Operando Magnetometry Probing the Charge Storage Mechanism of CoO Lithium‐Ion Batteries

2021 ◽  
pp. 2006629
Author(s):  
Hongsen Li ◽  
Zhengqiang Hu ◽  
Qingtao Xia ◽  
Hao Zhang ◽  
Zhaohui Li ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
pp. 100928
Author(s):  
Silvio Scaravonati ◽  
Michele Sidoli ◽  
Giacomo Magnani ◽  
Alberto Morenghi ◽  
Marcello Canova ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 33 (12) ◽  
pp. 2170093
Author(s):  
Hongsen Li ◽  
Zhengqiang Hu ◽  
Qingtao Xia ◽  
Hao Zhang ◽  
Zhaohui Li ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Praanav Lodha

<p>This literature review explains the construction and charge storage mechanisms in Lithium-ion batteries. Further, it elaborates on the electrode reactions in Lithium-ion batteries, and commonly used electrode materials and their structures. Different types of Lithium-based batteries’ electrochemical performance were compared, in addition to other relevant differentiators. The energy storage mechanism in Supercapacitors is briefly touched upon – and the electrochemical performance of supercapacitors is compared with that of lithium-ion batteries. Battery supercapacitor hybrids are introduced, with a brief section on their development over the past two decades following explanations of the charge storage mechanism and construction of battery supercapacitor hybrids. Battery supercapacitor hybrids are then compared with existing electrochemical energy storage mechanisms and finally, two types of battery supercapacitor hybrids were discussed.</p>


Author(s):  
Huaizhi Wang ◽  
Linyi Zhao ◽  
Hao Zhang ◽  
Yongshuai Liu ◽  
Li Yang ◽  
...  

Rechargeable aluminium-ion batteries (AIBs) are considered to be promising alternatives for current lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), since they can offer the possibilities of low cost with high energy-to-price ratios. Unlike in...


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Praanav Lodha

<p>This literature review explains the construction and charge storage mechanisms in Lithium-ion batteries. Further, it elaborates on the electrode reactions in Lithium-ion batteries, and commonly used electrode materials and their structures. Different types of Lithium-based batteries’ electrochemical performance were compared, in addition to other relevant differentiators. The energy storage mechanism in Supercapacitors is briefly touched upon – and the electrochemical performance of supercapacitors is compared with that of lithium-ion batteries. Battery supercapacitor hybrids are introduced, with a brief section on their development over the past two decades following explanations of the charge storage mechanism and construction of battery supercapacitor hybrids. Battery supercapacitor hybrids are then compared with existing electrochemical energy storage mechanisms and finally, two types of battery supercapacitor hybrids were discussed.</p>


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (12) ◽  
pp. 4688-4691 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lingzhi Guo ◽  
Jinfeng Sun ◽  
Xuan Sun ◽  
Jinyang Zhang ◽  
Linrui Hou ◽  
...  

1D conductive Ni-CAT nanorods with a superb Li+ diffusion coefficient and electronic conductivity exhibited remarkable electrochemical lithium storage properties, and the charge-storage mechanism involved was rationally put forward.


Author(s):  
Xinyue Li ◽  
Marco Fortunato ◽  
Anna Maria Cardinale ◽  
Angelina Sarapulova ◽  
Christian Njel ◽  
...  

AbstractNickel aluminum layered double hydroxide (NiAl LDH) with nitrate in its interlayer is investigated as a negative electrode material for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). The effect of the potential range (i.e., 0.01–3.0 V and 0.4–3.0 V vs. Li+/Li) and of the binder on the performance of the material is investigated in 1 M LiPF6 in EC/DMC vs. Li. The NiAl LDH electrode based on sodium alginate (SA) binder shows a high initial discharge specific capacity of 2586 mAh g−1 at 0.05 A g−1 and good stability in the potential range of 0.01–3.0 V vs. Li+/Li, which is better than what obtained with a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF)-based electrode. The NiAl LDH electrode with SA binder shows, after 400 cycles at 0.5 A g−1, a cycling retention of 42.2% with a capacity of 697 mAh g−1 and at a high current density of 1.0 A g−1 shows a retention of 27.6% with a capacity of 388 mAh g−1 over 1400 cycles. In the same conditions, the PVDF-based electrode retains only 15.6% with a capacity of 182 mAh g−1 and 8.5% with a capacity of 121 mAh g−1, respectively. Ex situ X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and ex situ X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) reveal a conversion reaction mechanism during Li+ insertion into the NiAl LDH material. X-ray diffraction (XRD) and XPS have been combined with the electrochemical study to understand the effect of different cutoff potentials on the Li-ion storage mechanism. Graphical abstract The as-prepared NiAl-NO3−-LDH with the rhombohedral R-3 m space group is investigated as a negative electrode material for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). The effect of the potential range (i.e., 0.01–3.0 V and 0.4–3.0 V vs. Li+/Li) and of the binder on the material’s performance is investigated in 1 M LiPF6 in EC/DMC vs. Li. Ex situ X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and ex situ X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) reveal a conversion reaction mechanism during Li+ insertion into the NiAl LDH material. X-ray diffraction (XRD) and XPS have been combined with the electrochemical study to understand the effect of different cutoff potentials on the Li-ion storage mechanism. This work highlights the possibility of the direct application of NiAl LDH materials as negative electrodes for LIBs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document