scholarly journals Recombinant factor VIIa (NovoSeven®) for post-prostatectomy hemorrhage in a patient with type I von Willebrand disease

2001 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael D. Tarantino ◽  
Rozanne Aberle
Keyword(s):  
Recombinant Factor Viia ◽  
Factor Viia ◽  
Von Willebrand Disease ◽  
Type I ◽  
Von Willebrand

The Genetic Defect of Type I von Willebrand Disease “Vicenza” Is Linked to the von Willebrand Factor Gene

1993 ◽  
Vol 69 (02) ◽  
pp. 173-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna M Randi ◽  
Elisabetta Sacchi ◽  
Gian Carlo Castaman ◽  
Francesco Rodeghiero ◽  
Pier Mannuccio Mannucci
Keyword(s):  
Von Willebrand Factor ◽  
Autosomal Dominant ◽  
Genetic Defect ◽  
Von Willebrand Disease ◽  
Type I ◽  
Bleeding Tendency ◽  
Factor Gene ◽  
Low Levels ◽  
Von Willebrand ◽  
Willebrand Factor

SummaryType I von Willebrand disease (vWD) Vicenza is a rare variant with autosomal dominant transmission, characterized by the presence of supranormal von Willebrand factor (vWF) multimers in plasma, similar to those normally found in endothelial cells and megakaryocytes. The patients have very low levels of plasma vWF contrasting with a mild bleeding tendency. The pathophysiology of this subtype is still unknown. The presence of supranormal multimers in the patients’ plasma could be due to a mutation in the vWF molecule which affects post-translational processing, or to a defect in the cells’ processing machinery, independent of the vWF molecule. In order to determne if type I vWD Vicenza is linked to the vWF gene, we studied six polymorphic systems identified within the vWF gene in two apparently unrelated families with type I vWD Vicenza. The results of this study indicate a linkage between vWF gene and the type I vWD Vicenza trait. This strongly suggests that type I vWD Vicenza is due to a mutation in one of the vWF alleles, which results in an abnormal vWF molecule that is processed to a lesser extent than normal vWF.

Evaluation of the Abnormal Platelet Function in von Willebrand Disease by the Blood Filtration Test

1996 ◽  
Vol 76 (03) ◽  
pp. 460-468 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco I Pareti ◽  
Marco Cattaneo ◽  
Luca Carpinelli ◽  
Maddalena L Zighetti ◽  
Caterina Bressi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Function ◽  
Relevant Information ◽  
Von Willebrand Disease ◽  
Type I ◽  
Cumulative Number ◽  
Primary Hemostasis ◽  
Normal Platelet ◽  
Filter Test ◽  
Type 3 ◽  
Von Willebrand

SummaryWe have evaluated platelet function in different subtypes of von Willebrand disease (vWD) by pushing blood through the capillarysized channels of a glass filter. Patients, including those with type IIB vWD, showed lower than normal platelet retention and increased cumulative number of blood drops passing through the filter as a function of time. In contrast, shear-induced platelet aggregation, measured in the cone-and-plate viscometer, was paradoxically increased in type IIB patients. Treatment with l-desamino-8-D-arginine vasopressin (DDAVP) tended to normalize the filter test in patients with type I-platelet normal and type I-platelet low vWD, but infusion of a factor VUI/von Willebrand factor (vWF) concentrate lacking the largest vWF multimers was without effect in type 3 patients. Experiments with specific monoclonal antibodies demonstrated that the A1 and A3 domains of vWF, as well as the glycoproteins Ibα and Ilb-IIIa on platelets, are required for platelet retention in the filter. Thus, the test may reflect vWF function with regard to both platelet adhesion and aggregation under high shear stress, and provide relevant information on mechanisms involved in primary hemostasis.

The role of platelet von Willebrand factor in platelet adhesion and thrombus formation: a study of 34 patients with various subtypes of type I von Willebrand disease

1994 ◽  
Vol 86 (2) ◽  
pp. 327-332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edith Fressinaud ◽  
Augusto B. Federici ◽  
Giancarlo Castaman ◽  
Chantal Rothschild ◽  
Francesco Rodeghiero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Von Willebrand Factor ◽  
Platelet Adhesion ◽  
Thrombus Formation ◽  
Von Willebrand Disease ◽  
Type I ◽  
Von Willebrand ◽  
Willebrand Factor

How I treat the acquired von Willebrand syndrome

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 117 (25) ◽  
pp. 6777-6785 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Tiede ◽  
Jacob H. Rand ◽  
Ulrich Budde ◽  
Arnold Ganser ◽  
Augusto B. Federici
Keyword(s):  
Factor Viia ◽  
Medical Condition ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Von Willebrand Disease ◽  
Acquired Von Willebrand Syndrome ◽  
Functional Interference ◽  
Typical Treatment ◽  
Evidence Based Guidelines ◽  
Von Willebrand ◽  
Willebrand Factor

Abstract The acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS) is a bleeding disorder that is frequently unrecognized or is misdiagnosed as von Willebrand disease. AVWS is characterized by structural or functional defects of von Willebrand factor (VWF) that are secondary to autoimmune, lymphoproliferative or myeloproliferative, malignant, cardiovascular, or other disorders. VWF abnormalities in these disorders can result from (1) antibody-mediated clearance or functional interference, (2) adsorption to surfaces of transformed cells or platelets, or (3) increased shear stress and subsequent proteolysis. Diagnosis can be challenging as no single test is usually sufficient to prove or exclude AVWS. Furthermore, there are no evidence-based guidelines for management. Treatments of the underlying medical condition, including chemo/radiotherapy, surgery, or immunosuppressants can result in remission of AVWS, but is not always feasible and successful. Because of the heterogeneous mechanisms of AVWS, more than one therapeutic approach is often required to treat acute bleeds and for prophylaxis during invasive procedures; the treatment options include, but are not limited to, desmopressin, VWF-containing concentrates, intravenous immunoglobulin, plasmapheresis or recombinant factor VIIa. Here, we review the management of AVWS with an overview on the currently available evidence and additional considerations for typical treatment situations.

Limitations of Current Plasma VonWillebrand Factor (VWF) Activity Tests: A Comprehensive Comparison of Five VWF Activity Assays.

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 3376-3376
Author(s):  
Dong Chen ◽  
Rajiv Pruthi ◽  
William L. Nichols ◽  
John A. Heit
Keyword(s):  
Activity Ratio ◽  
Light Transmission ◽  
Von Willebrand Disease ◽  
Assay Method ◽  
Type I ◽  
Platelet Activity ◽  
Platelet Aggregometry ◽  
Von Willebrand

Abstract Accurate measurement of plasma von Willebrand factor (VWF) activity is essential for the laboratory diagnosis and treatment monitoring of von Willebrand disease (VWD). Currently available VWF activity assays include VWF ristocetin cofactor activity by manual light transmission platelet aggregometry (VWF:RCo–Agg) or flow cytometry (VWF:RCo–FL), collagen I and III binding activity (VWF:Co–I and –III) (Technozym), and platelet activity by latex agglutination (VWF:Lx) (Instrumental Laboratory). In this study we evaluated and compared the accuracy and precision of these 5 assay methods. Plasma samples from 11 normal donors and 41 patients categorized as type 1 (n=20) or type 2 (n=21) VWD based on clinical evaluation, fVIII:C activity, VWF:RCo–Agg, VWF antigen (VWF:Ag) level and plasma VWF multimer analysis by agarose gel electrophoresis were assayed for VWF activity by VWF:RCo–FL, VWF:Co–I, VWF:Co–III and VWF:Lx methods. The VWF:Ag/VWF activity ratio by VWF activity assay method was calculated for each sample. For normal donors and type I VWD patients, VWF:RCo–FL and VWF:Lx correlated well with VWF:RCo–Agg (R2=0.87, and 0.97, respectively), while VWF:Co–I and –III were lower compared to VWF:RCo-Agg. For type 2 VWD patients, different VWF:Ag/VWF activity ratio cutoffs (range 0.3–0.7) were used (Figure). Both VWF:RCo–Agg and –FL were sensitive (95%) and specific (97%) for type 2 VWD while the VWF:Lx was slightly less sensitive (81%) but was very specific (100%). VWF:Co–I and –III were the least sensitive (<90%) and specific (<90%); both methods had high false positive and negative rates for type 2 VWD. In Summary, for normals and type 1 VWD patients, VWF:RCo–FL and VWF:Lx correlate well with VWF:RCo–Agg and have similar sensitivities and specificities for type 2 VWD. VWF:Co–I and –III are unreliable for assessing plasma VWF activity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document