Chromium (VI) separation from aqueous solution using anion exchange membrane

AIChE Journal ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 51 (7) ◽  
pp. 2001-2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Pugazhenthi ◽  
Anil Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Aqueous Solution ◽  
Anion Exchange ◽  
Anion Exchange Membrane ◽  
Chromium Vi ◽  
Exchange Membrane

Phosphate removal from aqueous solution by Donnan dialysis with anion-exchange membrane

2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 1968-1973 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shi-yang Chen ◽  
Zhou Shi ◽  
Yong Song ◽  
Xue-rui Li ◽  
Yuan-lai Hu
Keyword(s):  
Aqueous Solution ◽  
Anion Exchange ◽  
Anion Exchange Membrane ◽  
Phosphate Removal ◽  
Donnan Dialysis ◽  
Exchange Membrane

Chemically facilitated chromium(VI) transport throughout an anion-exchange membrane

2002 ◽  
Vol 963 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 205-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elianna Castillo ◽  
Mercè Granados ◽  
José Luis Cortina
Keyword(s):  
Anion Exchange ◽  
Anion Exchange Membrane ◽  
Chromium Vi ◽  
Exchange Membrane

Chromium(VI) transport through the Raipore 1030 anion exchange membrane

2002 ◽  
Vol 464 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elianna Castillo ◽  
Mercè Granados ◽  
José Luis Cortina
Keyword(s):  
Anion Exchange ◽  
Anion Exchange Membrane ◽  
Chromium Vi ◽  
Exchange Membrane

Removal of different anionic dyes from aqueous solution by anion exchange membrane

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 259-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Ali Khan ◽  
Muhammad Imran Khan ◽  
Shagufta Zafar
Keyword(s):  
Aqueous Solution ◽  
Anion Exchange ◽  
Anion Exchange Membrane ◽  
Anionic Dyes ◽  
Exchange Membrane

scholarly journals Removal of Congo Red from Aqueous Solution by Anion Exchange Membrane (EBTAC): Adsorption Kinetics and Themodynamics

Materials ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 4147-4161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Khan ◽  
Shahbaz Akhtar ◽  
Shagufta Zafar ◽  
Aqeela Shaheen ◽  
Muhammad Khan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aqueous Solution ◽  
Anion Exchange ◽  
Adsorption Kinetics ◽  
Congo Red ◽  
Anion Exchange Membrane ◽  
Exchange Membrane

Denitrification of ground water by electrodialysis using a new anion exchange membrane

2000 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 211-218
Author(s):  
F. Elhannouni ◽  
M. Belhadj ◽  
M. Taky ◽  
A. El Midaoui ◽  
L. Echihabi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ground Water ◽  
Anion Exchange ◽  
Anion Exchange Membrane ◽  
Exchange Membrane

scholarly journals Durability of Anion Exchange Membrane Water Electolyzers

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dongguo Li ◽  
Andrew R Motz ◽  
Chulsung Bae ◽  
Cy Fujimoto ◽  
Gaoqiang Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hydrogen Production ◽  
Anion Exchange ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Anion Exchange Membrane ◽  
Production Technologies ◽  
Exchange Membrane

Interest in the low-cost production of clean hydrogen is growing. Anion exchange membrane water electrolyzers (AEMWEs) are considered one of the most promising sustainable hydrogen production technologies because of their...

scholarly journals Effect of Gas Diffusion Layer Thickness on the Performance of Anion Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells

Processes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 718
Author(s):  
Van Men Truong ◽  
Ngoc Bich Duong ◽  
Hsiharng Yang
Keyword(s):  
Water Management ◽  
Anion Exchange ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Gas Diffusion ◽  
Anion Exchange Membrane ◽  
Cell Performance ◽  
Water Flooding ◽  
Diffusion Layer Thickness ◽  
Diffusion Layers ◽  
Exchange Membrane

Gas diffusion layers (GDLs) play a critical role in anion exchange membrane fuel cell (AEMFC) water management. In this work, the effect of GDL thickness on the cell performance of the AEMFC was experimentally investigated. Three GDLs with different thicknesses of 120, 260, and 310 µm (denoted as GDL-120, GDL-260, and GDL-310, respectively) were prepared and tested in a single H2/O2 AEMFC. The experimental results showed that the GDL-260 employed in both anode and cathode electrodes exhibited the best cell performance. There was a small difference in cell performance for GDL-260 and GDL-310, while water flooding was observed in the case of using GDL-120 operated at current densities greater than 1100 mA cm−2. In addition, it was found that the GDL thickness had more sensitivity to the AEMFC performance as used in the anode electrode rather than in the cathode electrode, indicating that water removal at the anode was more challenging than water supply at the cathode. The strategy of water management in the anode should be different from that in the cathode. These findings can provide a further understanding of the role of GDLs in the water management of AEMFCs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document