scholarly journals Quantifying the time‐specific kinetic energy of simulated rainfall using a dynamic rain gauge system

ael ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth M. Wacha ◽  
Chi‐hua Huang ◽  
Peter L. O'Brien ◽  
Athanasios N. Papanicolaou ◽  
Jerry L. Hatfield
Vacuum ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 188 ◽  
pp. 110188
Author(s):  
A. Tolstogouzov ◽  
P. Mazarov ◽  
A.E. Ieshkin ◽  
S.F. Belykh ◽  
N.G. Korobeishchikov ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 33 (10) ◽  
pp. 1283-1298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco Taveira Pinto ◽  
Raquel Silva

2011 ◽  
Vol 74 (4) ◽  
pp. 895-902 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tobias Dürig ◽  
Fabio Dioguardi ◽  
Ralf Büttner ◽  
Pierfrancesco Dellino ◽  
Daniela Mele ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harris Ramli ◽  
Siti Aimi Nadia Mohd Yusoff ◽  
Mastura Azmi ◽  
Nuridah Sabtu ◽  
Muhd Azril Hezmi

Abstract. It is difficult to define the hydrologic and hydraulic characteristics of rain for research purposes, especially when trying to replicate natural rainfall using artificial rain on a small laboratory scale model. The aim of this paper was to use a drip-type rainfall simulator to design, build, calibrate, and run a simulated rainfall. Rainfall intensities of 40, 60 and 80 mm/h were used to represent heavy rainfall events of 1-hour duration. Flour pellet methods were used to obtain the drop size distribution of the simulated rainfall. The results show that the average drop size for all investigated rainfall intensities ranges from 3.0–3.4 mm. The median value of the drop size distribution or known as D50 of simulated rainfall for 40, 60 and 80 mm/h are 3.4, 3.6, and 3.7 mm, respectively. Due to the comparatively low drop height (1.5 m), the terminal velocities monitored were between 63–75 % (8.45–8.65 m/s), which is lower than the value for natural rainfall with more than 90 % for terminal velocities. This condition also reduces rainfall kinetic energy of 25.88–28.51 J/m2mm compared to natural rainfall. This phenomenon is relatively common in portable rainfall simulators, representing the best exchange between all relevant rainfall parameters obtained with the given simulator set-up. Since the rainfall can be controlled, the erratic and unpredictable changeability of natural rainfall is eliminated. Emanating from the findings, drip-types rainfall simulator produces rainfall characteristics almost similar to natural rainfall-like characteristic is the main target.


2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (12) ◽  
pp. 6600-6605 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chuande Zhao ◽  
Yu Chi ◽  
Qiang Peng ◽  
Fang Yang ◽  
Jianhua Zhou ◽  
...  

5,5′-Bitetrazole-1,1′-dioxydihydroxylamine salt (TKX-50), a high-energy energetic material, possesses good safety and energy properties.


2008 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 742-753 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paweł Licznar ◽  
Janusz Łomotowski ◽  
Sławomir Błoński ◽  
Grzegorz J. Ciach

Abstract This study presents the construction and calibration of a low-cost piezoelectric microprocessor impactometer designed for the field measurements of the rainfall kinetic energy (KE) flux. Its precise calibration was performed in laboratory conditions using waterdrops of different sizes and fall velocities. High-speed photography was applied to measure the velocity of each waterdrop. Although the impactometer constructed for this study is not able to measure the momentum of waterdrops, its accuracy for measuring their KE is excellent. It was found that the processing of the piezoelectric signal might determine which physical quantity is measured by different impactometers. It was also found that the distance between the waterdrop impact position and the impactometer center has a significant effect on the sensor output. A scheme to account for this effect is developed in this study, and the calibration curve for field applications of the impactometer is derived. In addition, an example comparison of the concurrent field measurements of KE flux using the impactometer and rainfall rates using a weighing rain gauge is given.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nives Zambon ◽  
Lisbeth Lolk Johannsen ◽  
Peter Strauss ◽  
Tomáš Dostál ◽  
David Zumr ◽  
...  

<p>Soil erosion by water is globally the main soil degradation process which leaves serious consequences on agricultural land and water aquifers. Splash erosion is the initial stage of soil erosion by water, resulting from the destructive force of rain drops acting on soil surface aggregates. Splash erosion studies conducted in laboratories use rainfall simulators. They produce artificial rainfall which can vary according to type of the rainfall simulator. In this study the aim was to quantify the differences in splash erosion rates affected by rainfall produced by two different rainfall simulators on two silt loam and one loamy sand soil. Splash erosion was measured using modified Morgan splash cups and the rainfall simulators were equipped with four VeeJet or one FullJet nozzle. The soil samples placed under simulated rainfall were exposed to intensity range from 28 to 54 mm h<sup>-1</sup> and from 35 to 81 mm h<sup>-1</sup>, depending on the rainfall simulator. Rainfall characteristics such as drop size and velocity distribution were measured with an optical laser disdrometer Weather Sensor OTT Parsivel Version 1 (Parsivel) by OTT Messtechnik. Rainfall simulator with VeeJet nozzles produced smaller drops but higher drop velocity which resulted in higher kinetic energy per mm of rainfall compared to rainfall simulator with FullJet nozzles. For the same intensity rate measured kinetic energy under the rainfall simulator with VeeJet nozzles was 45% higher than rainfall kinetic energy from rainfall simulator with FullJet nozzles. Accordingly, the average splash erosion rate was 45 and 59% higher under the rainfall simulator with VeeJet nozzles for one silt loam and loamy sand soil, respectively. Splash erosion was found to be a linear or power function of the rainfall kinetic energy, depending on rainfall simulator. The obtained results highlight the sensitivity of the splash erosion process to rainfall characteristics produced by different rainfall simulators. The heterogeneity of rainfall characteristics between different types of rainfall simulators makes a direct comparison of results obtained from similar erosion studies difficult. Further experiments including comparison between more rainfall simulators could define influencing rainfall parameters on splash erosion under controlled laboratory conditions.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document