A Superhydrophobic Smart Coating for Flexible and Wearable Sensing Electronics

2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (43) ◽  
pp. 1702517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lianhui Li ◽  
Yuanyuan Bai ◽  
Lili Li ◽  
Shuqi Wang ◽  
Ting Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Wearable Sensing ◽  
Smart Coating

scholarly journals Fatigue Testing of Wearable Sensing Technologies: Issues and Opportunities

Materials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (15) ◽  
pp. 4070
Author(s):  
Andrea Karen Persons ◽  
John E. Ball ◽  
Charles Freeman ◽  
David M. Macias ◽  
Chartrisa LaShan Simpson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fatigue Life ◽  
Prediction Models ◽  
Fatigue Testing ◽  
Low Cycle Fatigue ◽  
Wearable Sensors ◽  
Fatigue Tests ◽  
Proof Of Concept ◽  
Cycle Fatigue ◽  
Wearable Sensing ◽  
Failure Data

Standards for the fatigue testing of wearable sensing technologies are lacking. The majority of published fatigue tests for wearable sensors are performed on proof-of-concept stretch sensors fabricated from a variety of materials. Due to their flexibility and stretchability, polymers are often used in the fabrication of wearable sensors. Other materials, including textiles, carbon nanotubes, graphene, and conductive metals or inks, may be used in conjunction with polymers to fabricate wearable sensors. Depending on the combination of the materials used, the fatigue behaviors of wearable sensors can vary. Additionally, fatigue testing methodologies for the sensors also vary, with most tests focusing only on the low-cycle fatigue (LCF) regime, and few sensors are cycled until failure or runout are achieved. Fatigue life predictions of wearable sensors are also lacking. These issues make direct comparisons of wearable sensors difficult. To facilitate direct comparisons of wearable sensors and to move proof-of-concept sensors from “bench to bedside,” fatigue testing standards should be established. Further, both high-cycle fatigue (HCF) and failure data are needed to determine the appropriateness in the use, modification, development, and validation of fatigue life prediction models and to further the understanding of how cracks initiate and propagate in wearable sensing technologies.

Tracking Depression Dynamics in College Students Using Mobile Phone and Wearable Sensing

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui Wang ◽  
Weichen Wang ◽  
Alex daSilva ◽  
Jeremy F. Huckins ◽  
William M. Kelley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
College Students ◽  
Mobile Phone ◽  
Wearable Sensing

Telemedical Wearable Sensing Platform for Management of Chronic Venous Disorder

2015 ◽  
Vol 44 (7) ◽  
pp. 2282-2291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruya Li ◽  
Baoqing Nie ◽  
Chengwei Zhai ◽  
Jennifer Cao ◽  
Jian Pan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Wearable Sensing ◽  
Sensing Platform

scholarly journals Mobile and Wearable Sensing Frameworks for mHealth Studies and Applications

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-28
Author(s):  
Devender Kumar ◽  
Steven Jeuris ◽  
Jakob E. Bardram ◽  
Nicola Dragoni
Keyword(s):  
Wearable Sensing

Designing Wearable Microgrids: Towards Autonomous Sustainable On-body Energy Management

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lu Yin ◽  
Kyeong Nam Kim ◽  
Alexander Trifonov ◽  
Tatiana Podhajny ◽  
Joseph Wang
Keyword(s):  
Energy Management ◽  
Rapid Development ◽  
Wearable Electronics ◽  
Wearable Sensing ◽  
Sustainable Operation ◽  
Energy Independence ◽  
Body Energy

The rapid development of wearable sensing and interfacing electronics is facing challenges in sustainability and energy independence. The reliable sustainable operation of such autonomous wearable electronics hinges on the rational...

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document