Thermal effects in gas absorption

Surjit L. Verma; George B. DeLancey

doi:10.1002/aic.690210112

Adiabatic gas absorption in packed columns with large thermal effects

Chemical Engineering & Technology ◽

10.1002/ceat.270180506 ◽

1995 ◽

Vol 18 (5) ◽

pp. 324-329 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Rama Swaminathan ◽

M. Sadasivam ◽

A. R. Balakrishnan

Keyword(s):

Thermal Effects ◽

Packed Columns ◽

Gas Absorption

Download Full-text

Calculation of gas absorption process considering thermal effects

Proceedings of the International Conference "Actual Issues of Mechanical Engineering" (AIME 2018) ◽

10.2991/aime-18.2018.79 ◽

2018 ◽

Author(s):

N.G. Neumoina ◽

E.V. Morozova ◽

A.V. Belov ◽

A.A. Polivanov

Keyword(s):

Thermal Effects ◽

Gas Absorption ◽

Absorption Process

Download Full-text

Study on the Reaction Factor for Gas Absorption with Thermal Effects

Chemical engineering ◽

10.1252/kakoronbunshu1953.33.886 ◽

1969 ◽

Vol 33 (9) ◽

pp. 886-893,a1 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Kakusaburo Onda ◽

Eizo Sada ◽

Takeshi Kobayashi ◽

Motoo Odaka

Keyword(s):

Thermal Effects ◽

Gas Absorption ◽

Reaction Factor

Download Full-text

Thermal Considerations in Lens Regulator Systems

Proceedings, annual meeting, Electron Microscopy Society of America ◽

10.1017/s0424820100068783 ◽

1970 ◽

Vol 28 ◽

pp. 358-359

Author(s):

K.C. Newton

Keyword(s):

Electron Microscope ◽

Thermal Effects ◽

Environmental Control ◽

Reference Networks ◽

Better Than

Thermal effects in lens regulator systems have become a major problem with the extension of electron microscope resolution capabilities below 5 Angstrom units. Larger columns with immersion lenses and increased accelerating potentials have made solutions more difficult by increasing the power being handled. Environmental control, component choice, and wiring design provide answers, however. Figure 1 indicates with broken lines where thermal problems develop in regulator systemsExtensive environmental control is required in the sampling and reference networks. In each case, stability better than I ppm/min. is required. Components with thermal coefficients satisfactory for these applications without environmental control are either not available or priced prohibitively.

Download Full-text

Direct measurement of electron-diffraction-pattern intensities using an energy loss spectrometer

Proceedings, annual meeting, Electron Microscopy Society of America ◽

10.1017/s0424820100155311 ◽

1989 ◽

Vol 47 ◽

pp. 668-669

Author(s):

A. G. Jackson ◽

M. Rowe

Keyword(s):

Thermal Effects ◽

Dynamic Range ◽

Scattering Amplitude ◽

Dynamical Theory ◽

Site Symmetry ◽

Proof Of Concept ◽

Parallel Acquisition ◽

Kinematic Approximation ◽

Speed Up ◽

Structure Calculations

Diffraction intensities from intermetallic compounds are, in the kinematic approximation, proportional to the scattering amplitude from the element doing the scattering. More detailed calculations have shown that site symmetry and occupation by various atom species also affects the intensity in a diffracted beam. [1] Hence, by measuring the intensities of beams, or their ratios, the occupancy can be estimated. Measurement of the intensity values also allows structure calculations to be made to determine the spatial distribution of the potentials doing the scattering. Thermal effects are also present as a background contribution. Inelastic effects such as loss or absorption/excitation complicate the intensity behavior, and dynamical theory is required to estimate the intensity value.The dynamic range of currents in diffracted beams can be 104or 105:1. Hence, detection of such information requires a means for collecting the intensity over a signal-to-noise range beyond that obtainable with a single film plate, which has a S/N of about 103:1. Although such a collection system is not available currently, a simple system consisting of instrumentation on an existing STEM can be used as a proof of concept which has a S/N of about 255:1, limited by the 8 bit pixel attributes used in the electronics. Use of 24 bit pixel attributes would easily allowthe desired noise range to be attained in the processing instrumentation. The S/N of the scintillator used by the photoelectron sensor is about 106 to 1, well beyond the S/N goal. The trade-off that must be made is the time for acquiring the signal, since the pattern can be obtained in seconds using film plates, compared to 10 to 20 minutes for a pattern to be acquired using the digital scan. Parallel acquisition would, of course, speed up this process immensely.

Download Full-text