Commentary on the Future of Community Psychology: Perspective of a Research Community Psychologist

2016 ◽  
Vol 58 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 245-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norweeta G. Milburn
2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Wolff ◽  
M. Bond ◽  
K. Jeschke ◽  
D. Vossebrecher ◽  
O. Guessous

Author(s):  
Patricia Leavy

The book editor offers some final comments about the state of the field and promise for the future. Leavy suggests researchers consider using the language of “shapes” to talk about the forms their research takes and to highlight the ongoing role of the research community in shaping knowledge-building practices. She reviews the challenges and rewards of taking your work public. Leavy concludes by noting that institutional structures need to evolve their rewards criteria in order to meet the demands of practicing contemporary research and suggests that professors update their teaching practices to bring the audiences of research into the forefront of discussions of methodology.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesse Fox ◽  
Katy E Pearce ◽  
Adrienne L Massanari ◽  
Julius Matthew Riles ◽  
Łukasz Szulc ◽  
...  

Abstract The open science (OS) movement has advocated for increased transparency in certain aspects of research. Communication is taking its first steps toward OS as some journals have adopted OS guidelines codified by another discipline. We find this pursuit troubling as OS prioritizes openness while insufficiently addressing essential ethical principles: respect for persons, beneficence, and justice. Some recommended open science practices increase the potential for harm for marginalized participants, communities, and researchers. We elaborate how OS can serve a marginalizing force within academia and the research community, as it overlooks the needs of marginalized scholars and excludes some forms of scholarship. We challenge the current instantiation of OS and propose a divergent agenda for the future of Communication research centered on ethical, inclusive research practices.


Author(s):  
Ryan Florin ◽  
Stephan Olariu

Vehicular clouds is an active area of research that has emerged at the nexus of conventional cloud computing and vehicular networks. The defining differences between conventional and vehicular clouds include the heterogeneity and volatility of compute resources and the bandwidth-challenged network fabric. A variety of new architectures and services for vehicular clouds have been proposed, mostly as incremental extensions of the VANET platform. As vehicular cloud research continues and expands, a careful eye should be kept on the restrictions that come with the mobility, limited network, and heterogeneity of resources. The first main contribution of this chapter is to survey recent work of VCs with an eye on the realistic and unrealistic. Our second main goal is to realign the VC community with a realistic vision for the future by spelling out a number of challenges faced by the VC research community.


2021 ◽  
pp. 215-228
Author(s):  
Eric W. Welch

To better understand the effects of broadband use, there must first be a commitment from policymakers to support evaluation. This volume has made an argument about why policymakers should undertake this investment and has outlined needs and strategies for advancing this knowledge. It has also examined the profession of broadband evaluation itself. The complexity of broadband use demands an evaluation approach that values generalizability and applies multiple research methods. But it also requires a further development of common concepts, improved collection of and access to data, and comparison across policy areas, programs, scales, and time. To do all of this, we need not only more and better evaluation methods but also a research community around broadband evaluation that shares knowledge and effectively communicates evidence for policy. The future impact of broadband technology on effective and equitable use depends on concerted attention by both the research community and policymakers.


2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-44
Author(s):  
Marcelle M. Haddix

In this 2019 presidential address, I reflect on the significance of community across four areas: with youth and in school communities, within literacy teacher education, in community-engaged theories and methodologies, and within the professional organization. How do we define and understand community? Who and what is included and excluded? As a literacy research community, who are we becoming and who do we want to be? Drawing from historical and contemporary examples within and beyond literacy research, I take a look back and at the present to examine discourses of community and imagine possibilities for the future.


Author(s):  
Teresa Garate

In this chapter, the author shares the impact that community psychology has had on her professional life over the last 23 years and how its principles are embedded through her varied career experiences. She explains how her mentors, both community psychologists and their community of scholars, along with her many years of collaboration, transformed her from a special education teacher into a community psychologist. The chapter outlines how the principles of CP helped the author influence large institutions and government agencies to make systemic changes. Community psychology principles most relevant to the author’s career experience have been participatory action research, evaluation, and a deep understanding of community, broadly defined.


2015 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-27
Author(s):  
James Ferreira Moura ◽  
Lorena Brito da Silva ◽  
Elívia Camurça Cidade ◽  
Alana Alencar Braga ◽  
Verônica Morais Ximenes

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document