN patients without del17p mutation. Ibrutinib is being evaluated in combination with rituximab for del17p mutations. Future prospects include combination of Ibrutinib with frontline chemotherapy and other novel agents for TN and RR del17p negative patients. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 133 (10) ◽  
pp. 1011-1019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan A. Burger ◽  
Mariela Sivina ◽  
Nitin Jain ◽  
Ekaterina Kim ◽  
Tapan Kadia ◽  
...  

Abstract Ibrutinib, an oral covalent inhibitor of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase, is an effective therapy for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). To determine whether rituximab provides added benefit to ibrutinib, we conducted a randomized single-center trial of ibrutinib vs ibrutinib plus rituximab. Patients with CLL requiring therapy were randomized to receive 28-day cycles of once-daily ibrutinib 420 mg, either as a single agent (n = 104), or together with rituximab (375 mg/m2; n = 104), given weekly during cycle 1, then once per cycle until cycle 6. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) in the intention-to-treat population. We enrolled 208 patients with CLL, 181 with relapsed CLL and 27 treatment-naive patients with high-risk disease (17p deletion or TP53 mutation). After a median follow-up of 36 months, the Kaplan-Meier estimates of PFS were 86% (95% confidence interval [CI], 76.6-91.9) for patients receiving ibrutinib, and 86.9% (95% CI, 77.3-92.6) for patients receiving ibrutinib plus rituximab. Similarly, response rates were the same in both arms (overall response rate, 92%). However, time to normalization of peripheral blood lymphocyte counts and time to complete remission were shorter, and residual disease levels in the bone marrow were lower, in patients receiving ibrutinib plus rituximab. We conclude that the addition of rituximab to ibrutinib in relapsed and treatment-naive high-risk patients with CLL failed to show improvement in PFS. However, patients treated with ibrutinib plus rituximab reached their remissions faster and achieved significantly lower residual disease levels. Given these results, ibrutinib as single-agent therapy remains current standard-of-care treatment in CLL. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02007044.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document