scholarly journals Estimated annual numbers of US acute-care hospital patients at risk for venous thromboembolism

2007 ◽  
Vol 82 (9) ◽  
pp. 777-782 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederick A. Anderson ◽  
Maxim Zayaruzny ◽  
John A. Heit ◽  
Dogan Fidan ◽  
Alexander T. Cohen
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Theresa Carroll

Practice Problem: Alcohol Use Disorders (AUD) affects a significant portion of the population in the United States. When AUD is either unrecognized or inadequately treated in the acute care setting it can lead to medical complications, increased length or stay (LOS), increased healthcare expense, and increased patient mortality. PICOT: In a population of adult patients admitted to an acute care hospital progressive care unit (P), how does applying an initial evidence-based screening tool to detect risk for moderate to severe alcohol withdrawal, the PAWSS (I), compare to no standard screening or assessment for potential alcohol withdrawal symptoms (C) affect the occurrence of patient deterioration for acute alcohol withdrawal symptoms (O) within an eight week timeframe (T)? Intervention: The PAWSS tool was utilized to screen all patients admitted to the progressive care unit. Patients identified at moderate to severe risk by a score of ≥4 were treated according to the standard facility practice with included CIWA-Ar monitoring and medication management with benzodiazepine medication. Outcome: The project was able to demonstrate a significant decrease in the mean LOS for those patients identified at risk and treated for AWS, with an average decrease of 50 hours in length of stay for those patients treated during the project implementation. Conclusion: Early recognition of patients at risk for AWS is an important component of effective management and treatment. Further study is needed into best practices for treatment of patients at risk, and internal compliance measures within the organization.


2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren Dutcher ◽  
Naasha Talati ◽  
Jacqueleen Wise ◽  
Jennifer Han

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 205031211667092
Author(s):  
Evan S. Cole ◽  
Carla Willis ◽  
William C Rencher ◽  
Mei Zhou

Objectives: Because most research on long-term acute care hospitals has focused on Medicare, the objective of this research is to describe the Georgia Medicaid population who received care at a long-term acute care hospital, the type and volume of services provided by these long-term acute care hospitals, and the costs and outcomes of these services. For those with select respiratory conditions, we descriptively compare costs and outcomes to those of patients who received care for the same services in acute care hospitals. Methods: We describe Georgia Medicaid recipients admitted to a long-term acute care hospital between 2011 and 2012. We compare them to a population of Georgia Medicaid recipients admitted to an acute care hospital for one of five respiratory diagnosis-related groups. Measurements used include patient descriptive information, admissions, diagnosis-related groups, length of stay, place of discharge, 90-day episode costs, readmissions, and patient risk scores. Results: We found that long-term acute care hospital admissions for Medicaid patients were fairly low (470 90-day episodes) and restricted to complex cases. We also found that the majority of long-term acute care hospital patients were blind or disabled (71.2%). Compared to patients who stayed at an acute care hospital, long-term acute care hospital patients had higher average risk scores (13.1 versus 9.0), lengths of stay (61 versus 38 days), costs (US$143,898 versus US$115,056), but fewer discharges to the community (28.4% versus 51.8%). Conclusion: We found that the Medicaid population seeking care at long-term acute care hospitals is markedly different than the Medicare populations described in other long-term acute care hospital studies. In addition, our study revealed that Medicaid patients receiving select respiratory care at a long-term acute care hospital were distinct from Medicaid patients receiving similar care at an acute care hospital. Our findings suggest that state Medicaid programs should carefully consider reimbursement policies for long-term acute care hospitals, including bundled payments that cover both the original hospitalization and long-term acute care hospital admission.


2010 ◽  
Vol 251 (2) ◽  
pp. 330-338 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ajay K. Kakkar ◽  
Alexander T. Cohen ◽  
Victor F. Tapson ◽  
Jean-Francois Bergmann ◽  
Samuel Z. Goldhaber ◽  
...  

Circulation ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 118 (suppl_18) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marion Leary ◽  
Lori Albright ◽  
Emily B Meshberg ◽  
Noah T Sugerman ◽  
Lance B Becker ◽  
...  

Background: Resuscitation from cardiac arrest often depends on prompt cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) from the lay public, yet bystander CPR rates in the US are low. One barrier to bystander CPR delivery is that most arrests occur in the home, where only family members may be available to provide care. Little data exist regarding the ability to target and train family members of “at-risk” patients in CPR. Objective: We sought to implement a CPR video self-instruction (VSI) program for family members of in-hospital patients at risk for cardiac arrest. After training in situ before hospital discharge, we tested the hypothesis that at-risk patient family members would be motivated to secondarily train others in the home after leaving the hospital setting. Methods: Family members of patients hospitalized for cardiac conditions at one tertiary-care hospital between 12/07 and 6/08 who met pre-defined inclusion criteria were offered CPR VSI training requiring 25–30 min. All trainees were assessed for skill competence and video recorded for analysis. Trainees were encouraged to take the VSI kit home, and follow-up surveys were conducted to gauge secondary training of other family members. Results: Among 36 enrollees, mean age (SD) was 50 (13) and 78% of trainees were female; only 17% had been CPR trained within the past 10 years, and 44% had never been trained. Most (67%) of the trainees were either children or spouses of the at-risk hospitalized patients. Most (78%) trainees rated their experience with learning CPR via VSI as “comfortable” or “very comfortable”. During 2 min of CPR skills assessment, mean (SD) chest compression rate was 100 (19), mean percentage (SD) adequate depth was 89% (15%), and mean (SD) time for two breaths was 10.8 (4.6) sec. Follow-up surveys revealed that 33% of recipients performed secondary training at home, with a mean (SD) of 1.8 (1.3) secondary trainees. Conclusions: CPR VSI training for family members of hospitalized cardiac patients may serve as a cost-effective model to disseminate resuscitation skills and allows for secondary training in the home of patients at risk for sudden cardiac arrest.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document