scholarly journals History of consolidation is prognostic in acute myeloid leukemia patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in minimal residual disease-negative first complete remission

2017 ◽  
Vol 92 (10) ◽  
pp. 1032-1036 ◽  
Author(s):  
Armin Rashidi ◽  
Michael A. Linden ◽  
Todd E. DeFor ◽  
Erica Warlick ◽  
Nelli Bejanyan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
History Of ◽  
Minimal Residual ◽  
First Complete Remission ◽  
Acute Myeloid

scholarly journals Persistence of Minimal Residual Disease Assessed By Multi-Parameter Flow Cytometry (MFC) at 30 and 90 Days after Achieving Complete Remission Predicts Outcome in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 1015-1015
Author(s):  
Pramod Pinnamaneni ◽  
Jeffrey L. Jorgensen ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Elias Jabbour ◽  
Sherry R. Pierce ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Response To Therapy ◽  
Minimal Residual ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Purpose – To determine the value of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) assessed by Multi-parameter Flow Cytometry (MFC) after achieving initial response to therapy, in predicting outcome in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) Methods – We investigated the predictive value of MRD assessment by MFC in 191 patients with newly diagnosed AML treated between February 2010 and April 2014 at our institution who had available MRD assessment. MRD by MFC was assessed using an 8-color panel containing 19 distinct markers, on bone marrow specimens obtained at the time of achievement of CR and at approximately 30 days and 90 days after achieving CR. Residual leukemic blasts were identified based on phenotypic differences from normal myelomonocytic precursors. Sensitivity was estimated at 0.1% in most cases, with maximum achievable sensitivity of 0.01%, depending on the leukemic phenotype. Results – Of the 191 patients, 167 (87%) achieved complete remission (CR) or CR without platelet recovery (CRp). Their median age was 58 years (Range, 17-85). 84 (44%) were older than 60 years. Median WBC at presentation was 3.2 x 109/L(Range, 0.5-100.2 x 109/L) and median bone marrow blast percentage was 43% (Range, 11-96%). Cytogenetics was favorable risk in 4 (2%), intermediate risk in130 (68%) and adverse risk in 57 (30%). Treatment included cytarabine plus anthracycline in 170 (89%) and hypomethylating agents-based strategies in 21 (11%). 48 patients had available samples at 30 days post CR and 32 (67%) became MRD negative. Achieving MRD negative status was associated with a statistically significant improvement in CR duration (p=0.02) and overall survival (OS) (p=0.0005). 56 patients were evaluated for MRD status at 90 days and 45 (80%) were negative. Again, achieving MRD negative status was associated with a significant improvement in CR duration (p=0.002) and OS (p=0.0009). Conclusion – Achieving MRD negative status by MFC at 30 and 90 days post CR is associated with an improved outcome in patients with AML Figure 1 Figure 1. Figure 2 Figure 2. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Indications for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Acute Myeloid Leukemia in the Genomic Era

2014 ◽  
pp. e327-e333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederick R. Appelbaum
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Prospective Studies ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Allogeneic Hct ◽  
Comorbidity Index ◽  
Minimal Residual ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Few choices in medical oncology are as stark as the decision of whether or not to proceed with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Recent advances provide more information to inform the decision, including molecular studies of leukemia that predict tumor responsiveness, assays of minimal residual disease that measure early treatment outcome, and comorbidity indices that predict nonrelapse mortality. Although large prospective studies incorporating all of these factors are lacking, literature reviews and consensus statements exist that can help the clinician in this difficult choice. Allogeneic HCT should be considered for all patients younger than age 65, with an available donor, an acceptable comorbidity index, and whose had initial induction therapy has failed. Similarly, allogeneic HCT is appropriate therapy for all patients with AML in second remission younger than age 75, with an appropriate donor, and a comorbidity index of 5 or less. For patients younger than age 60 with AML in first complete remission (CR), there is little evidence that HCT benefits those with favorable-risk disease who achieve CR with one cycle of induction and have no evidence of minimal residual disease. Allogeneic HCT is indicated for essentially all other categories of patients. For those age 60 and older, few prospective studies are available on which to base recommendations, but, as in younger patients, the benefit of allogeneic HCT is questionable for patients with favorable-risk AML. For patients with higher-risk disease, allogeneic HCT is a reasonable option with the caution that the risk of HCT increases dramatically in those with a comorbidity index of 3 or higher.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document